Response to Young and Wolf: Goal attainment in urban ecology research

Urban Ecosystems

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 339-347

  Dooling, Sarah ^a   Graybill, Jessica ^b   Greve, Adrienne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Assistant Professor in the University Libraries   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinary; Reflexive assessment; Transdisciplinary; Urban ecology

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547886804     PISSN: 10838155     EISSN: 15731642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-007-0024-9     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alberti M (1999) Modeling the urban ecosystem: a conceptual framework. Environ & Plann B 26:605-630
2. Alberti M, Waddell P (2000) An integrated urban development and ecological model. Integrated Assessment 1:215-227
3. Alberti M, Marzluff J, Schulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53(12):1169-1179
4. Baun B (2005) Environmental issues: writing a more-than-human urban geography. Prog Hum Geogr 29(5):635-650
5. Berkes K, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
6. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Introduction. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 1-29
7. Clements F (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institute, Washington. Publ. 242:1-512
8. Collins J, Kinzig A, Grimm N, Fagan W, Hope D, Wu J, Borer E (2000) A new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:416-425
9. Cronon W (1991) Nature's metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. Norton, London
10. Cronon W (1996) The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. In: Cronon (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature, pp 69-90
11. Davis M (1998) Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. Metropolitan Books, New York
12. Dooling S, Simon G, Yocom K (2007) Place-based urban ecology: a century of park planning in Seattle. Urban Ecosyst 9:299-321
13. Fanzy I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer D (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biol Conserv 124:63-73
14. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Change 16:253-267
15. Francis T, Whittaker K, Shandas V, Mills A, Graybill J (2005) Incorporating science into the environmental policy process: a case study from Washington state. Ecology and Society 10:35. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art35/
16. Fry G (2001) Multifunctional landscapes-towards transdisciplinary research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:159-168
17. Gandy M (2002) Concrete and clay: reworking nature in New York City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Graybill J, Dooling S, Shandas V, Withey J, Greve A, Simon G (2006) A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: graduate student perspectives. BioScience 56:757-763
19. Grimm N, Grove J, Pickett S, Redman C (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571-584
20. Gunderson L, Holling C (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island, Washington, DC
21. Heg D, Nared M, Blumenfeld T (2004) Innovation in PhD training: the urban ecology IGERT at the University of Washington: mid-term program evaluation. Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education, University of Washington
22. Holling C (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390-405
23. Hough M (1995) Cities and natural processes. Routledge, London
24. Innes J, Booher D (1999) Metropolitan development as a complex system: a new approach to sustainability. Econ Dev Q 13:141-156
25. Kaika M (2005) City of flows: modernity, nature, and the city. Routledge, London
26. Klingle M (2001). Urban by nature: An environmental history of Seattle 1880-1970. PhD dissertation (History), University of Washington, Seattle
27. May R (2004) Editorial-on the role of the humanities in urban ecology: the case of St. Peatersburg. Urban Ecosyst 7:7-15
28. McNeill J (2000) Something new under the sun: an environmental history of the twentieth century world. Norton, London
29. Melosi M (2000) The sanitary city: urban infrastructure in America from colonial times to the present. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
30. Nasauer J (1995) Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc Ecol 10:229-237
31. National Academy of Sciences (2004) Committee on facilitating interdisciplinary research, Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from the World Wide Web at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153. html on 22 August 2005
32. Odum E (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262-270
33. Oleyar D, Greve A, Withey J, Bjorn AM Evaluating urban forest functionality: An interdisciplinary approach. Urban Ecosystems. In review
34. Peterson G (2000) Political ecology and ecological resilience: an integration of human and ecological dynamics. Ecol Econ 35:323-336
35. Peterson G, Allen C, Holling C (1998) Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6-18
36. Pickett S, McDonnell M (1993) Humans as components of ecosystems: a synthesis. In: McDonnell M, Pickett S (eds) Humans as components of ecosystems. Springer, New York
37. Pickett S, Cadenasso M, Grove J (2004) Resilient cities: meanings, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc Urban Plan 69:369-384
38. Pickett S, Cadenasso M, Grove J, Nilon C, Pouyat R, Zipperer W, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127-137
39. Redman C (2005) Resilience theory in archeology. Am Anthropol 107:70-77
40. Redman C, Kinzig A (2003) Resilience of past landscapes: resilience theory, society, and the longue durée. Conservation Ecology 7:14 [online] URL http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art14
41. Robbins P, Sharp J (2003) Producing and consuming chemicals: the moral economy of the American lawn. Econ Geogr 79:425-451
42. Robinson L, Newell J, Marzluff J (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the region: Growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:51-72
43. Scoones I (1999) New ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement? Annu Rev Anthropol 28:479-507
44. Spirn A (1984) The granite garden: urban nature and human design. Basic Books, New York
45. Steiner F (2004) Urban human ecology. Urban Ecosyst 7:179-197
46. Swyngedouw E (1996) The city as hybrid: on nature, society, and cyborg organization. Capital Nat Social 7:65-80
47. Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2004) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 20:479-493
48. von Bertalanffy L (1968) General systems theory. George Brazilier, New York
49. Walker B, Anderies J, Kinzig A, Ryan P (eds) (2006) Exploring resilience in social-ecological systems: comparative studies and theory development. Special Feature of Ecology and Society 11(1):articles 12 to 21
50. Williams R (1973) The country and the city. Oxford University Press, New York
51. Wu J, Loucks O (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439-466
52. Young R, Wolf S (2006) Goal attainment in urban ecology research: a bibliometric review 1975-2004. Urban Ecosyst 9:179-193
53. Zimmerer K (1994) Human geography and the 'new ecology': the prospect and promise of integration. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 84:108-125