Intersexual niche segregation in Cepero's Ground-hopper, Tetrix ceperoi

Evolutionary Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 727-738

  Hochkirch, Axel ^a   Gröning, Julia ^a   Krause, Sascha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR TERRESTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Habitat preferences; Intersexual competition; Microhabitat choice; Sexual dimorphism; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

HABITAT SELECTION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; MULTIPLE MATING; NICHE; PREDATION RISK; REPRODUCTIVE COST; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOLAR RADIATION;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; TETRIX;

EID: 34848862487     PISSN: 02697653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-006-9147-3     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
2. Ardia DR, Bildstein KL (1997) Sex-related differences in habitat selection in wintering American kestrels, Falco sparverius. Anim Behav 53:1305-1311
3. Bolnick DI, Doebeli M (2003) Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433-2449
4. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1-28
5. Bon R, Rideau C, Villaret JC, Joachim J (2001) Segregation is not only a matter of sex in Alpine ibex, Capra ibex ibex. Anim Behav 62:495-504
6. Bowyer RT (2004) Sexual segregation in ruminants: definitions, hypotheses, and implications for conservation and management. J Mammal 85:1039-1052
7. Butler MA, Losos JB (2002) Multivariate sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Ecol Monogr 72:541-559
8. Butler MA, Schoener TW, Losos JB (2000) The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54:259-272
9. Calver MC, Bradley JS (1991) Can microhabitat selection explain sex-related colour morph frequencies in the grasshopper Acrida conica Fabricius? Anim Behav 41:1101-1102
10. Carothers JH (1984) Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in some herbivorous lizards. Am Nat 124:244-254
11. Chapman SJ (1990) Food selection. In: Chapman RF, Joern A (eds) Biology of grasshoppers. Wiley, New York, pp 39-72
12. Crawley MJ (2005) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester
13. Dixon KA (1989) Effect of leg type and sex on autotomy in the Texas bush katydid, Scudderia texensis. Can J Zool 67:1607-1609
14. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal condition, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 169:125-153
15. Forsman A, Appelqvist S (1999) Experimental manipulation reveals differential effects of color pattern on survival in male and female pygmy grasshopper. J Evol Biol 12:391-401
16. Gherardi F (2004) Resource partitioning between sexes in the "unconventional" hermit crab, Calcinus tubularis. Behav Ecol 15:742-747
17. Gröning J, Kochmann J, Hochkirch A (2005) Dornschrecken (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae) auf den Ostfriesischen Inseln-Verbreitung, Koexistenz und Ökologie. Entomologie heute 17:47-63
18. Gröning J, Krause S, Hochkirch A (in press) Habitat preferences of an endangered insect species, Cepero's Ground-hopper (Tetrix ceperoi). Ecol Res (in press)
19. Hedrick AV, Temeles EJ (1989) The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol 4:136-138
20. Hedrick PW (1993) Sex-dependent habitat selection and genetic polymorphism. Am Nat 141:491-500
21. Hochkirch A (1999) Leaf or stem?-Gender-specific differences in the whereabouts of Rhainopomma usambaricum (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Lentulidae). Mitt dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entmol 12:459-462
22. Hochkirch A, Deppermann J, Gröning J (2006) Visual communication behavior of three pygmy grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Tetrigidae). J Insect Behav 19:559-571
23. Hochkirch A, Folger M, Länder S, Meyer C, Papen M, Zimmermann M (1999) Habitatpräferenzen von Tetrix subulata (Linnaeus 1758) und Tetrix tenuicornis (Sahlberg 1893) in einer Sandkuhle bei Bremen (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae). Articulata 14:31-43
24. Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Loos T, Metzing C, Reichelt M (2000) Specialized diet and feeding habits as key factors for the habitat requirements of the grasshopper species Tetrix subulata (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae). Entomol Gen 25:39-51
25. Ingrisch S, Köhler G (1998) Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg
26. Jormalainen V, Tuomi J (1989) Sexual differences in habitat selection and activity of the colour polymorphic isopod Idotea baltica. Anim Behav 38:576-585
27. Kleukers R, van Nieukerken E, Odé B, Willemse L, van Wingerden W (1997) De Sprinkhanen en Krekels van Nederland (Orthoptera). Nederlandse Fauna I. KNNV Uitgeverij and EIS-Nederland, Leiden
28. Lande R (1980) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305
29. Lewin R (1985) Why are male hawks so small? Science 228:1299-1300
30. Lindenfors P, Székely T, Reynolds JD (2003) Directional changes in sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls and alces. J Evol Biol 16:930-938
31. Main MB, Weckerly FW, Bleich VC (1996) Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. J Mammal 77:449-461
32. Marshall JA, Haes ECM (1988) Grasshoppers and allied insects of Great Britain and Ireland. Harley books, Colchester Essex
33. Merilaita S, Jormalainen V (1997) Evolution of sex differences in microhabitat choice and colour polymorphism in Idotea baltica. Anim Behav 54:769-778
34. Merilaita S, Jormalainen V (2000) Different roles of feeding and protection in diel microhabitat choice of sexes in Idotea baltica. Oecologia 122:445-451
35. Nabours RK (1937) Methoden und Ergebnisse bei der Züchtung von Tetriginae. In: Abderhalden E (ed) Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden, Abteilung 9, vol 3, Urban & Schwarzenberg, Berlin, pp 1309-1365
36. Paul J (1988) Colour and pattern variation in Tetrix ceperoi Bolívar (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae): An aid to identification. Entomol Gaz 39:133-139
37. R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available via http://www.R-project.org
38. Reeve JP, Fairbairn DJ (1999) Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity. Heredity 83:697-706
39. Rowe L (1994) The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Anim Behav 48:1049-1056
40. Ruckstuhl KE (1998) Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in the bighorn sheep. Anim Behav 56:99-106
41. Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2000) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a new approach. Behav 137:361-377
42. Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2002) Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biol Rev 77:77-96
43. Schoener TW (1967) The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155:474-477
44. Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113-151
45. Shine R (1989) Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q Rev Biol 64:419-461
46. Shine R (1991) Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am Nat 138:103-122
47. Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622-630
48. Temeles EJ, Pan IL, Brennan JL, Horwitt JN (2000) Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science 289:441-443
49. Uvarov BP (1977) Grasshoppers and locusts: a handbook of general acridology, vol 2. University Press, Cambridge
50. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York