Accuracy of 3D acquisition mode for myocardial FDG PET studies using a BGO-based scanner

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1439-1446

  Van Der Weerdt, Arno P ^a   Boellaard, Ronald ^a   Visser, Frans C ^a   Lammertsma, Adriaan A ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D; 18F FDG; Myocardial; PET; Scatter

Indexed keywords

BISMUTH DERIVATIVE; BISMUTH GERMANATE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GLUCOSE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE METABOLISM; HEART FUNCTION; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; METABOLIC RATE; PHANTOM; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION ATTENUATION; RADIATION SCATTERING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; GLUCOSE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIUM; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SCATTERING, RADIATION;

EID: 34548171438     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0367-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bailey DL. 3D acquisition and reconstruction in positron emission tomography. Ann Nucl Med 1992;6:123-30.
2. 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose and N-13 ammonia. Circulation 1983;67:766-78.
3. Tillisch J, Brunken R, Marshall R, Schwaiger M, Mandelkern M, Phelps M, et al. Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography. N Engl J Med 1986;314:884-8.
4. Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Yamashita K, Saji H, Magata Y, Senda M, et al. Positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 deoxyglucose in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1989;64:860-5.
5. Schwaiger M, Brunken R, Grover-McKay M, Krivokapich J, Child J, Tillisch JH, et al. Regional myocardial metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction assessed by positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:800-8.
6. Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ, Lafont A, Nemec JJ, Salcedo EE. Metabolic responses of hibernating and infarcted myocardium to revascularization. A follow-up study of regional perfusion, function, and metabolism. Circulation 1992;85:1347-53.
7. Gropler RJ, Geltman EM, Sampathkumaran K, Perez JE, Schechtman KB, Conversano A, et al. Comparison of carbon-11-acetate with fluorine-18- fluorodeoxyglucose for delineating viable myocardium by positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1587-97.
8. Bailey DL, Jones T. A method for calibrating three-dimensional positron emission tomography without scatter correction. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:660-4.
9. Badawi RD, Marsden PK, Cronin BF, Sutcliffe JL, Maisey MN. Optimization of noise-equivalent count rates in 3D PET. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:1755-76.
10. Zaidi H. Scatter modelling and correction strategies in fully 3-D PET. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:1181-4.
11. Badawi RD. 3D-Mode acquisition in clinical PET. Nucl Med Commun 1997;18:801-4.
12. 15O regional cerebral blood flow three-dimensional imaging technique. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993;13:617-29.
13. Dhawan V, Kazumata K, Robeson W, Belakhlef A, Margouleff C, Chaly T, et al. Quantitative brain PET. Comparison of 2D and 3D acquisitions on the GE Advance scanner. Clin Positron Imaging 1998;1:135-44.
14. 15O-PET. Brain 1999;122:1651-65.
15. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Krynycki B, Almeida O. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional 82-Rb myocardial perfusion PET imaging. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1350-6.
16. 15O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1031-40.
17. Votaw JR, White M. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82-Rb PET studies. J Nucl Med 2001;42:701-6.
18. 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2004;45:2008-15.
19. 18F-FDG PET for detecting of myocardial viability. Validation of 3D data acquisition. J Nucl Med 2005;46:19-24.
20. Adam LE, Zaers J, Ostertag H, Trojan H, Belleman ME, Brix G. Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR+ following the IEC standard. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997;44:1172-9.
21. Brix G, Zaers J, Adam LE, Bellemann ME, Ostertag H, Trojan H, et al. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1614-23.
22. Defrise M, Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Sibomana MC, Newport DF. Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:145-58.
23. Watson CC. New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2000;1587-94.
24. Bergström M, Eriksson L, Bohm C, Blomqvist G, Litton J. Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector positron camera by integral transformation of the projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:42-50.
25. Van der Weerdt AP, Klein LJ, Boellaard R, Visser CA, Visser FC, Lammertsma AA. Image-derived input functions for determination of MRGlu in cardiac F-18-FDG PET scans. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1622-9.
26. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983;3:1-7.
27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10.
28. Paans AMJ, Boerdijk SMM, Willemsen ATM, Pruim J. Source of impaired image quality in 3D whole-body FDG PET scanning. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:1207.
29. Visvikis D, Griffiths D, Costa DC, Bomanji J, Ell PJ. Clinical evaluation of 2D versus 3D whole body PET image quality using a dedicated BGO PET scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1050-6.
30. Halpern BS, Dahlbom M, Auerbach MA, Schiepers C, Fueger BJ, Weber WA, et al. Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study. J Nucl Med 2005;46:603-7.
31. 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. J Nucl Med 2006;47:23-31.
32. Mawlawi O, Podoloff DA, Kohlmyer S, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Culp RF, et al. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes. J Nucl Med 2004;45(10):1734-42.