Sniff magnitude test: Relationship to odor identification, detection, and memory tests in a clinic population

Chemical Senses

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 515-523

  Tourbier, Isabelle A ^a   Doty, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; Odor identification; Odor memory; Odor threshold; Sniff magnitude; UPSIT

Indexed keywords

3 MERCAPTOPROPIONIC ACID; BUTANOL; BUTYRIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHYLTHIOBUTYRIC ACID; PENTYL ACETATE; PHENETHYL ALCOHOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANOSMIA; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY MEMORY; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SENSORY SYSTEM EXAMINATION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SMELLING DISORDER; SNIFF MAGNITUDE TEST; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODORS; OLFACTION DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL;

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 34547899861     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm020     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bailie JM. 2006. Clarifying the nature of the olfactory impairment found in patients with Parkinson's disease [dissertation]. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
2. Betchen SA, Doty RL. 1998. Bilateral detection thresholds in dextrals and sinistrals reflect the more sensitive side of the nose, which is not lateralized. Chem Senses. 23:453-457.
3. Cain WS, Rabin RD. 1989. Comparability of two tests of olfactory function. Chem Senses. 14:479-485.
4. Choudhury ES, Moberg P, Doty RL. 2003. Influences of age and sex on a microencapsulated odor memory test. Chem Senses. 28:799-805.
5. Deems DA, Doty RL. 1987. Age-related changes in the phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection threshold. Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 39: 646-650.
6. Doty RL. 1975. An examination of relationships between the pleasantness, intensity, and concentration of 10 odorous stimuli. Percept Psychophys. 17:492-496.
7. Doty RL. 1995. The Smell Identification Test™ Administration Manual. 3rd ed. Haddon Hts (NJ): Sensonics, Inc. p. 57.
8. Doty RL, Frye RE, Agrawal U. 1989. Internal consistency reliability of the fractionated and whole University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Percept Psychophys. 45:381-384.
9. Doty RL, Gregor TP, Settle RG. 1986. Influence of intertrial interval and sniff-bottle volume on phenyl ethyl alcohol odor detection thresholds. Chem Senses. 11:259-264.
10. Doty RL, Laing DG. 2003. Psychophysical measurement of olfactory function, including odorant mixture assessment. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of olfaction and gustation. New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 203-228.
11. Doty RL, McKeown DA, Lee WW, Shaman P. 1995. A study of the test-retest reliability of ten olfactory tests. Chem Senses. 20:645-656.
12. Doty RL, Newhouse MG, Azzalina JD. 1985. Internal consistency and short-term test-retest reliability of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Chem Senses. 10:297-300.
13. Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, Giberson R, Siksorski L, Rosenberg L. 1984. Smell identification ability: Changes with age. Science. 226: 1441-1443.
14. Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. 1984. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 32:489-502.
15. Doty RL, Smith R, McKeown DA, Raj J. 1994. Tests of human olfactory function: Principal components analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance. Percept Psychophys. 56:701-707.
16. Frank RA, Dulay MF, Gesteland RC. 2003. Assessment of the Sniff Magnitude Test as a clinical test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 78:195-204.
17. Frank RA, Dulay MF, Niergarth KA, Gesteland RC. 2004. A comparison of the sniff magnitude test and the University of Pennsylvania Smell identification Test in children and nonnative English speakers. Physiol Behav. 81:475-480.
18. Frank RA, Gesteland RC, Bailie J, Rybalsky K, Seiden A, Dulay MF. 2006. Characterization of the sniff magnitude test. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 132:532-536.
19. Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 6:65-70.
20. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. 1997. 'Sniffin' sticks': Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses. 22:39-52.
21. Johnson BN, Mainland JD, Sobel N. 2003. Rapid olfactory processing implicates subcortical control of an olfactomotor system. J Neurophysiol. 90:1084-1094.
22. Kobal G. 2003. Electrophysiological measure of olfactory function. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of olfaction and gustation. New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 229-249.
23. Koskinen S, Vento S, Malmberg H, Tuorlla H. 2004. Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings. Acta Oto-Laryngolog. 124(9):1072-1077.
24. Laing DG. 1983. Natural sniffing gives optimum odour perception for humans. Perception. 12:99-117.
25. Mainland J, Sobel N. 2006. The sniff is part of the olfactory percept. Chem Senses. 31:181-196 [Review].
26. Savic I, Gulyas B, Larsson M, Roland P. 2000. Olfactory functions are mediated by parallel and hierarchical processing. Neuron. 26:735-745.
27. Schoonjans F. 2006. MeclCalc (version 9.0) [Computer Software]. MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium.
28. Warren DW, Walker JC, Drake AF, Lutz RW. 1994. Effects of odorants and irritants on respiratory behavior. Laryngoscope. 104:623-626.
29. Wilkinson L. 1990. SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston (IL): SYSTAT, Inc.
30. Yoshida M. 1984. Correlation analysis of detection threshold data for "standard test" odors. Bull Fac Sci Eng Cho Univ. 27:343-353.