Minimizing femoral access complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: A proposed strategy of bony landmark guided femoral access, routine access site angiography and appropriate use of closure devices

Hellenic Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 127-133

  Tzinieris, Ioannis N ^a   Papaioannou, Georgios I ^a   Dragomanovits, Spyridon I ^a   Deliargyris, Efthymios N ^a  

^a ATHENS MEDICAL CENTER   (Greece)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Closure devices; Hematoma; Local complications

Indexed keywords

FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; BANDAGE; BLEEDING; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELASTICITY; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GROUPS BY AGE; HEMATOMA; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RETROPERITONEAL HEMORRHAGE; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMORAL ARTERY; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLESTICK INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLESTICK INJURIES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548017417     PISSN: 10117970     EISSN: 10117970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Heart Association: Heart disease and stroke statistics (2006 Update).
2. Samal AK, White CJ: Percutaneous management of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 12-23.
3. Exaire JE, Tcheng JE, Kereiakes DJ, et al: Closure devices and vascular complications among percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 373-374.
4. Applegate RJ, Grabarczyk MA, Little WC, et al: Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Cardiol 2002; 40: 78-83.
5. El-Jack SS, Ruygrok PN, Webster MW, et al: Effectiveness of manual pressure hemostasis following transfemoral coronary angiography in patients on therapeutic warfarin anticoagulation. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 485-489.
6. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A, et al: Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures. J Am Cardiol 2004; 44: 1200-1209.
7. Yang EH, Gumina RJ, Lennon RJ, et al: Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery for percutaneous coronary interventions: changes in the incidence, clinical characteristics, and indications from 1979 to 2003. J Am Cardiol 2005; 46: 2004-2009.
8. Tavris DR, Dey S, Albrecht B, et al: Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use - Phase II. J Invasive Cardiol 2005; 17: 644-650.
9. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al: Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 291: 350-357.
10. Simon A, Bumgarner B, Clark K, et al: Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care 1998; 7: 308-313.
11. Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST: Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 1118-1125.
12. Schickel SI, Adkisson P, Miracle V, et al: Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods. Am J Crit Care 1999; 8: 406-409.
13. Munoz OC, Jimenez J: Vascular Closure Devices. Interventional Cardiology Secrets. Hanley and Belfus 2003: pp 143-146.
14. Applegate RJ, Rankin KM, Little WC, et al: Restick following initial Angioseal use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 58: 181-184.
15. Eggebrecht H, Haude M, Woertgen U, et al: Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 57: 496.
16. Vaitkus PT: A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 243-246.
17. Lasic Z, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al: Comparison of safety and efficacy between first and second generation of angio-seal closure devices in interventional patients. J Invasive Cardiol 2004; 16: 356-358.
18. Michalis LK, Rees MR, Patsouras D, et al: A prospective randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of three commercially available closure decices (Angioseal, Vasoseal and Duett). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2002; 25: 423-429.
19. Baim DS: Percutaneous approach, including transseptal and apical puncture, in Baim DS, Grossman W (ed): Cardiac Catheterization, Angiography, and Intervention, 5th Edition. Williams and Wilkins, Maryland, 1996: pp 57-81.
20. Patel MR, Holmes DR Jr: Access site for cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 1-2.
21. Omar Farouque HM, Tremmel JA, Shabari FR, et al: Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices. J Am Cardiol 2005; 45: 363-368.
22. Garrett PD, Eckart RE, Bauch TD, et al: Fluoroscopic localization of the femoral head as a landmark for common femoral artery cannulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 65: 205-207.
23. Schnyder G, Sawhney N, Whisenant B, et al: Common femoral artery anatomy is influenced by demographics and comorbidity: implications for cardiac and peripheral invasive studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 289-295.
24. Spector KS, Lawson WE: Optimizing safe femoral access during cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 209-212.
25. Sherev DA, Shaw RE, Brent BN: Angiographic predictors of femoral access site complications: implication for planned percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 65: 196-202.