Interactive curve resolution by using latent projections in polar coordinates

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 21, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 2-9

  Von Frese, J ^a,c   Kovalenko, S A ^b   Ernsting, N P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Almac Sciences   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Curve resolution; Heuristic evolving latent projections; Polar coordinates; Time resolved spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

CURVE FITTING;

CURVE RESOLUTION; HEURISTIC EVOLVING LATENT PROJECTIONS; MIXTURE COMPONENTS; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; POLAR COORDINATE; SIMPLE++; THREE-COMPONENT; TIME-RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY; TWO WAYS; TWO-COMPONENT;

TIME-RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 34547923118     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Liang YZ, Kvalheim OM. Resolution of two-way data: theoretical background and practical problem-solving. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2001; 370: 694-704.
2. Jiang JH, Liang YZ, Ozaki Y. Principles and methodologies of self-modelling curve resolution. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004; 71: 1-12.
3. de Juan A, Tauler R. Chemometrics applied to unravel multicomponent processes and mixtures. Revisiting latest trends in multivariate resolution. Anal Chim. Acta 2003; 500: 195-210.
4. Malinowski ER. Factor Analysis in Chemistry (3rd edn). John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2002.
5. Kvalheim OM, Liang YZ. Heuristic evolving latent projections: resolving two-way multicomponent data 1. Selectivity, latent projective graph, datascope, local rank and unique resolution. Anal. Chem. 1992; 64: 936-945.
6. Gurden SP, Brereton RG, Groves JA. Resolution of mid-infrared spectra by factor analysis using spherical projections: influence of noise, spectral similarity, wavelength resolution and mixture composition on success of the method. Analyst 1995; 120: 1107-1114.
7. Brereton RC. Deconvolution of mixtures by factor analysis. Analyst 1995; 120: 2313-2336.
8. Hamilton JC, Gemperline PJ. Mixture analysis using factor analysis II: self-modeling curve resolution. J. Chemometr. 1990; 4: 1-13.
9. Borgen OS, Davidsen N, Mingyang Z, Oyen O. The multivariate N-component resolution problem with minimum assumptions. Mikrochim. Acta 1986; 2: 63-73.
10. Maeder M. Evolving factor analysis for the resolution of overlapping chromatographic peaks. Anal. Chem. 1987; 59: 527-530.
11. Lawton WH, Sylvestre EA. Self modeling curve resolution. Technometrics 1971; 13: 617-633.
12. Windig W, Guilment J. Interactive self-modeling mixture analysis. Anal. Chem. 1991; 63: 1425-1432.
13. Cuesta Sánchez F, Toft J, van den Bogaert B, Massart DL. Orthogonal projection approach applied to peak purity assessment. Anal. Chem. 1996; 68: 79-85.
14. Windig W. Spectral data files for self-modeling curve resolution with examples using the Simplisma approach. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997; 36: 3-16. Data available from ftp://ftp.clarkson.edu/pub/hopkepk/ Chemdata/Windig/[16.03.2006].
15. Kovalenko SA, Ernsting NP, Ruthmann J. Femtosecond hole-burning spectroscopy of the dye DCM in solution: the transition from the locally excited to a charge-transfer state. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996; 258: 445-454.
16. Maeder M, Zuberbühler AD. Nonlinear least-squares fitting of multivariate absorption data. Anal. Chem. 1990; 62: 2220-2224.
17. de Braekeleer K, Massart DL. Evaluation of the orthogonal projection approach (OPA) and the SIMPLISMA approach on the windig standard spectral data sets. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997; 39: 127-141.