Recruiting diverse patients to a breast cancer risk communication trial - Waiting rooms can improve access

Journal of the National Medical Association

Volumn 99, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 917-922

  Bodurtha, Joann N ^a,b   Quillin, John M ^b   Tracy, Kelly A ^a   Borzelleca, Joseph ^c   McClish, Donna ^a,b   Wilson, Diane Baer ^b,c   Jones, Resa M ^a,b   Quillin, Julie ^b   Bowen, Deborah ^d  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical investigation; Women's health

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RACE DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WAITING ROOM; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK;

EID: 34547912533     PISSN: 00279684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Yancey AK, Ortega AN, Kumanyika SK. Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:1-28.
2. Ford JG, Howerton MW, Bolen S, et al. Knowledge and access to information on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials. Evidence Report/Technology assessment no. 122. AHRQ Publication No. 05-E019-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 1-230. www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/evidence/pdf/recruitcantrials/ recruit.pdf. Accessed 05/06.
3. Adams-Campbell LL, Ahaghotu C, Gaskins M, et al. Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: study design barriers. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:730-734.
4. Derose KP, Hawes-Dawson J, Fox SA, et al. Dealing with diversity: recruiting churches and women for a randomized trial of mammography promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27:632-648.
5. Keyzer JF, Melnikow J, Kuppermann M, et al. Recruitment strategies for minority participation: challenges and cost lessons from the POWER interview. Ethn Dis. 2005;15:395-406.
6. MacEntee MI, Wyatt C, Kiyak HA, et al. Response to direct and indirect recruitment for a randomized dental clinical trial in a multicultural population of elders. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:377-381.
7. O'Brien RL, Kosoko-Lasaki O, Cook CT, et al. Self-assessment of cultural attitudes and competence of clinical investigators to enhance recruitment and participation of minority populations in research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:674-682.
8. Paterniti DA, Chen MS Jr, Chiechi C, et al. Asian Americans and cancer clinical trials: a mixed-methods approach to understanding awareness and experience. Cancer. 2005;104:3015-3024.
9. Thompson EE, Neighbors HW, Munday C, et al. Recruitment and retention of African American patients for clinical research: an exploration of response rates in an urban psychiatric hospital. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:861-867.
10. Trauth JM, Jernigan JC, Siminoff LA, et al. Factors affecting older African American women's decisions to join the PLCO cancer screening trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8730-8738.
11. Hughes C, Peterson SK, Ramirez A, et al. Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1146-1155.
12. Fransen GA, van Marrewikk CJ, Mujakovic S, et al. Pragmatic trials in primary care. Methodological challenges and solutions demonstrated by the DIAMOND-study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:16-27.
13. Nazemi H, Larkin AA, Sullivan MD, et al. Methodological issues in the recruitment of primary care patients with depression. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2001;31:277-288.
14. Hoffman AM, Redding CA, Goldberg D, et al. Computer expert systems for African-American smokers in physicians offices: a feasibility study. Prev Med. 2006;43:204-211.
15. Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, et al. Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1729-1736.
16. Halbert CH, Brewster K, Collier A, et al. Recruiting African American women to participate in hereditary breast cancer research. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7967-7973.
17. Burns AC. The expanded Health Belief Model as a basis for enlightened preventive health care practice and research. J Health Care Mark. 1992;12:32-45.
18. U.S. Census Bureau, Systems Support Division. U.S. Census 2000. www. census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html. 2006. Accessed 05/06.
19. Goode M, Blewett L, Price A. 2004 Virginia health care insurance and access survey: Select results. http://gunston.gmu.edu/chpre/pdf/Virginia_ FinalReport_03_24_05.pdf. 2006. Accessed 05/06.
20. Svikis DS, Berger N, Haug NA, et al. Caffeine dependence in combination with a family history of alcoholism as a predictor of continued use of caffeine during pregnancy. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:2344-2351.
21. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1879-1886.
22. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. Breast cancer risk assessment tool. www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/. 2006. Accessed 05/2006.
23. Burke W, Austin MA. Genetic risk in context: Calculating the penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1185-1187.
24. Quillin JM, Fries E, McClish D, et al. Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions. J Behav Med. 2004;27:205-214.
25. Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK. Health Behavior and Health Education. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
26. Becker MH, Maiman LA, Kirscht JP, et al. The Health Belief Model and prediction of dietary compliance: a field experiment. J Health Soc Behav. 1977;18:348-366.
27. Microsoft. Microsoft® Access™ 2002. Microsoft Corp.; 2002.
28. SAS Institute I. Cary, NC: SAS®; 1997:9.1.
29. Olshansky E, Sacco D, Braxter B, et al. Participatory action research to understand and reduce health disparities. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53:121-126.
30. Rosenberg L, Wise LA, Palmer JR, et al. A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2628-2633.
31. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: Recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:355-361.
32. Bowen DJ, Alfano CM, McGregor BA, et al. The relationship between perceived risk, affect, and health behaviors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2004;28:409-417.
33. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk; shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:294-299.
34. Gramling R, Anthony D, Lowery J, et al. Association between screening family medical history in general medical care and lower burden of cancer worry among women with a close family history of breast cancer. Genet Med. 2005;7:640-645.
35. Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Daniel Mullins C, et al. Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30:24-33.
36. Bolen S, Tilburt J, Baffi C, et al. Defining "success" in recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: moving toward a more consistent approach. Cancer. 2006;106:1197-1204.
37. Handley MA, Hammer H, Schillinger D. Navigating the terrain between research and practice: a collaborative research network (CRN) case study in diabetes research. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19:85-92.
38. Curbow B, Fogarty LA, McDonnell KA, et al. The role of physician characteristics in clinical trial acceptance: testing pathways of influence. J Health Commun. 2006;11:199-218.