Factors influencing neck pain intensity in whiplash-associated disorders

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2006, Pages

  Holm, Lena W ^a   Carroll, Linda J ^b   Cassidy, J David ^c,d   Ahlbom, Anders ^a,e  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e Stockholm Centre of Public Health   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Insurance; Motor vehicle collision; Neck injury; Pain intensity; Whiplash associated disorders

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HEAD POSITION; HEADACHE; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECK PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SYMPTOM; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WHIPLASH INJURY;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; NECK PAIN; ODDS RATIO; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WHIPLASH INJURIES;

EID: 33644840897     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000199901.52053.87     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Spitzer W, Skovron M, Salmi L, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on whiplash-associated disorders: Redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine 1995;15:1S-73S.
2. Radanov BP, Sturzenegger M, Di Stefano G. Long-term outcome after whiplash injury: A 2-year follow-up considering features of injury mechanism and somatic radiologie and psychosocial findings. Medicine 1995;74:281-97.
3. Mayou R, Bryant B. Psychiatry of whiplash neck injury. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:441-8.
4. Partheni M, Constantoyannis C, Ferrari R, et al. A prospective cohort study of the outcome of acute whiplash injury in Greece. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:67-70.
5. Obelieniene D, Schrader H, Bovim G, et al. Pain after whiplash: A prospective controlled inception cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999:279-83.
6. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, et al. A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 2001;26:E445-58.
7. Berglund A. On Associations Between Different factors and Whiplash Injury. Epidemiological Studies on Risk of Initial and Future Complaints [thesis]. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet; 2002.
8. Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Côté P, et al. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1179-86.
9. Radanov B, Sturzenegger M, Stefano GD, et al. Relationship between early somatic radiological cognitive and psychosocial findings and outcome during a one-year follow-up in 117 patients suffering from common whiplash. Br J Rheumatol 1994:442-8.
10. Kjettrup-Jensen M, Sjogren P, Ekholm O, et al. Identifying a long-term/ chronic, non-cancer pain population using a one-dimensional verbal pain rating scale: An epidemiological study. Eur J Pain 2004;8:145-52.
11. Li SF, Greenwald PW, Gennis P, et al. Effect of age on acute pain perception of a standardized stimulus in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:644-7.
12. Soares JJ, Sundin O, Grossi G. Age and musculoskeletal pain. Int J Behav Med 2003;10:181-90.
13. Unruh A, Rithie J, Merskey H. Does gender affect appraisal of pain and pain coping strategies. Clin J Pain 1999;15:31-40.
14. Jensen M, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117-26.
15. Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, et al. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:287-90.
16. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153-7.
17. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 1997;72:95-7.
18. Ware JJ, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
19. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regressioned. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1989.
20. SPSS 12.0.1 for Windows [computer program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2003.
21. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population. Spine 2000;25:1109-17.
22. Evans L. Traffic Safety and the Driver. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1991.
23. Krafft M. When do AIS 1 neck injuries result in long-term, consequences? Vehicle and human factors. Traffic Inj Prev 2002;3:89-97.
24. Macintyre S, Hunt K, Sweeting H. Gender differences in health: Are things really as simple as they seem? Soc Sci Med 1996;42:617-24.
25. Macintyre S, Ford G, Hunt K. Do women 'over-report' morbidity? Men's and women's responses to structured prompting on a standard question on long standing illness. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:89-98.
26. Anson O, Paran E, Neumann L, et al. Gender differences in health perceptions and their predictors. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:419-27.
27. Celentano D, Linet M, Stewart W. Gender differences in the experience of headache. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:1289-95.
28. Carroll L, Mercado AC, Cassidy JD, et al. A population-based study of factors associated with combinations of active and passive coping with neck and low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:67-72.
29. Jensen I, Nygren A, Gamberale F, et al. Coping with long-term musculoskeletal pain and its consequences: s gender a factor? Pain 1994;57:167-72.