Job compensable factors and factor weights derived from job analysis data

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 104, Issue 3 II, 2007, Pages 1193-1204

  Chi, Chia Fen ^a   Chang, Tin Chang ^b   Hsia, Ping Ling ^a   Song, Jen Chieh ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b Asia University

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; EMPLOYMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATION; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TAIWAN; WORK; WORKLOAD;

EMPLOYMENT; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; OCCUPATIONS; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS; TAIWAN; WORKLOAD;

EID: 34547950578     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PMS.104.4.1193-1204     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ATCHISON, T. J., BELCHER, D. W., & THOMSEN, D. J. (2000) Job evaluation methods, internet based benefits and compensation administration. Nashville, TN: Economic Research Institute.
2. BYARS, L. L., & RUE, L. W. (2003) Human resource management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 290-306.
3. CHI, C-F. (1999) A study on job placement for handicapped workers using job analysis data. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, 337-351.
4. CHI, C-F., & LIN, Y-T. (1998) Ratings of 830 jobs on 45 characteristics: factor and cluster analyses into age-enhanced, age-neutral and age-counteracted, and age-impaired categories. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 803-816.
5. DAS, B., & GARCIA-DIAZ, A. (2001) Factor selection guidelines for job evaluation: a computerized statistical procedure. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 40, 259-272.
6. DAVIS, K. R., & SAUSER, W. I. (1993) A comparison of factor weighting methods in job evaluation: implications for compensation systems. Public Personnel Management, 22, 91-106.
7. GARY, M. W (1992) Pay equity through job evaluation: a case study. Compensation and Benefits Review, 24, 46-51.
8. GUPTA, N., & JENKINS, G. D. (2001) Practical problems in using job evaluation systems to determine compensation. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 133-144.
9. MADIGAN, R. M., & HOOVER, D. J. (1986) Effects of alternative job evaluation methods on decisions involving pay equality. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 84-100.
10. MCCORMICK, E. J., JEANNERET, P. R., & MECHAM, R. C. (1972) A study of job characteristics and job dimensions as based on the position analysis questionnaire (PAQ). Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 56, 347-368.
11. PETERSON, N. G., MUMFORD, M. D., BORMAN, W. C., JEANNERET, P. R., FLEISHMAN, E. A., LEVIN, K. Y. (2001) Understanding work using the occupational information network (O*NET): implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451-492.
12. PIERCE, B. (1999) Using the National Compensation Survey to predict wage rates. Compensation and Working Conditions, Winter, 8-16.
13. PLACHY, R. G. (1986) Compensation management cases and applications: the point-factor job evaluation system: a step-by-step guide: Part 1. Building a fair pay program. New York: ANACOM. Pp. 146-216.
14. TOMPKINS, J., BROWN, J., & MCEWEN, J. H. (1990) Designing a comparable worth based job evaluation system: failure of an a priori approach. Public Personnel Management, 19, 31-42.
15. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, (1977) Dictionary of occupational titles. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
16. VAN SLIEDREGT, T., VOSKUIJL, O. F., & THIERRY, H. (2001) Job evaluation systems and pay grade structures: do they match? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 1313-1324.
17. ZOLLITSCH, H. G., & LANGSNER, A. (1970) Wage and salary administration. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.