A multicenter, randomized, open study to evaluate the impact of an electronic data capture system on the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1967-1979

  Huffstutter, Joseph ^a,e   Craig, W David ^b   Schimizzi, Gregory ^b   Harshbarger, John ^b   Lisse, Jeffrey ^c   Kasle, Shelley ^c   Hymson, Lisa ^c   Yocum, David ^c   Castro, Lesley ^c   Hegedus, Ronald ^d   Callegari, Peter ^d   Yeilding, Newman ^d   Gilmer, Keith ^d  

^a Arthritis Associates   (United States)

^b Carolina Arthritis Associates   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d CENTOCOR INC   (United States)

^e Arthritis Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic data capture system; Health tracker; Patient satisfaction; Patient physician interaction; Rheumatoid arthritis

Indexed keywords

ADALIMUMAB; ANTIRHEUMATIC AGENT; DISEASE MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG; ETANERCEPT; INFLIXIMAB; RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRY EYE; DYSPNEA; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INFECTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTION; PAIN; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERICARDITIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; RHEUMATOLOGY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; SELF REPORT; THORAX PAIN; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 34548127708     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1185/030079907X210624     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Bieber C, Muller KG, Blumenstiel K, et al. Long-term effects of a shared decision-making intervention on physician-patient interaction and outcome in fibromyalgia. A qualitative and quantitative 1 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63:357-66
2. Dobkin PL, De Civita M, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Patient-physician discordance in fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1326-34
3. Walker EA, Katon WJ, Keegan D, et al. Predictors of physician frustration in the care of patients with rheumatological complaints. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1997;19:315-23
4. Vegni E, Visioli S, Moja EA. When talking to the patient is difficult: the physician's perspective. Commun Med 2005;2:69-76
5. Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, et al. The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:243-52
6. Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, et al. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995;33:1176-87
7. Ishikawa H, Hashimoto H, Yano E. Patients' preferences for decision making and the feeling of being understood in the medical encounter among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:878-83
8. Beisecker AE, Beisecker TD. Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care 1990;28:19-28
9. Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1414-20
10. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA 1984;252:2990-4
11. Rao JK, Weinberger M, Anderson LA, et al. Predicting reports of unmet expectations among rheumatology patients. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:215-21
12. DiMatteo MR. The role of the physician in the emerging health care environment. West J Med 1998;168:328-33
13. Schwenk TL, Romano SE. Managing the difficult physician-patient relationship. Am Fam Physician 1992;46:1503-9
14. Wu RC, Delgado D, Costigan J, et al. Pilot study of an Internet patient-physician communication tool for heart failure disease management. World Hosp Health Serv 2006;42:32-8
15. Schneider J, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, et al. Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:1096-103
16. Antoni CE, Maini R, Grunke M, et al. Cooperative on quality of life in rheumatic diseases: results of a survey among 6000 patients across 11 European countries. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:S76
17. Brekke M, Hjortdahl P, Kvien TK. Involvement and satisfaction: a Norwegian study of health care among 1024 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 1509 patients with chronic noninflammatory musculoskeletal pain. Arthritis Care Res 2001;45:8-15
18. Reilly CA. Examining the symptom experience of hospitalized patients using a pen-based computer. Proc AMIA Symp 1999;364-8
19. Berry DL, Trigg LJ, Lober WB, et al. Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part I: development and pilot testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 2004;31:E75-83
20. Hsu J, Huang J, Fung V, et al. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:474-80
21. Delgado DH, Costigan J, Wu R, et al. An interactive Internet site for the management of patients with congestive heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2003;19:1381-5
22. Greenwood MC, Hakim AJ, Carson E, et al. Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:66-71
23. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, et al. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980;23:137-45
24. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220-33
25. Cooperating Clinics Committee of American Rheumatism Association. A seven-day variability study of 499 patients with peripheral rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1965;8:302-34
26. Ward J, Williams HJ, Egger MJ, et al. Comparison of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1993;26:1303-15
27. Castro L, Yocum D, Huffstutter E, et al. Advance profiling of anti-rheumatic therapies trial: feasibility and use of touchscreen computers for patient reported outcomes (PROs). Ann Rheum Dis, 2005;64:1383
28. Feldman SR, Krueger GG. Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:ii65-8
29. Clinical development programs for drugs, devices, and biological products intended for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). U.S. Food and Drug Administration web site. Available from http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/ 2199dft.htm, updated May 12, 2002 [Last accessed 27 Mar 2007]
30. van Coevorden AM, van Sonderen E, Bouma J, et al. Assessment of severity of hand eczema: discrepancies between patient- and physician-rated scores. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:1217-22
31. US Department of Health and Human Services. Handout on health: RA. NIH publication No. 04-4179, revised May 2004
32. High patient satisfaction achieved with patient-controlled analgesia. Drug Ther Perspect 1998;11:10-3
33. Oei-Lim VL, Kalkman CJ, Makkes PC, et al. Patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients. Anesth Analg 1998;86:967-72
34. Perry F, Parker RK, White PF, et al. Role of psychological factors in postoperative pain control and recovery with patient-controlled analgesia. Clin J Pain 1994;10:57-63
35. Borgeat A, Tewes E, Biasca N, et al. Patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with ropivacaine after major shoulder surgery: PCIA vs PCA. Br J Anaesth 1998;81:603-5
36. Clever SL, Ford DE, Rubenstein LV, et al. Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care 2006;44:398-405
37. Oberto M, Kasle S, Hymson L, et al. Disease education using a graphic cumulative record (health tracker) reduces differences in patient and clinician assessments of rheumatoid arthritis joint activity. American College of Rheumatology annual conference; November 12-17, 2005; San Diego, California [abstract F56]
38. Cvetkovski RS, Jensen H, Olsen J, et al. Relation between patients' and physicians' severity assessment of occupational hand eczema. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:596-600
39. Chassany O, Le-Jeunne P, Duracinsky M, et al. Discrepancies between patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes in chronic venous disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Value Health 2006;9:39-46
40. Platt FW, Keating KN. Differences in physician and patient perceptions of uncomplicated UTI symptom severity: understanding the communication gap. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:303-8