A neural network approach for attenuation relationships: An application using strong ground motion data from Turkey

Engineering Geology

Volumn 93, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 65-81

  Güllü, Hamza ^a   Erçelebi, Ergun ^a  

^a GAZIANTEP UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Attenuation equation; Peak ground acceleration; Regression analysis

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUMERICAL METHODS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFT COMPUTING;

ATTENUATION EQUATION; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION;

SEISMOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BACK PROPAGATION; CORRELATION; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; PEAK ACCELERATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; STRONG MOTION;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 34547946011     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Abrahamson N., and Sommerville P. Effects of the hanging wall and footwall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86 (1996) 93-99
2. Abrahamson N.A., and Silva W.J. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters vol. 68 (1) (1997), Seismological Society of America 94-127
3. Abrahamson N.A., and Shedlock K. Overview, ground motion attenuation relations. Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 (1997) 9-23
4. Ansal A., and Lav M.A. Effects of geotechnical factors in 1992 Erzincan earthquake. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, Ouest Editions vol. 1 (1995) 667-674
5. Aydan Ö. Comparison of suitability of submerged tunnel and shield tunnel for subsea passage of Bosphorus. Jeol. Muhendis. 25 1 (2001) 1-17 (in Turkish)
6. Aydan Ö., and Hasgur Z. The Characteristics of Acceleration Waves of Turkish Earthquakes. Ulusal Deprem Muhendisligi Kongresi, Ankara, Deprem Muhendisligi Turk Milli Komitesi vol. 4 (1997) 30-37 (in Turkish)
7. Aydan Ö., Sezaki M., and Yarar R. The seismic characteristics of Turkish earthquakes. 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico (1996) CD Paper no. 1025
8. Bard P.-Y., and Gariel J. The seismic response of two-dimensional sedimentary deposits with large vertical velocity gradients. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76 (1986) 343-346
9. Beroza G., and Mikuma T. Short slip duration in dynamic rupture in the presence of heterogeneous fault properties. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (1996) 22,449-22,460
10. Boatwright J., and Boore D. Analysis of the ground accelerations radiated by the 1980 Livermore Valley earthquake for directivity and dynamic source characteristics. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72 (1982) 1843-1865
11. Bommer J.J. Uncertainty about the uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis. Opinion paper. Eng. Geol. 70 (2003) 165-168
12. Bommer J.J., Douglas J., and Strasser F.O. Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 1 (2003) 171-203
13. Bommer J.J., Scherbaum F., Fabrice C., Bungum H., and Sabett F. Discussion on 'Uncertainty Analysis of Strong-Motion and Seismic Hazard' R. Sigbjörnsson and N.N. Ambraseys. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2 (2004) 261-267
14. Boore D.M., and Joyner W.B. The influence of rupture incoherence on seismic directivity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 68 (1978) 283-300
15. Boore D.M., Joyner W.B., and Fumal T.E. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 1 (1997) 128-153
16. Bouchon M. The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from near-field strong motion data. J. Geophys. Res. 102 (1997) 11,731-11,744
17. Bozkurt E. Neotectonics of Turkey - a synthesis. Geodin. Acta 14 (2001) 3-30
18. Bray J.D., and Rodriguez-Marek A. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dyn. Earthqu. Eng. 24 (2004) 815-828
19. Campbell K.W. Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 6 (1981) 2039-2070
20. Campbell K.W. Empirical near source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 1 (1997) 154-179
21. Chandler A.M., Chan L.S., and Lam N.T.K. Deterministic seismic hazard parameters and engineering risk implications for the Hong Kong region. J. Asian Earth Sci. 20 (2001) 59-72
22. Chaturvedi D.K. Artificial neural network learning using improved genetic algorithms. J. Inst. Eng., India CP 82 (2001) 1-8
23. Chiou B., Power M., Abrahamson N., and Roblee C. An overview of the project of next generation of ground motion attenuation models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions. Fifth National Seismic Conference on Bridges and Highways, San Francisco, CA, September, Paper vol. B11 (2006) 18-20
