Cerebral organization of component processes in reading

Brain

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1221-1238

  Pugh, Kenneth R ^a,b   Shaywitz, Bennett A ^a   Shaywitz, Sally E ^a   Constable, R Todd ^a   Skudlarski, Pawel ^a   Fulbright, Robert K ^a   Bronen, Richard A ^a   Shankweiler, Donald P ^b,d   Katz, Leonard ^b,d   Fletcher, Jack M ^c   Gore, John C ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

fMRI; Orthography; Phonology; Reading; Semantic processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGANIZATION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEX DIFFERENCE; STRIATE CORTEX; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 9544235295     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.4.1221     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Blumstein SE, Baker E, Goodglass H. Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1977; 15: 19-30.
2. Carr TH, Pollatsek A. Recognizing printed words: a look at current models. In: Besner D, Waller TG, MacKinnon GE, editors. Reading research: advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5. Orlando: Academic Press, 1985; 1-82.
3. Coltheart M, Curtis B, Atkins P. Haller M. Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychol Rev 1993; 100: 589-608.
4. Constable RT, McCarthy G, Allison T, Anderson AW, Gore JC. Functional brain imaging at 1.5T using conventional gradient echo MR imaging techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 451-9.
5. Crossman DL, Polich J. Hemispheric differences for orthographic and phonological processing. Brain Lang 1988; 35: 301-12.
6. Crowder RG. Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum. 1976.
7. Demonet JF, Chollet F, Ramsay S, Cardebat D, Nespoulous JL, Wise R, et al. The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects. Brain 1992; 115: 1753-68.
8. Demonet JF, Price C, Wise R, Frackowiak RSJ. A PET study of cognitive strategies in normal subjects during language tasks: influence of phonetic ambiguity and sequence processing on phoneme monitoring. Brain; 1994 117: 671-82.
9. Friston K J, Frith CD, Liddle P F, Frackowiak R S J. Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13: 5-14.
10. Hart J Jr, Gordon B. Delineation of single-word semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia with anatomical correlation Ann Neurol 1990; 27: 226-31.
11. Henderson VW. Anatomy of posterior pathways in reading: a reassessment. [Review]. Brain Lang 1986; 29: 119-33.
12. Johnson NF, Pugh KR. A cohort model of visual word recognition. Cognit Psychol 1994; 26: 240-346.
13. Kimura D. Are men's and women's brains really different? Canadian Psychology 1987; 28: 133-47.
14. Kimura D Cognitive function: sex differences and hormonal influence. In: Smith B, Adelman G, editors. Neuroscience year: supplement 2 to the Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Boston: Birkhauser, 1992; 41-3.
15. Liberman IY, Liberman AM. Whole language versus code emphasis: underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. In: Gough PB, Ehri LC, Treiman R, editors. Reading acquisition. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum 1992; 343-66.
16. Luh KE, Levy J. Interhemispheric cooperation: left is left and right is right but sometimes the twain shall meet. J Expt Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995; 21: 1243-58.
17. Lukatela G, Turvey MT. Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform 1991; 17: 951-66.
18. Lukatela G, Turvey MT. Similar attentional frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform 1993; 19: 166-78.
19. Lukatela G Turvey MT Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words homophones and pseudohomophones. J Exp Psychol Gen 1994; 123: 107-28.
20. Lukatela G, Carello C, Savic M, Turvey MT. Hemispheric asymmetries in phonological processing Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 341-50.
21. McCarthy G, Blamire AM, Rothman DL,. Gruetter R, Shulman RG. Echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging studies of frontal cortex activation during word generation in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 4952-6.
22. McClelland JL On the time relations of mental processes: an examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychol Rev 1979; 86: 287-330.
23. McGlone J. Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey. Behav Brain Sci 1980; 3: 215-27.
24. Milner B. Hemispheric specialization: scope and limits. In: Schmitt FO, Worden FG, editors. The neurosciences: third study program. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press 1974, 75-89.
25. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14: 68-78.
26. Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R, Ellermann JM, Kim SG, Merkle H, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 5951-5.
27. Patterson K, Besner D. Is the right hemisphere literate? Cogn Neuropsychol 1984; 1: 315-41.
28. Paulesu E, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory [see comments]. Nature 1993; 362: 342-5. Comment in: Nature 1993; 363: 583-4.
29. Perfetti CA, Bell L. Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: evidence from backward masking and priming. J Mem Language 1991; 30: 473-85.
30. Petersen SE, Fiez JA. The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography. [Review]. Ann Rev Neurosci 1993; 16: 509-30.
31. Petersen SE, Fox PT, Posner MI, Mintun M, Raichle ME. Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1: 153-70.
32. Petersen SE, Fox PT, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME. Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science 1990; 249: 1041-4.
33. Posner MI. Editor's note: attention as a cognitive neurosystem. J Cognit Neurosci 1991; 3: 303.
34. Price C, Wise RJ, Watson JDG, Patterson K, Howard D, Frackowiak RSJ. Brain activity during reading: the effects of exposure duration and task. Brain 1994; 117: 1255-69.
35. Pugh KR, Rexer K, Katz L. Evidence of flexible coding in visual word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform 1994; 20: 807-25.
36. Schad LR, Trostt U, Knopp MV, Muller E, Lorenz WJ. Motor cortex stimulation measured by magnetic resonance imaging on a standard 15T clinical scanner Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 461-4.
37. Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol Rev 1989; 96: 523-68.
38. Sergent J, Zuck E, Levesque M, MacDonald B. Positron emission tomography study of letter and object processing: empirical findings and methodological considerations. Cereb Cortex 1992; 2: 68-80.
39. Shankweiler D, Liberman IY, Mann SL, Fowler CA, Fischer FW. The speech code and learning to read. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem 1979; 5: 531-45.
40. Shaywitz BA, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Shaywitz SE, Bronen RA, Fulbright RK, et al. Localization of semantic processing using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Map 1995a; 2: 10-20
41. Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, et al. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language [see comments]. Nature 1995b; 373: 607-9. Comment in: Nature 1995; 373: 561-2.
42. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1988.
43. Van Orden GC, Goldinger SD. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. [Review]. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform 1994; 20: 1269-91.
44. Van Orden GC, Pennington BF, Stone GO. Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. [Review]. Psychol Rev 1990; 97: 488-522,
45. Wise R, Chollet F, Hadar U, Friston K, Hoffner E, Frackowiak R, Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. Brain; 1991; 114: 1803-17.
46. Zaidel E, Aboitiz F, Clarke J, Kaiser D, Matteson R. Sex differences in interhemispheric relations for language. In: Kitterle FL, editor. Hemispheric communication: mechanisms and models. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995; 85-175.
47. Zatorre RJ, Evans AC, Meyer E, Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing Science 1992; 256: 846-9.