An integrated approach to feature invention and model construction for drug activity prediction

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 227, Issue , 2007, Pages 217-224

  Davis, Jesse ^a   Costa, Vítor Santos ^b   Ray, Soumya ^c   Page, David ^d  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; DRUG PRODUCTS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEINS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BINDING AFFINITIES; FEATURE INVENTION; RELATIONAL LEARNING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 34547973746     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1273496.1273524     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Brint, A., & Willett, P. (1987). Algorithms for the identification of three-dimensional maximal common substructures. J. Chemical Informatics and Computer Sciences, 27, 152-158.
2. Cheng, J., Hatzis, C., Hayashi, H., Krogel, M.-A., Morishita, S., Page, D., & Sese, J. (2002). KDD Cup 2001 report. SIGKDD Explorations, 3, 47-64.
3. Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988). Comparative molecular field analysis (ComFA). Effect on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 110, 5959-5967.
4. Davis, J., Burnside, E., Dutra, I. C., Page, D., & Costa, V. S. (2005). An integrated approach to learning Bayesian networks of rules. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 84-95). Springer.
5. Dietterieh, T. G., Lathrop, R. H., & Lozano-Perez, T. (1997). Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial Intelligence, 89, 31-71.
6. Finn, P., Muggleton, S., Page, D., & Srinivasan, A. (1998). Pharmacophore discovery using the inductive logic programming system PROGOL. Machine Learning, 30: Special issue on applications and the knowledge discovery process, Kohavi and Provost (Eds), 241-270.
7. Fletcher, R. (1980). Practical methods of optimization, vol. 1: Unconstrained Optimization, chapter 3. John Wiley and Sons.
8. Jain, A., Dietterich, T., Lathrop, R., Chapman, D., Critchlow, R., Bauer, B., Webster, T., & Lozano-Pérez, T. (1994a). Compass: a shape-based machine learning tool for drug design. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 8, 635-652.
9. Jain, A., Koile, K., Bauer, B., & Chapman, D. (1994b). Compass: Predicting biological activities from molecular surface properties. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 37, 2315-2327.
10. Landwehr, N., Kersting, K., & Raedt, L. D. (2005). nFOIL: Integrating Naive Bayes and FOIL. Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 795-800).
11. Landwehr, N., Passerini, A., Raedt, L. D., & Frasconi, P. (2006). kFOIL: Learning simple relational kernels. Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
12. Marchand-Geneste, N., Watson, K., Alsberg, B., & King, R. (2002). New approach to pharmacophore mapping and QSAR analysis using inductive logic programming. Application to thermolysin inhibitors and glycogen phosphorylase b inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 45, 399-409.
13. Maron, O. (1998). Learning from ambiguity. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
14. Martin, Y., Bures, M., Danaher, E., DeLazzer, J., Lico, I., & Pavlik, P. (1993). A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists. J. Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 7, 83-102.
15. McGaughey, G. B., & Mewshaw, R. E. (1999). Application of comparative molecular field analysis to dopamine d2 partial agonists. Bioorganic Medical Chemistry, 7, 2453-2456.
16. Muggleton, S. (1995). Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13, 245-286.
17. Ray, S., & Page, D. (2001). Multiple instance regression. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 425-432). Morgan Kaufmann.
18. Srinivasan, A., Page, D., Camacho, R., & King, R. (2006). Quantitative pharmacophore models with Inductive Logic Programming. Machine Learning Journal, 64, 65-90.
19. Vapnik, V. (1999). The nature of statistical learning theory. Statistics for Engineering and Information Science. Springer.