24. Cramer C.H. A seismic hazard uncertainty analyses for the Madrid seismic zone. Eng. Geol. 62 (2001) 251-256
25. Day S. Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: the effect of non-uniform prestress. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72 (1982) 1881-1902
26. Day S.M., Bielak J., Dreger D., Graves R., Larsen S., Olsen K.B., Pitarka A., and Ramirez L. Numerical simulation of basin effects on long-period ground motion. Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA (2006)
27. Douglas J. Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Sci. Rev. 61 1-2 (2003) 43-104
28. Douglas J. Ground motion estimation equations 1964-2003. Imperial College, Research Report Number: 04-001-SM (2004)
29. Douglas J., and Smit P.M. How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be?. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91 6 (2001) 1917-1923
30. Durukal E., Erdik M., Avci J., Yuzugulu O., Alpay Y., Avar B., Zulfikar C., Biro T., and Mert A. Analysis of the strong motion data of the 1995 Dinar, Turkey earthquake. Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthqu. Eng. 17 (1998) 557-578
31. Ellis G.W., Yao C., and Zhao R. Neural network modelling of the mechanical behaviour of sand. Proceedings of Nineth Conference ASCE Engng Mech ASCE, New York (1992) 421-424
32. Erdik M., Doyuran V., Gulkan P., and Akkas N. A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117 (1985) 295-344
33. Ewald M., Igel H., Hinzen K.-G., and Scherbaum F. Basin-related effects on ground motion for earthquake scenarios in the Lower Rhine Embayment. Geophys. J. Int. 166 (2006) 197-212
34. Fletcher R. Practical Methods of Optimization. 2nd ed. (1990), John Wiley & Sons
35. Fletcher R., and Reeves C.M. Function minimization - by conjugate gradients. Comput. J. (1964) 149-154
36. Ghabousi J., Garret Jr. J.H., and Wu X. Knowledge based modelling of material behaviour with neural networks. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 117 1 (1991) 132-153
37. Gülkan P., and Kalkan E. Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey. J. Seismol. 6 (2002) 397-409
38. Gülkan P., Kocyigit A., Yucemen M.S., Doyuran V., and Basoz N. Earthquake zoning map of Turkey based on most recent data. METU Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. 93-01 (1993) 156 pp. (in Turkish)
39. Gupta I.D. The state of the art in seismic hazard analysis. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Paper No. 428 vol. 39 (2002) 311-346
40. Hammerstrom D. Working with neural networks. IEEE Spectrum 30 7 (1993) 46-53
41. Hecht-Nielsen R. Theory of the backpropagation neural network. Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, Washington, DC vol. I (1989) 593-605
42. Hertz J., Krogh A., and Palmer R.G. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation (1991), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York
43. Ide S., and Takeo M. Determination of the constitutive relation of fault slip based on wave analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 102 (1997) 27, 379-27, 391
44. İnan E., Colakoglu Z., Koc N., Bayülke N., and Coruh E. Earthquake Catalogs with Acceleration Records from 1976 to 1996. General Directorate of Disaster Affairs, Earthquake Research Department, Ankara, Turkey (1996) 98 pp. (in Turkish)
45. Jackson J., and McKenzie D.P. Active tectonics of the Alpine Himalayan belt between western Turkey and Pakistan. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 77 (1984) 185-264
46. Joyner W.B., and Boore D.M. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 (1981) 2011-2038
47. Joyner W.B., and Boore D.M. Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics: 2. Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation (1988), ASCE, New York 43-102
48. Kaastra I., and Boyd M.S. Forecasting futures trading volume using neural networks. J. Futures Mark. 15 8 (1995) 953-970
49. King J., and Tucker B. Observed variations of earthquake motion across a sediment-filled valley. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74 (1984) 137-151
50. Klügel J.U. Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants. Eng. Geol. 78 (2005) 285-307
51. Kobayashi H., and Midorikawa S. A semi empirical method for stimulating response spectra of near field ground motions with regard to fault rupture. Proc. 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece, Sept (1982)
