Sex differences in semantic processing: Event-related brain potentials distinguish between lower and higher order semantic analysis during word reading

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1987-1997

  Wirth, M ^a   Horn, H ^a   Koenig, T ^a   Stein, M ^a   Federspiel, A ^a   Meier, B ^b   Michel, C M ^c   Strik, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

ERP; Gender; Language processing; N400; P1; Semantic integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; READING; SEMANTICS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 34548009595     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl121     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Assadollahi R, Rockstroh B. 2005. Neuromagnetic brain responses to words from semantic sub- and supercategories. BMC Neurosci. 6:57.
2. Baxter LC, Saykin AJ, Flashman LA, Johnson SC, Guerin SJ, Babcock DR, Wishart HA. 2003. Sex differences in semantic language processing: a functional MRI study. Brain Lang. 84:264-272.
3. Bentin S. 1987. Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain Lang. 31:308-327.
4. Bentin S, Kutas M, Hillyard SA. 1993. Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. Psychophysiology. 30:161-169.
5. Brandeis D, Naylor H, Halliday R, Callaway E, Yano L. 1992. Scopolamine effects on visual information processing, attention, and event-related potential map latencies. Psychophysiology. 29:315-336.
6. Brandeis D, Vitacco D, Steinhausen HC. 1994. Mapping brain electric micro-states in dyslexic children during reading. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 56:239-247.
7. Brown CM, Hagoort P, Chwilla DJ. 2000. An event-related brain potential analysis of visual word priming effects. Brain Lang. 72:158-190.
8. Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P. 1995. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology. 32:274-285.
9. Cohen L, Dehaene S, Naccache L, Lehericy S, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Henaff MA, Michel F. 2000. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain. 123(Pt 2):291-307.
10. Coltheart M. 1981. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Q J Exp Psychol. 33:497-505.
11. Craik FIM, Lockhart RS. 1972. Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J Verb Learn Verb Behav. 11:671-684.
12. Curran T, Tucker DM, Kutas M, Posner MI. 1993. Topography of the N400: brain electrical activity reflecting semantic expectancy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 88:188-209.
13. DePaulo B, Bell M, Rosenthal R. 1979. Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In: Rosenthal R, editor. Skills in nonverbal communication. Cambridge (MA): Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain. p. 68-103.
14. Donchin E, Ritter W, McCallum WC. 1978. Cognitive psychophysiology: the endogenous components of the ERP. In: Callaway E, Tueting P, Koslow SH, editors. Event related brain potentials in man. New York: Academic Press. p. 349-411.
15. Esposito G, van Horn JD, Weinberger DR, Berman KF. 1996. Gender differences in cerebral blood flow as a function of cognitive state with PET. J Nucl Med. 37:559-564.
16. Fiebach CJ, Friederici AD, Muller K, von Cramon DY. 2002. fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:11-23.
17. Fodor JA. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
18. Foxe JJ, Murray MM, Javitt DC. 2005. Filling-in in schizophrenia: a high-density electrical mapping and source-analysis investigation of illusory contour processing. Cereb Cortex. 15:1914-1927.
19. Foxe JJ, Simpson GV. 2002. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans. A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Exp Brain Res. 142:139-150.
20. Friederici AD. 2004. Event-related brain potential studies in language. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 4:466-470.
21. Frost JA, Binder JR, Springer JA, Hammeke TA, Bellgowan PS, Rao SM, Cox RW. 1999. Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from functional MRI. Brain. 122:199-208.
22. Giesbrecht B, Camblin CC, Swaab TY. 2004. Separable effects of semantic priming and imageability on word processing in human cortex. Cereb Cortex. 14:521-529.
23. Grave de Peralta MR, Gonzalez AS, Lantz G, Michel CM, Landis T. 2001. Noninvasive localization of electromagnetic epileptic activity. I. Method descriptions and simulations. Brain Topogr. 14:131-137.
24. Guillem F, Mograss M. 2005. Gender differences in memory processing: evidence from event-related potentials to faces. Brain Cogn. 57:84-92.
25. Hager W, Hasselhorn M. 1994. Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen. Göttingen (Germany): Hogrefe.
26. Hampson E, Kimura D. 1992. Sex differences and hormonal influences on cognitive function in humans. In: Becker JB, Breedlove M, Crews D, editors. Behavioral endocrinology. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 357-398.
27. Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermuller F, Marslen-Wilson WD. 2006. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage. 30:1383-1400.
28. Herlitz A, Airaksinen E, Nordstrom E. 1999. Sex differences in episodic memory: the impact of verbal and visuospatial ability. Neuropsychology. 13:590-597.
29. Herlitz A, Nilsson LG, Backman L. 1997. Gender differences in episodic memory. Mem Cognit. 25:801-811.
30. Hill H, Ott F, Herbert C, Weisbrod M. 2005. Response execution in lexical decision tasks obscures sex-specific lateralization effects in language processing: evidence from event-related potential measures during word reading. Cereb Cortex. 16:978-989.
31. Holcomb PJ. 1993. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology. 30:47-61.
32. Holcomb PJ, Grainger J. 2006. On the time-course of visual word recognition: an event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. J Cogn Neurosci. 18:1631-1643.
33. Hyde JS, Linn MC. 1988. Gender differences in verbal ability: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 104:53-69.
