Tempest in a TC: Changing treatment providers for in-prison therapeutic communities

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1168-1178

  Saum, Christine A ^a,b   O'Connell, Daniel J ^b   Martin, Steven S ^b   Hiller, Matthew L ^c   Bacon, Grant A ^b   Simpson, D Dwayne ^d  

^a ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Client counselor rapport; Engagement; Motivation; Provider change; Therapeutic community

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548065265     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854807304349     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bell, D.C., Montoya, I.D., & Atkinson, J.S. (1997). Therapeutic connection and client progress in drug treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 215-224.
2. Broome, K.M., Knight, K., Hiller, M.L., & Simpson, D.D. (1996). Drug treatment process indicators for probationers and prediction of recidivism. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 487-491.
3. Butzin, C.A., Martin, S.S., & Inciardi, J.A. (2005). Treatment during transition from prison to community and subsequent illicit drug use. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28, 351-358.
4. De Leon, G. (1997). Community as method: Therapeutic communities for special populations and special settings. Westport, CT: Praeger.
5. De Leon, G. (2000). The therapeutic community: Theory, model, and methods. New York: Springer.
6. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., Cartier, J., Wexler, H., Knight, K., & Anglin, D.M. (1999). Barriers to implementing effective correctional drug treatment programs. The Prison Journal, 79, 150-162.
7. Garland, B. (2002). Prison treatment staff burnout: Consequences, causes and prevention. Corrections Today, 64 (7). 116-121.
8. Garner, B.R., Knight, K., Flynn, P.M., Morey, J.T., & Simpson, D.D. (2007). Measuring offender attributes and engagement in treatment using the Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1113-1130.
9. Knight, K., Simpson, D.D., & Hiller, M.L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal, 79, 337-351.
10. Lehman, W.E.K., Greener, J.M., & Simpson, D.D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 197-209.
11. Linhorst, D.M., Knight, K., Johnston, J.S., & Trickey, M. (2001). Situational influences on the implementation of a prison-based therapeutic community. The Prison Journal, 81, 436-453.
12. Martin, S.S., Butzin, C.A., Saum, C.A., & Inciardi, J.A. (1999). Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware: From prison to work release to aftercare. The Prison Journal, 79, 294-320.
13. Melnick, G., & De Leon, G. (1999). Clarifying the nature of therapeutic community treatment: The Survey of Essential Elements Questionnaire (SEEQ). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16, 307-313.
14. Sacks, J.Y., McKendrick, K., & Kressel, D. (2007). Measuring offender progress in treatment using the Client Assessment Inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1131-1142.
15. Simpson, D.D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 171-182.
16. Simpson, D.D. (2004). A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 99-121.
17. Simpson, D.D., & Dansereau, D.F. (in press). Assessing organizational functioning as a step toward innovation. NIDA Science & Practice Perspectives.
18. Simpson, D.D., & Flynn, P.M. (in press). Research to practice: The road of change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.
19. Simpson, D.D., & Knight, K. (2007). Offender needs and functioning assessments from a national cooperative research program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1105-1112.
20. Wexler, H.K., Melnick, G., & Cao, Y. (2004). Risk and prison substance abuse treatment outcomes: A replication and challenge. The Prison Journal, 84, 106-120.