52. Kramer S. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering (1996), Prentice Hall 653 pp.
53. Krinitzsky E.L. How to combine deterministic and probabilistic methods for assessing earthquake hazard. Opinion paper. Eng. Geol. 70 (2003) 157-163
54. Maren A., Harston C., and Pap R. Handbook of Neural Computing Applications (1990), Academic Press, San Diego, California
55. Masters T. Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++ (1993), Academic Press, San Diego, California
56. McKenzie D.P. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean Region. Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc. 30 (1972) 109-185
57. Midorikawa S., and Kobayashi H. On estimation of strong earthquake motions with regard to fault ruptures. Proc. 2nd Intern Conf. on Microzonation vol. 2 (1978) 825-836
58. Müller B., and Reinhardt J. Neural Networks: An Introduction (1990), Springer-Verlag
59. Narendra B.S., Sivapullaiah P.V., Suresh S., and Omkar S.N. Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of soft grounds using computational intelligence techniques: a comparative study. Comput. Geotech. 33 (2006) 196-208
60. Pao Y.H. Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks (1989), Addison-Wesley, New York
61. Romero S.M., and Rix G.J. Ground motion amplification of soils in the upper Mississippi embayment. National Science Foundation Mid America Earthquake Center, Report No. GIT-CEE/GEO-01-1 (2001)
62. Ruff L.J. Dynamic stress drop of recent earthquakes: Variations within subduction zones. Pure Appl. Geophys. 154 (1999) 409-431
63. Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. Parallel Distributed Processing vol. I and II (1986), MIT, Cambridge
64. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., and Williams R.J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323 (1986) 533-536
65. Saroglu, F., Emre, O., Kuscu, I., 1992. Active fault map of Turkey. Printed by General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration.
66. Schwartz D., and Coppersmith K. Seismic Hazards: New trends in analysis using geological data. Active Tectonics (1986), National Academic Press 215-230
67. Shahin M.A., Jaksa M.B., and Maier H.R. Artificial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering. Aust. Geomech. 36 1 (2001) 49-62
68. Somerville P.G., and Graves R.W. Characterization of earthquake strong ground motion. Pure Appl. Geophys. 160 (2003) 1811-1828
69. Somerville P.G., Smith N.F., Graves R.W., and Abrahamson N.A. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 (1997) 199-222
70. Sucuoǧlu H. Engineering characteristics of the near-field strong motions from the 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce Earthquakes in Turkey. J. Seismol. 6 (2002) 347-355
71. Stein R.S., Barka A., and Dietrich J.H. Progressive failure on the North Anatolian Fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int. 128 (1997) 594-604
72. Tokar S.A., and Johnson P.A. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng. 4 3 (1999) 232-239
73. Tsai C.-C.P. Ground motion modeling for seismic hazard analysis in the near-source regime: an asperity model. Pure Appl. Geophys. 149 (1997) 265-297
74. Tsai C.-C.P. Engineering ground motion modeling in the near-source regime using the specific barrier model for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys. 152 (1998) 107-123
75. Twomey J.M., and Smith A.E. Validation and verification. In: Kartam N., Flood I., and Garrett J.H. (Eds). Artificial Neural Networks for Civil Engineers: Fundamentals and Applications (1997), ASCE, New York 44-64
76. Ulusay R., Tuncay E., Sonmez H., and Gokceoglu C. An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey. Eng. Geol. 74 (2004) 265-291
77. Vidale J.E., and Helmberger D.V. Elastic finite-difference modeling of the 1971 San Fernando, California earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78 (1988) 122-141
78. Werbos, P.J., 1974. Beyond Regression: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. PhD thesis, Harvard University.
79. Werbos P.J. Back-propagation: Past and Future. Proceeding of International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA vol. 1 (1988) 343-354
80. Widrow B., and Hoff M.E. Adaptive Switching Circuits. IRE WESCON Convention Record, Part 4 (1960) 96-104
81. Zare ́ M., and Bard P.-Y. Strong motion dataset of Turkey: data processing and site classification. Soil Dyn. Earthqu. Eng. 22 (2002) 703-718
82. Zurada J.M. Introduction to Artificial Neural Systems (1992), West Publishing Company, St. Paul