30 years of ERCP and still the same problems?

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 833-835

  Guda, N M ^a   Freeman, M L ^b  

^a ST LUKE S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNULATION; COMORBIDITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDITORIAL; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDI SPHINCTER; PANCREATITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SPHINCTEROTOMY; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; MALE; STATISTICS;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PANCREATITIS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34548186741     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966771     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Classen M, Demling I. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974; 99:496-497
2. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc: 1974; 20: 148-151
3. Freeman MI, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:909-918
4. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998: 48: 1-10
5. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001:96:417-423
6. Cheng CI, Sherman S, Watkins JL et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-147
7. Freeman MI, Disario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
8. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007: 9: 793-802
9. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-834
10. Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, Ruppert T, Katalinic A, Hahn EG et al. Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques. Gastrointest Endosc: 1999; 50: 628-636
11. Nelson DB, Freeman ML. Major hemorrhage from endoscopic sphincterotomy: risk factor analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1994; 19: 283-287
12. Perini RF, Sadurski R, Cotton PB et al. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc 2005: 61:53-57
13. Varadarajulu S, Kilgore MI, Wilcox CM, Eloubeldi MA. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006: 64: 338-347
14. Perdue DG, Freeman M. Failed biliary ERCP: a prospective multicenter study of risk factors, complications, and resource utilization [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 192