34. Jacoby LL, Craik FIM. 1979. Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In: Cermak LS, Craik FIM, editors. Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum. p. 1-21.
35. Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ. 2001. Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Hum Brain Mapp. 14:166-185.
36. Klein D, Milner B, Zatorre RJ, Meyer E, Evans AC. 1995. The neural substrates underlying word generation: a bilingual functional-imaging study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:2899-2903.
37. Kotz SA, Cappa SF, von Cramon DY, Friederici AD. 2002. Modulation of the lexical-semantic network by auditory semantic priming: an event-related functional MRI study. Neuroimage. 17:1761-1772.
38. Krugman HE. 1966. The measurement of advertising involvement. Public Opin Q. 30:583-569.
39. Kutas M, Federmeier KD. 2000. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci. 4:463-470.
40. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 207:203-205.
41. Lehmann D. 1987. Principles of spatial analysis. In: Gevins AS, Rémond A, editors. Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Vol. 1. Amsterdam (the Netherlands): Elsevier. p. 309-354.
42. Lehmann D, Skrandies W. 1980. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 48:609-621.
43. Maitland SB, Herlitz A, Nyberg L, Backman L, Nilsson LG. 2004. Selective sex differences in declarative memory. Mem Cognit. 32:1160-1169.
44. McCarthy G, Nobre AC. 1993. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 88:210-219.
45. Meyers-Levy J, Maheswaran D. 1991. Exploring differences in males' and females' processing strategies. J Consum Res. 18:63-70.
46. Meyers-Levy J, Sternthal B. 1991. Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. J Mark Res. 28:84-96.
47. Meyers-Levy J, Tybout AM. 1989. Schema congruity as a basis of product evaluation. J Consum Res. 16:39-54.
48. Michel CM, Seeck M, Landis T. 1999. Spatiotemporal dynamics of human cognition. News Physiol Sci. 14:206-214.
49. Michel CM, Seeck M, Murray MM. 2004. The speed of visual cognition. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 57:617-627.
50. Michel CM, Thut G, Morand S, Khateb A, Pegna AJ, Grave dP, Gonzalez S, Seeck M, Landis T. 2001. Electric source imaging of human brain functions. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 36:108-118.
51. Ortigue S, Michel CM, Murray MM, Mohr C, Carbonnel S, Landis T. 2004. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words. Neuroimage. 21:1242-1251.
52. Ortigue S, Thut G, Landis T, Michel CM. 2005. Time-resolved sex differences in language lateralization. Brain. 128:E28.
53. Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koenig T, Kochi K, Merlo MC, Hell D, Koukkou M. 1999. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 90:169-179.
54. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. 1995. Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 42:658-665.
55. Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard SA, Johnson R Jr, Miller GA, Ritter W, Ruchkin DS, Rugg MD, et al. 2000. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology. 37:127-152.
56. Pugh KR, Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Bronen RA, Shankweiler DP, Katz L, Fletcher JM, et al. 1996. Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain. 119:1221-1238.
57. Pulvermuller F, Assadollahi R, Elbert T. 2001. Neuromagnetic evidence for early semantic access in word recognition. Eur J Neurosci. 13:201-205.
58. Pylkkanen L, Marantz A. 2003. Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends Cogn Sci. 7:187-189.
59. Rossell SL, Price CJ, Nobre AC. 2003. The anatomy and time course of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia. 41:550-564.
60. Schirmer A, Zysset S, Kotz SA, Yves vC. 2004. Gender differences in the activation of inferior frontal cortex during emotional speech perception. Neuroimage. 21:1114-1123.
61. Sereno SC, Brewer CC, O'Donnell PJ. 2003. Context effects in word recognition: evidence for early interactive processing. Psychol Sci. 14:328-333.
62. Sereno SC, Rayner K. 2003. Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends Cogn Sci. 7:489-493.
63. Sereno SC, Rayner K, Posner MI. 1998. Establishing a time-line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport. 9:2195-2200.
64. Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Bronen RA, Fletcher JM, Shankweiler DP, Katz L. 1995. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature. 373:607-609.
65. Skrandies W. 1998. Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning - a brain mapping study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 6:173-183.
66. Skrandies W, Reik P, Kunze C. 1999. Topography of evoked brain activity during mental arithmetic and language tasks: sex differences. Neuropsychologia. 37:421-430.
67. Sommer IE, Aleman A, Bouma A, Kahn RS. 2004. Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain. 127:1845-1852.
68. St George M, Kutas M, Martinez A, Sereno MI. 1999. Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain. 122:1317-1325.
69. Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD. 1998. Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 108:406-413.
70. Stuss DT, Picton TW, Cerri AM. 1988. Electrophysiological manifestations of typicality judgment. Brain Lang. 33:260-272.
71. Taylor MJ, Smith ML, Iron KS. 1990. Event-related potential evidence of sex differences in verbal and nonverbal memory tasks. Neuropsychologia. 28:691-705.
72. Ullman MT, Estabrooke I, Steinhauer K, Brovetto C, Pancheva R, Ozawa K, Mordecai K, Maki P. 2002. Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. Brain Lang. 83:141-143.
73. Walla P, Hufnagl B, Lindinger G, Deecke L, Lang W. 2001. Physiological evidence of gender differences in word recognition: a magneto-encephalographic (MEG) study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 12:49-54.
74. Weisbrod M, Kiefer M, Winkler S, Maier S, Hill H, Roesch-Ely D, Spitzer M. 1999. Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 8:289-298.
75. Zwitserlood P. 1989. The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition. 32:25-64.