Will 3D virtual dissection display prove to be the display format for reviewing CT colonography examinations?

Radiology

Volumn 244, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 629-630

  Glick, Seth ^a  

^a PENN PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34548103051     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2443070748     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. AGA Clinical Practice and Economics Committee. Position of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute on computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2006;131: 1627-1628.
2. Rex DK, Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1410-1413.
3. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1025-1033.
4. Kim SH, Lee JM, Fun HW, et al. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 2007;244:852-864.
5. Bar-Meir S, Wallace MB. Diagnostic colonoscopy: the end is coming. Gastroenterology 2006;131:992-994.
6. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200.
7. Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1151-1158.
8. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG. CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1745-1749.
9. Halligan S, Douglas DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiological performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1690-1699.