Critical success factors for e-learning and institutional change - Some organisational perspectives on campus-wide e-learning

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 840-850

  White, Su ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b Learning Societies Lab

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

BLENDED LEARNING; EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34548095927     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00760.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bailey, P. (1996). Technology supported learning: attitudes to technology in teaching, learning and assessment. Plymouth, UK : University of Plymouth.
2. Barnett, L., Maier, P. Hothi, J. (1998). Reviewing IT use for teaching and other purposes at the University of Southampton. Internal report. University of Southampton.
3. Becher, T. Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham : Open University Press in association with the Society for Research into Higher Education.
4. Doughty, G. (1994). Using learning technologies: interim conclusions from the TILT project. Glasgow : University of Glasgow.
5. Elton, L. (1999). New ways of learning in higher education: managing the change. Tertiary Education and Management, 5, 3, 207 225.
6. Follett, B. (1993). Libraries Review Group: report (the Follett Report). Bristol, UK : Joint Funding Council.
7. Geoghegan, W. H. (1994). Whatever happened to instructional technology? In S. Bapna, A. Emdad J. Zaveri (Eds 22nd Annual Conference of the International Business Schools Computing Association (IBSCA) (pp. 438 447). Baltimore, MD : IBM.
8. Geoghegan, W. H. (1998). Instructional technology and the mainstream: the risks of success. In D. G. Oblinger S. C. Rush (Eds The future compatible campus: planning designing and implementing information technology in the academy (pp. 131 150). Bolton, MA : Anker.
9. Hall, W., Hutchings, G. White, S. (1995). Breaking down the barriers: an architecture for developing and delivering resource based learning materials. World Conference on Computers in Education, Birmingham, UK. The conference was held in July 1995.
10. Hammond, N., Gardner, N., Heath, S., Kibby, M., Mayes, T., McAleese, R., Mullings, C. Trapp, A. (1992). Blocks to the effective use of information technology in higher education. Computers and Education, 18, 1 3, 155 162.
11. HEFCE (1996). Evaluation of the teaching and learning technology programme. Bristol, UK : Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).
12. HEFCE (2001). 01/37 strategies for learning and teaching in higher education: a guide to good practice. Bristol, UK : HEFCE.
13. HEFCE (2005). HEFCE strategy for e-learning 2005/12. Bristol, UK : HEFCE. Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2005/05_12/
14. Hooper, R. (1977). The National Development Programme in Computer Assisted Learning: Final Report of the Director. London : Council for Educational Technology.
15. JISC (1995). Guidelines for developing an information strategy. Bristol, UK : Joint Information Systems Committee.
16. Kiesler, S. Sproull, L. (1987). Computing and change on campus. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
17. King, T. Radtke, A. (1995). Critical factors in the adoption of computer aided learning in higher education. CAL'95, Cambridge: University of Cambridge. The conference was held in April 1995.
18. Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. London : Tavistock Publications in collaboration with Routledge & K. Paul.
19. MacFarlane, A. G. J. (1992). Teaching and learning in an expanding higher education system. Edinburgh : Committee of Scottish University Principals.
20. MacFarlane, A. G. J. (1995). Future patterns of teaching and learning. In T. Schuller (Ed The changing university? Buckingham : Open University/SRHE.
21. McNaught, C. Kennedy, P. (2000). Staff development at rmit: bottom-up work serviced by top-down investment and policy. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 8, 1, 4 18.
22. Moore, G. (1991). Crossing the chasm: marketing and selling technology products to mainstream customers. New York : Harper Business.
23. Nicolle, P. S. (2005). Technology adoption into teaching and learning by mainstream university faculty: a mixed methodology study revealing the 'how, when, why, and why not. In Educational leadership, research & counselling. Louisiana State University. PhD Thesis.
24. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation. London : Macmillan.
25. Salmon, G. (2005). Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. ALT-J, 13, 3, 201 218.
26. Surry, D. W. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, 2, 145 153.
27. Trowler, P. (1998). Academics responding to change new higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Buckingham : Society for Research into Higher Education Open University Press.
28. Turpin, S. (1994). TLTP institutional case studies. Bristol, UK : TLTP.
29. Twigg, C. A. (2001). Innovations in online learning: moving beyond no significant difference, Troy, NY, Center for Academic Transformation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Accessed July 4th 2007, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/ Monographs/Mono4.pdf.
30. White, S. (1993). Scholar - a campus wide structure for multimedia learning. In R. Hoey (Ed AETT Annual Conference: Designing for learning. Jordanhill Campus, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow : Kogan Page. The conference was held in April 1993.
31. White, S. (2000). Quality assurance and learning technologies: intersecting agendas in UK higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 8, 1, 7 15.
32. White, S. Maier, P. (1998). Building models which enable change: an examination of the teaching and learning technology support network. In Bringing information technology to education BITE (pp. 117 123). Maastricht : University of Maastricht. The conference was held in March 1998.
33. White, S. A. (2006). Higher education and learning technologies: an organisational perspective. In Electronics and computer science. Southampton, UK : University of Southampton. PhD Thesis.
34. White, S. A. Liccardi, I. (2006). Harnessing insight into disciplinary differences to refine e-learning design. 36th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education. San Diego CA: IEEE. Accessed July 4th 2007, from http://fie.engrng. pitt.edu/fie2006/papers/1784.pdf. The conference was held in October 2006.