Reproductive interference in two ground-hopper species: Testing hypotheses of coexistence in the field

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1449-1460

  Gröning, Julia ^a   Lücke, Niklas ^a   Finger, Alexander ^a   Hochkirch, Axel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; DISPERSION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INSECT; MICROHABITAT; NICHE; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SYMPATRY;

TETRIX; TETRIX SUBULATA;

EID: 34548032793     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15850.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press.
2. Andrews, R. H. et al. 1982. Reproductive interference between three parapatric species of reptile tick Oecologia 52 : 281 286.
3. Anonymous 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. - R Development Core Team 2006. http://www.R-project.org
4. Atkinson, W. D. Shorrocks, B. 1984. Aggregation of larval Diptera over discrete and ephemeral breeding sites: the implications for coexistence Am. Nat. 124 : 336 351.
5. Boyer, S. Rivault, C. 2006. Habitat selection and coexistence of invasive cockroach species (Dictyoptera) in sugar-cane field on Réunion island Acta Oecol. 29 : 16 26.
6. Brown, W. L. Wilson, E. O. 1956. Character displacement Syst. Zool. 7 : 49 64.
7. Bull, C. M. Burzacott, D. 1994. Reproductive interactions between two Australian reptile tick species Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18 : 555 565.
8. Calcagno, V. et al. 2006. Coexistence in a metacommunity: the competition-colonization tradeoff is not dead Ecol. Lett. 9 : 897 907.
9. Crawley, M. J. 2005. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley.
10. Dukas, R. et al. 2006. Courtship of male insects: when is learning advantageous? Anim. Behav. 72 : 1395 1404.
11. Ficetola, G. F. De Bernardi, F. 2005. Interspecific social interactions and breeding success of the frog Rana latastei: a field study Ethology 111 : 764 774.
12. Fujimoto, H. et al. 1996. Reproductive interference between Panonychus mori Yokoyama and P. citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) in peach orchards Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31 : 59 65.
13. Gause, G. F. 1934. The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins.
14. Gherardi, F. Cioni, A. 2004. Agonism and interference competition in freshwater decapods. Behaviour 141 : 1297 1324.
15. Gotelli, N. J. and Entsminger, G. L. 2001. EcoSim: Null models software for ecology (ver. 7.0). - Acquired Intelligence Inc. and Kesey-Bear. http://homepages.together.net/∼gentsmin/ecosim.htm.
16. Gray, D. A. 2005. Does courtship behavior contribute to species-level reproductive isolation in field crickets? Behav. Ecol. 16 : 202 206.
17. Grein, G. 2005. Rote Liste der in Niedersachsen und Bremen gefährdeten Heuschrecken, 3. Fassung Inf.dienst. Nat.schutz. Niedersachs. 25 : 1 20.
18. Gröning, J. et al. 2005. Dornschrecken (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) auf den Ostfriesischen Inseln - Verbreitung, Koexistenz und Ökologie Entomol. Heute 17 : 47 63.
19. Gröning, J. et al. 2006. Habitat preferences of an endangered insect species, Cepero's ground-hopper (Tetrix ceperoi). - Ecol. Res. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0315-2.
20. Hanski, I. 1981. Coexistence of competitors in patchy environments with and without predation Oikos 37 : 306 312.
21. Hastings, A. 1980. Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space Theor. Popul. Biol. 18 : 363 373.
22. Hettyey, A. Pearman, B. 2003. Social environment and reproductive interference affect reproductive success in the frog Rana latastei Behav. Ecol. 14 : 294 300.
23. Hochkirch, A. et al. 2000. Specialized diet and feeding habits as key factors for the habitat requirements of the grasshopper species Tetrix subulata (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae) Entomol. Gen. 25 : 39 51.
24. Hochkirch, A. et al. 2006. Visual communication behavior of three pygmy grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) J. Insect. Behav. 19 : 559 571.
25. Hochkirch, A. et al. 2007. Intersexual niche segregation in Cepero's ground-hopper, Tetrix ceperoi. - Evol. Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10682-006-9147-3.
26. Hochkirch, A. et al. in press. Sympatry with the devil - reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. - J. Anim. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01241.x.
27. Ingrisch, S. Köhler, G. 1998. Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas. Westarp Wissenschaften.
28. Ives, A. R. 1988. Aggregation and the coexistence of competitors Ann. Zool. Fenn. 25 : 75 88.
29. Jackson, J. A. Tinsley, R. C. 1998. Reproductive interference in concurrent infections of two Protopolystoma species (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) Int. J. Parasitol. 28 : 1201 1204.
30. Kleukers, R. et al. 1997. De Sprinkhanen en Krekels van Nederland (Orthoptera). Nederlandse Fauna I. - KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland.
31. Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman.
32. Kuno, E. 1988. Aggregation pattern of individuals and the outcomes of competition within and between species: differential equation models Res. Popul. Ecol. 30 : 69 82.
33. Kuno, E. 1992. Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference Res. Popul. Ecol. 34 : 275 284.
34. McLain, D. K. Pratt, A. E. 1999. The cost of sexual coercion and heterospecific sexual harassment on the fecundity of a host-specific, seed-eating insect (Neacoryphus bicrucis) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46 : 164 170.
35. Oksanen, J. et al. 2005. The vegan Package. http://cc.oulu.fi/ ∼jarioksa/.
36. Parish, J. K. Edelstein-Keshet, L. 1999. Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary tradeoffs in animal aggregation Science 284 : 99 101.
37. Ribeiro, J. M. C. Spielman, A. 1986. The Satyr effect: a model prediciting parapatry and species extinction Am. Nat. 128 : 513 528.
38. Ruxton, G. D. Sherratt, T. N. 2006. Aggregation, defence and warning signals: the evolutionary relationship Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 273 : 2417 2424.
39. Ryan, M. J. Wagner, W. E. 1987. Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: female swordtail fish prefer heterospecific males Science 236 : 595 597.
40. Samways, M. J. 1977. Effect of farming on population movements and acoustic behaviour of two bush crickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) Bull. Entomol. Res. 67 : 471 481.
41. Schoener, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities Science 185 : 27 39.
42. Singer, F. 1990. Reproductive costs arising from incomplete habitat segregation among three species of Leucorrhinia dragonflys Behaviour 115 : 188 202.
43. Söderbäck, B. 1994. Reproductive interference between two co-occurring crayfish species, Astacus astacus and Pacifastacus leniusculus Nordic J. Freshwater Res. 69 : 137 143.
44. Tomaru, M. et al. 2000. Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make female receptive in D. melanogaster but not in D. sechellia Evolution 54 : 1286 1294.
45. Venables, W. N. Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer.
46. Verrel, P. A. 1994. Is decreased frequency of mating among conspecifics a cost of sympatry in salamanders? Evolution 48 : 921 925.
47. Wertheim, B. et al. 2000. Species diversity in a mycophagous insect community: the case of spatial aggregation vs resource partitioning J. Anim. Ecol. 69 : 335 351.
48. Westman, K. et al. 2002. Replacement of the native crayfish Astacus astacus by the introduced species Pacifastacus leniusculus in a small, enclosed Finnish lake: a 30-year study Ecography 25 : 53 73.
49. Winemiller, K. O. Pianka, E. R. 1990. Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes Ecol. Monogr. 60 : 27 56.
50. Zhang, J. et al. 2004. Influence of increasing number of mating partners on mating behaviour and reproduction in Brandt's voles Folia Zool. 53 : 357 365.