The cost of social agents

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 513-520

  Governatori, Guido ^a   Rotolo, Antonino ^b   Padmanabhan, Vineet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computational complexity; Defeasible logic; Intention; Obligation; Social agents

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; FORMAL LOGIC;

DEFEASIBLE LOGIC; INTENTION; OBLIGATION; SOCIAL AGENTS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 34247269708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1160633.1160728     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori, and M.J. Maher. A flexible framework for defeasible logics. In Proc. AAAI-2000, pages 401-405. AAAI/MIT Press, 2000.
2. G. Antoniou, D. Billington, G. Governatori, and M.J. Maher. Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 2(2):255-287, 2001.
3. N. Bassiliades, G. Antoniou, and I. Vlahavas. DR-DEVICE: A defeasible logic system for the Semantic Web. In H.J. Ohlbach and S. Schaffen, editors, Proc 2nd PPSWR, LNCS 3208, pages 134-148. Springer, 2004.
4. M.E. Bratman, D.J. Israel, and M.E Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349-355, 1988.
5. M.E. Bratman. Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, 1987.
6. J. Broersen, M. Dastani, J. Hulstijn, and L. van der Torre. Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(3-4):428-447, 2002.
7. M. Dastani, G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, and L. van der Torre. Preferences of agents in defeasible logic. In S. Zhang and R. Jarvis, editors, Proc. Australian AI05, LNAI 3809, pages 695-704. Springer, 2005.
8. M. Dastani, G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, and L. van der Torre. Programming cognitive agents in defeasible logic. In G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, editors, Proc. LPAR 2005, LNAI 3835, pages 621-636. Springer, 2005.
9. F. Dignum. Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7(1):69-79, 1999.
10. F. Dignum, D. Morley, L. Sonenberg, and L. Cavedon. Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In Proc 4th ICMAS, pages 111-118, 2000.
11. M. Garey and D. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman and Company, 1979.
12. R. Girle. Modal Logic and Philosophy. Acumen, 2000.
13. G. Governatori, V. Padmanabhan, A. Rotolo, and A. Sattar. A defeasible logic for modelling policy-based intentions and motivational attitudes, submitted, 2005.
14. G. Governatori and A. Rotolo. Defeasible logic: Agency, intention and obligation. In A. Lomuscio and D. Nute, editors, Deontic Logic in Computer Science, LNAI 3065, pages 114-128. Springer, 2004.
15. S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, and M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence, 44:167-207, 1990.
16. M.J. Maher. Prepositional defeasible logic has linear complexity. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 1(6):691-711, 2001.
17. M.J. Maher, A. Rock, G. Antoniou, D. Billignton, and T. Miller. Efficient defeasible reasoning systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 10(4):483-501, 2001.
18. D. Nute, editor. Defeasible Deontic Logic. Kluwer, 1997.
19. J. Pitt, editor. Open Agent Societies. Wiley, 2005.
20. A.S. Rao and M.P. Georgeff. Modelling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proc. KR'91, pages 473-484. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
21. G. Sartor. Legal Reasoning: A Cognitive Approach to the Law. Springer, 2005.
22. G.H. von Wright. Norm and Action. Routledge, 1963.