Factors influencing neck pain intensity in whiplash-associated disorders in Sweden

Clinical Journal of Pain

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 591-597

  Holm, Lena W ^a   Carroll, Linda J ^c   David Cassidy, J ^d,e,f   Ahlbom, Anders ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b Stockholm Centre of Public Health   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bio psychosocial; Epidemiology; Pain intensity; Traffic injury; Whiplash

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECK PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; SWEDEN; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WHIPLASH INJURY;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SWEDEN; WHIPLASH INJURIES;

EID: 34548134834     PISSN: 07498047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318100181f     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Spitzer W, Skovron M, Salmi L, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine. 1995;15(8 suppl):1S-73S.
2. Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Côté P, et al. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1179-1186.
3. Jensen M, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117-126.
4. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain. 1994;58:387-392.
5. Summers S. Evidence-based practice part 2: reliability and validity of selected acute pain instruments. J Perianesth Nurs. 2001;16:35-40.
6. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, et al. A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine. 2001;26:E445-E458.
7. Hendriks EJ, Scholten-Peeters GG, van der Windt DA, et al. Prognostic factors for poor recovery in acute whiplash patients. Pain. 2005;114:408-416.
8. Soares JJ, Sundin O, Grossi G. Age and musculoskeletal pain. Int J Behav Med. 2003;10:181-190.
9. Li SF, Greenwald PW, Gennis P, et al. Effect of age on acute pain perception of a standardized stimulus in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:644-647.
10. Kjettrup-Jensen M, Sjogren P, Ekholm O, et al. Identifying a long-term/chronic, non-cancer pain population using a one-dimensional verbal pain rating scale: an epidemiological study. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:145-152.
11. Unruh A, Rithie J, Merskey H. Does gender affect appraisal of pain and pain coping strategies. Clin J Pain. 1999;15:31-40.
12. Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, et al. Factors influencing neck pain intensity in whiplash-associated disorders. Spine. 2006;31:E98-E104.
13. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1153-1157.
14. Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, et al. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:287-290.
15. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimeters? Pain. 1997;72:95-97.
16. Ware JJ, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
17. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1989.
18. Carroll L, Mercado AC, Cassidy JD, et al. A population-based study of factors associated with combinations of active and passive coping with neck and low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:67-72.
19. Administration NHTS. Characteristics of Fatal Rollover Crashes. Washington, DC: National Center for Statistics and Analysis Research and Development (NCSA). 2002. Report no. DOT HS 8094387.
20. Singleton M, Qin H, Luan J. Factors associated with higher levels of injury severity in occupants of motor vehicles that were severely damaged in traffic crashes in Kentucky, 2000-2001. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004;5:144-150.
21. Swedish Work Environment Authority, Statistics Sweden. The work environment 2003. In: Sweden S, ed. Authority SWE. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 2004.
22. Swedish Work Environment Authority, Statistics Sweden. Information about education and labour market 2001:2. Negative stress and illness. The effect of high demands, low control and lack of social support. In: Sweden S, ed. Authority SWE. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 2001.
23. Fejer R, Jordan A, Hartvigsen J. Categorising the severity of neck pain: establishment of cut-points for use in clinical and epidemiological research. Pain. 2005;119:176-182.
24. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196:129-136.
25. Martikainen P, Bartley M, Lahelma E. Psychosocial determinants of health in social epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1091-1093.
26. Borrell-Carrio F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:576-582.
27. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Kemppainen P, et al. Review of aetiological concepts of temporomandibular pain disorders: towards a biopsychosocial model for integration of physical disorder factors with psychological and psychosocial illness impact factors. Eur J Pain. 2005;9:613-633.