Population preferences and choice of primary care models: A discrete choice experiment in Sweden

Health Policy

Volumn 83, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 314-322

  Hjelmgren, Jonas ^a   Anell, Anders ^a  

^a SWEDISH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Discrete choice; