Barriers to the use of e-health technology in nurse practitioner-patient consultations

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 103-109

  Adams, Ann E ^a   Adams, Rachel ^a   Thorogood, Margaret ^a   Buckingham, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electronic information; Information resources; Nurse practitioners

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONSULTATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING PRACTICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 34547871630     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v15i2.648     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Department of Health. Making a Difference: strengthening the nursing, midwifery and health visiting contribution to health and healthcare. London: HMSO, 1999.
2. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: HMSO, 2000.
3. Department of Health. Shifting the Balance of Power within the NHS: securing delivery. London: HMSO, 2001.
4. Department of Health. Liberating the Talents: helping primary care trusts and nurses to deliver the NHS Plan. London: HMSO, 2002.
5. Department of Health. Choosing Health: making healthier choices easier. London: HMSO, 2004.
6. Department of Health. The Expert Patient. a new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century. London: HMSO, 2001.
7. Bend J. Public Value and E-Health. 2004. www.ippr.org.uk/ uploadedFiles/projects/Bend_PublicValueandeHealth-ippr.pdf
8. Darbyshire P. 'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2004; 13:17-25.
9. Royal College of Nursing. Nurses and NHS IT Developments: online survey by Nursix.com. London: Royal College of Nursing, 2004.
10. Royal College of Nursing. Report of Key Findings of RCN's Survey of the Information Needs of Nurses, Health Care Assistants, Midwives and Health Visitors. London: Royal College of Nursing, 2005.
11. NHS Executive. Delivering Twen ty-First- Century IT Support to the NHS. Leeds: Department of Health, 2002.
12. Community Practitioners and Health Visitors Association. Health Visitors Use Own Computers and Mobiles to Subsidise NHS: CPHVA survey. Press Release, 19 May 2003.
13. Hoban V. Nursing in the electronic age. Nursing Times 2004;100:19-22.
14. British Computer Society. The Challenges of Complex IT Projects: the report of a working group from the Royal Academy of Engineering and the British Computer Society. 2004. www.bcs.org/BCS/News/ PositionsAndResponses/Positions/complexity.htm
15. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJC, Southon G and Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organisational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1997; 4:79-93.
16. Rayner P. Programme and Projects: what is the difference? Paper presented at EPMF5 (Engineering Project Management Forum), London; 2004.
17. Simpson RL. Managing the three 'p's to improve patient safety: nursing administration's role in managing information technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004;73:559-61.
18. Shackel B. Ergonomics: scope, contribution and future possibilities. The Psychologist 1996;9:304-8.
19. Lee KS. Building intergroup relations after September 11. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2002;2:131-41.
20. Thompson C, McCaughan D, Cullum N, Sheldon T, Thompson D and Mulhall A. Nurses' Use of Research Information in Clinical Decision Making. a descriptive and analytic study. Report presented to the NHS R&D Programme in evaluating methods to promote the implementation of R&D. University of York, 2000.
21. Lee T-T, Lee T-Y, Lin K-C and Chang PC. Factors affecting the use of nursing information systems in Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005;50:170-8.
22. Green E and Adam A. Online leisure: gender and ICTs in the home. Information, Communication and Society 1998;1:291-312.
23. Jayasuriya R and Caputi P. Computer attitude and computer anxiety in nursing. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 1996;14:340-51.
24. Knowles E, O'Cathain A, Morrell L Munro JF and Nicholl JP. NHS Direct and nurses: opportunity or monotony? International Journal of Nursing Studies 2002;39:857-66.
25. Sinclair M and Gardner J. Planning for information technology key skills in nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999;30:1441-50.
26. Ammenwerth E and Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10: 69-84.
27. Bodenheimer T and Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? Journal of the American Medical Association 2003;290:259-64.
28. Friedman CP, Ozbolt JG and Masys DR. Towards a new culture for biomedical informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2001;8:519-26.
29. Bates D and Gawande A. Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine 2003;348:2526-34.
30. Baxter GD, Monk AF, Tan K, Dear PRF and Newell SJ. Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate the integration of decision support systems into the neonatal intensive care unit. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2005;35:243-57.
31. Liaw ST and Schattner P. Electronic decision support in general practice: what's the hold up? Australian Family Physician 2003;32:941-4.
32. Pagliari C and Gregor P. EH1 E-health Scoping Exercise: review of the traditional research literature. 2004. www.sdo.Ishtm.ac.uk/ e-health.htm
33. Fox J and Thomson R. Clinical Decision Support Systems: a discussion of quality, safety and legal liability issues. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium 2002, San Antonio. Philadelphia PA: Hanley & Belfus, 2002: 265-9.
34. van de Castle B, Kim J, Pedreira MLG, Paiva A, Goossen W and Bates DW. Information technology and patient safety in nursing practice: an international perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004;73: 607-14.
35. Miles MB and Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. (2e). London: Sage, 1994.