Assessing offender needs and performance for planning and monitoring criminal justice drug treatment

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1179-1187

  Roberts, Edward A ^a,c   Contois, Michael W ^a   Willis Sr , James C ^a   Worthington, Mary Rose ^a   Knight, Kevin ^b  

^a CiviGenics Inc

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CiviGenics Inc

Author keywords

Clinical application; Instrumentation; Intake assessment; Therapeutic communities; Treatment performance; Treatment planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548107664     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854807304350     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Buhringer, G. (2006). Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: Clinical art or science? Addiction, 101, 646-652.
2. Carey, K.B., Purnine, D.M., Maisto, S.A., & Carey, M.P. (1999). Assessing readiness to change. Substance abuse: A critical review of instruments. Clinical Psychology, 6, 245-266.
3. DiClemente, C.C. (1999). Motivation for change: Implications for substance abuse treatment. Psychological Science, 10, 209-213.
4. Farabee, D., Simpson, D.D., Dansereau, D., & Knight, K. (1995). Cognitive inductions into treatment among drug users on probation. Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 669-682.
5. Garner, B.R., Knight, K., Flynn, P.M., Morey, J.T., & Simpson, D.D. (2007). Measuring offender attributes and engagement in treatment using the Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1113-1130.
6. Hiller, M.L., Knight, K., Leukefeld, C., & Simpson, D.D. (2002). Motivation as a predictor of therapeutic engagement in mandated residential substance abuse treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 56-75.
7. Joe, G.W., Broome, K.M., Rowan-Szal, G.A., & Simpson, D.D. (2002). Measuring patient attributes and engagement in treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 183-196.
8. Knight, K., Garner, B.R., Simpson, D.D., Morey, J.T., & Flynn, P.M. (2006). An assessment for criminal thinking. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 159-177.
9. Knight, K., Simpson, D.D., & Hiller, M.L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal, 79, 337-351.
10. Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 575-594.
11. McLellan, A.T., McKay, J.R., Forman, R., Cacciola, J., & Kemp, J. (2005). Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: From retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction, 100, 447-458.
12. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). (2006). Principles of drug abuse treatment for criminal justice populations: A research-based guide (NIH Publication No. 06-5316). Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
13. Shearer, R. (2003). What doesn't work in the "what works" approach. Texas Journal of Corrections, 29, 10-14.
14. Simpson, D.D. (2004). A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 99-121.
15. Simpson, D.D. (2006, August). A plan for planning treatment. Counselor: A Magazine for Addiction Professionals, 7 (4). 20-28.
16. Simpson, D.D., & Joe, G.W. (2004). A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 89-97.
17. Simpson, D.D., Joe, G.W., & Broome, K.M. (2002). A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 538-544.
18. Taxman, F.S., & Bouffard, J.A. (2000). The importance of systems issues in improving offender outcomes: Critical elements of treatment integrity. Justice Research and Policy, 2 (2). 9-30.
19. Welsh, W.N. (2006). The need for a comprehensive approach to program planning, development, and evaluation. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 604-614.