The role of general practitioners in continuity of care at the end of life: A qualitative study of terminally ill patients and their next of kin

Palliative Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 409-415

  Michiels, Eva ^a   Deschepper, Reginald ^a   Van Der Kelen, Greta ^a   Bernheim, Jan L ^a   Mortier, Freddy ^b   Vander Stichele, Robert ^c   Deliens, Luc ^a,d  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Continuity of patient care; Palliative care; Primary health care; Terminally ill

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TERMINAL CARE; TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BELGIUM; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FAMILY HEALTH; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; TERMINAL CARE; TERMINALLY ILL;

EID: 34547876531     PISSN: 02692163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269216307078503     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 1573-88.
2. WHO. The Ljubljana Charter on reforming health care. http://www_euro_who_int/AboutWHO/Policy/20010927_5 2006 April 1 [cited 2007 Feb 4]. Available from: URL: http://www.euro.who.int/AboutWHO(Policy/20010927_5.
3. Heyland DK, Dodek P, Rocker G et al. What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ 2006; 174: 627-33.
4. Phillips WR, Haynes DG. The domain of family practice: scope, role, and function. Fam Med 2001; 33: 273-77.
5. Truog RD, Meyer EC, Burns JP. Toward interventions to improve end-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: S373-79.
6. Clarke EB, Curtis JR, Luce JM et al. Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 2255-62.
7. Stewart AL, Teno J, Patrick DL, Lynn J. The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of health care. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999; 17: 93-108.
8. Schers H, van den HH, Bor H, Grol R, van den BW. Familiarity with a GP and patients' evaluations of care. A cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 15-19.
9. Hjortdahl P, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. Br Med J 1992; 304: 1287-90.
10. Cabana MD, Jee SH. Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes? J Fam Pract 2004; 53: 974-80.
11. Mainous AG III, Baker R, Love MM, Gray DP, Gill JM. Continuity of care and trust in one's physician: evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med 2001; 33: 22-27.
12. Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G. Family physician continuity of care and emergency department use in end-of-life cancer care. Med Care 2003; 41: 992-1001.
13. Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G, Cummings I. Primary care continuity and location of death for those with cancer. J Palliat Med 2003; 6: 911-18.
14. Aabom B, Kragstrup J, Vondeling H, Bakketeig LS, Stovring H. Does persistent involvement by the GP improve palliative care at home for end-stage cancer patients? Palliat Med 2006; 20: 507-12.
15. Lorenz K, Lynn J, Morton SC et al. End-of-life care and outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2004; 110: 1-6.
16. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. Br Med J 2003; 327: 1219-21.
17. Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med 2003; 1: 134-43.
18. Sturmberg J. Continuity of care: towards a definition based on experiences of practising GPs. Fam Pract 2000; 17: 16-20.
19. Freeman G, Shepperd S. Continuity of care: report of a scoping exercise. 2001. http://www.sdo.Ishtm.ac.uk/files/project/2-exec-summary.pdf [cited 2007 Feb 4].
20. Borgsteede SD, Graafland-Riedstra C, Deliens L, Francke AL, van Eijk JT, Willems DL. Good end-of-life care according to patients and their GPs. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 20-26.
21. Bulsara C, Ward AM, Joske D. Patient perceptions of the GP role in cancer management. Aust Fam Physician 2005; 34: 299-300, 302.
22. Norman A, Sisler J, Hack T, Harlos M. Family physicians and cancer care. Palliative care patients' perspectives. Can Fam Physician 2001; 47: 2009-2006.
23. Deschepper R, VanderStichele R, Bernheim JL et al. Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 14-19.
24. Deschepper R, Vander Stichele RH, Mortier F, Deliens L. Carefully dying at home: a guideline for general practitioners] (in Dutch). Academia Press, 2003: 159-174.
25. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, 1998: 61-74.
26. Miles BM, Huberman AM. Qualitative analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edition. Sage, 2000: 18-22.
27. Wall EM. Continuity of care and family medicine: definition, determinants, and relationship to outcome. J Fam Pract 1981; 13: 655-64.
28. Schers H. Continuity of care in general practice. Exploring the balance between personal and informational continuity [dissertation]. Raboud Universiteit, 2004: 47-58.
29. Higginson IJ, Sen-Gupta GJ. Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med 2000; 3: 287-300.
30. Linden M, Gothe H, Ormel J. Pathways to care and psychological problems of general practice patients in a "gate keeper" and an "open access" health care system: a comparison of Germany and the Netherlands. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003; 38: 690-97.
31. O'Connor M, Lee-Steere R. General practitioners' attitudes to palliative care: A Western Australian rural perspective. J Palliat Med 2006; 9: 1271-81.
32. Nutting PA, Goodwin MA, Flocke SA, Zyzanski SJ, Stange KC. Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when? Ann Fam Med 2003; 1: 149-55.
33. Charlton RC. Attitudes towards care of the dying: a questionnaire survey of general practice attenders. Fam Pract 1991; 8: 356-59.
34. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med 2005; 80: 1094-99.
35. Higginson I, Gysels M. Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer. Research Evidence Manual, 2004. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/csgspresearchevidence.pdf [cited 2007 Feb 2].
36. Stokes T, Tarrant C, Mainous AG III, Schers H, Freeman G, Baker R. Continuity of care: is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and The Netherlands. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 353-59.
37. Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: general practitioners' knowledge about, and sense of responsibility toward their patients. Fam Pract 1992; 9: 3-8.
38. Hjortdahl P. Ideology and reality of continuity of care. Fam Med 1990; 22: 361-64.
39. Allen I. Women doctors and their careers: what now? Br Med J 2005; 331: 569-72.
40. Bayingana K, Demarest S, Gisle L et al. Gezondheidsenquête in België door Interview. http://www_iph_fgovbe/epidemio/EPINL/ index4htm 2004 [cited 2007 Feb 5].