Optimal thresholds and discriminatory power of 48-h wireless esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosisof GERD

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1862-1869

  Wenner, Jörgen ^a   Johansson, Jan ^a   Johnsson, Folke ^a   Öberg, Stefan ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING; ESOPHAGITIS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROSCOPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PH ELECTRODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS; ROC CURVE;

ADULT; ESOPHAGEAL PH MONITORING; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34548131611     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01269.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EMM. Clinical esophageal pH recording: A technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1996 110 : 1982 96.
2. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005 100 : 190 200.
3. Johnsson F, Joelsson B, Isberg PE. Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1987 28 : 1145 50.
4. Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, et al. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: Normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 1992 87 : 1102 11.
5. Venables TL, Newland RD, Patel AC, et al. Omeprazole 10 milligrams once daily, omeprazole 20 milligrams once daily, or ranitidine 150 milligrams twice daily, evaluated as initial therapy for the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997 32 : 965 73.
6. Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, et al. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)-acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003 17 : 537 45.
7. Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johansson J, et al. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: Results from a randomized cross-over trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 102 : 239 45.
8. Wong WM, Bautista J, Dekel R, et al. Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/per-oral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring-a randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 21 : 155 63.
9. Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE, et al. Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 1999 44 : 2263 9.
10. Pandolfino JE, Bianchi LK, Lee TJ, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology predicts susceptibility to exercise-induced reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 : 1430 6.
11. Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, et al. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci 1988 33 : 1127 33.
12. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978 8 : 283 98.
13. Wenner J, Johnsson F, Johansson J, et al. Wireless oesophageal pH monitoring: Feasibility, safety and normal values in healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005 40 : 768 74.
14. Csendes A, Maluenda F, Braghetto I, et al. Location of the lower oesophageal sphincter and the squamous columnar mucosal junction in 109 healthy controls and 778 patients with different degrees of endoscopic oesophagitis. Gut 1993 34 : 21 7.
15. Kahrilas PJ, Lin S, Chen J, et al. The effect of hiatus hernia on gastro-oesophageal junction pressure. Gut 1999 44 : 476 82.
16. Weusten BL, Roelofs JM, Akkermans LM, et al. The symptom-association probability: An improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology 1994 107 : 1741 5.
17. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974 62 : 325 32.
18. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 1993 39 : 561 77.
19. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982 143 : 29 36.
20. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver- operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 2000 45 : 23 41.
21. Dent J. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management-the Genval Workshop Report. Gut 1999 44 (Suppl 2 S1 16.
22. Schindlbeck NE, Heinrich C, Konig A, et al. Optimal thresholds, sensitivity, and specificity of long-term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 1987 93 : 85 90.
23. Campos GM, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 1999 3 : 292 300.
24. Jackson PG, Gleiber MA, Askari R, et al. Predictors of outcome in 100 consecutive laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Am J Surg 2001 181 : 231 5.
25. Galmiche JP, Clouse RE, Balint A, et al. Functional esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006 130 : 1459 65.
26. Howard PJ, Maher L, Pryde A, et al. Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, and mucosal acid sensitivity are three separate, though related, aspects of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1991 32 : 128 32.
27. Shi G, Bruley des Varannes S, Scarpignato C, et al. Reflux related symptoms in patients with normal oesophageal exposure to acid. Gut 1995 37 : 457 64.
28. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Curvers WL, et al. Determinants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation. Gut 2006 55 : 313 8.
29. Tack J, Fass R. Review article: Approaches to endoscopic-negative reflux disease: Part of the GERD spectrum or a unique acid-related disorder? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004 19 (Suppl 1 28 34.
30. Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, et al. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 : 740 9.
31. Tseng D, Rizvi AZ, Fennerty MB, et al. Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure. J Gastrointest Surg 2005 9 : 1043 51 discussion 1051-2.