When oprah intervenes: Political correlates of daytime talk show viewing

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 228-244

  Glynn, Carroll J ^a   Huge, Michael ^a   Reineke, Jason B ^a   Hardy, Bruce W ^b   Shanahan, James ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548077741     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838150701304662     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abt, V., & Seesholtz, M. (1994). The shameless world of Phil, Sally and Oprah: Television talk shows and the deconstructing of society. Journal of Popular Culture, 28, 195-215.
2. Austin, E. W., & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects on judgments on news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 973-983.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2002). Positive and negative feedback In politics. In F. R. Baumgartner and B. D. Jones (Eds.), Policy dynamics (pp. 3-28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Collins, M. (2003, March 11). Television; savage makeover; the left is a casualty as MSNBC gears up for war. The Boston Herald, p. 37.
5. Converse, P. E., & Marcus, G. (1979). Adynamic simultaneous equations model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73, 1055-1070.
6. Davis, R., & Owen, D. (1998). New media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Gamson, J. (1998). Freaks talk back: Tabloid talk shows and sexual nonconformity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television's contribution to political orientation. Journal of Communication, 32(2) 100-127.
9. Greenberg, B., Sherry, J., Busselle, R., Hnilo, L., & Smith, S. (1997). Daytime television talk shows: Guests, content, and interactions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 412-426.
10. Greenberg, B., & Smith, S. (1995, November). The content of television talk shows. Report prepared for the Kaiser Family Foundation.
11. Hardy, B. W., Scheufele, D. A., & Wang, Z. (2005, May). Defining deliberation: Key determinants and distinct dimensions. Paper presented at the 2005 annual conference of the International Communication Association. New York.
12. Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Hofstetter, C. R. (1998). Political talk radio, situational involvement, and political mobilization. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 273-286.
15. Ilie, C. (2001). Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 209-254.
16. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
17. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Communication and Opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 167-197.
18. Kwak, N., Wang, X., & Guggenheim, L. (2004, August). Linking all the way: The relationship between television entertainment talk show viewing and political engagement among young adults. Paper presented to the annual meeting for the Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Toronto.
19. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas, (pp. 95-118). New York: Harper.
20. Leiby, R. (2005, April 7). The reliable source. The Washington Post, p. C3.
21. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
22. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Manga, J. E. (2003). Talking trash: The cultural politics of daytime talk shows. New York: New York University Press.
24. McCombs, M. E. (2005). The agenda setting function of the press. In G. Overholser and K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The press (pp. 156-168). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-185.
26. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58-67.
27. Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hess, V. K. (2004, May). Priming effects of late-night comedy. Paper presented to the annual conference of the International Communication Association. New Orleans, LA.
28. Nabi, R. L., & Hendricks, A. (2003). The persuasive effect of host and audience reaction shots in television talk shows. Journal of Communication, 53(3), 527-543.
29. Nordlinger, J. (2000, June 19). Rosie O'Donnell, political activist - a celebrity and her platform. National Review. Retrieved March 11, 2005, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_11_52/ai_62838140
30. Pan, Z. D., & Kosicki, G. (1997). Talk show exposure as an opinion activity. Political Communication, 14, 371-388.
31. Potter, W. J. (1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 159-174.
32. Potter, W. J. (1988). Perceived reality in television effects research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 32, 23-41.
33. Robinson, B. E. (1982). Family experts on television talk shows: Facts, values, and half-truths. Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family & Child Studies, 31, 369-378.
34. Rössler, P., & Brosius, H. B. (2001). Do talk shows cultivate adolescents' views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 143-163.
35. Scheufele, D. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297-316.
36. Scott, G. G. (1996). Can we talk: The power and influence of talk shows. New York: Plenum.
37. Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers: Cultivation theory and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
38. Shape Our World. (2006, May 8). The people who shape our world. Time, 167(19), 48.
39. Shapiro, M. A., & Lang, A. (1991). Making television reality: Unconscious process In the construction of social reality. Communication Research, 18, 685-705.
40. Shattuc, J. M. (1997). The talking cure: TV talks shows and women. New York: Routledge.
41. Shrum, L.J. (1995). Accessing the social influence of television: Asocial cognition perspective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22, 402-429.
42. Shrum, L. J. (1996). Psychological processes underlying cultivation effects: Further tests of construct availability. Human Communication Research, 22, 482-509.
43. Sniderman, P. M, Brody, R. E., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Striphas, T. (2003). The dialectic with the everyday: Communication and cultural politics on Oprah Winfrey's book club. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(3), 295-316.
45. Woo, H., & Dominick, J. R. (2003). Acculturation, cultivation, and daytime TV talk shows. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 109-127.