Significantly improved lumbar arthroplasty placement using image guidance: Technical note

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 2027-2030

  Marshman, Laurence A G ^a,e   Friesem, Tai ^a   Rampersaud, Y Raja ^b,c   Le Huec, Jean Charles ^d   Krishna, Manoj ^a   Reddy, Guru R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c Krembil Neuroscience Centre   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^e Pollard Cottage   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Image guidance arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 34548129305     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181316292     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer R, et al. Randomised control trial of the Cahrite artificial disc vs fusion for single level lumbar degenerative disc disease: a two year follow-up study. Spinal Arthroplasty Society, Vienna, May 2004.
2. Guyer RD, Burd TA, Hochschuler SH, et al. Total disc replacement: implants and clinical results. In: Guyer RD, Zigler JE, eds. Spinal Arthroplasty, a New Era in Spine Care. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2005:180-222.
3. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective randomised multicentre food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: II. Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1576-83.
4. Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS, et al. Orientation and osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joint. Clin Orthop 2001;385:88-94.
5. Smith HE, Vaccaro AR, Yuan PS, et al. The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:22-7.
6. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21:995-1000.
7. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8:210-7.
8. Mathews HH, Eisermann L, Le Huec J-C, et al. Total disc arthroplasty using Maverick total disc replacement. In: Guyer RD, Zigler JE, eds. Spinal Arthroplasty, a New Era in Spine Care. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2005:224-38.
9. Gertzbein SD, Holtby R, Tile M, et al. Determination of a locus of instantaneous centers of rotation of the lumbar spine by Moiré fringes: a new technique. Spine 1984;9:409-13.
10. Seligman JV, Getzbein SD, Tile M, et al. Computer analysis of spinal segment motion in degenerative disc disease with and without axial loading. Spine 1984;9:566-73.
11. Lemaire JP. Charite III intervertebral disc prosthesis clinical and radiological results with a series of 100 cases over 10 years follow up. Spinal Arthroplasty Society, Scottsdale, AZ, May 2003.
12. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001;26:122-9.
13. Deen HG, Nottmeier EW. Balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures: report of three cases. Neurosurg Focus 2005;18:E7.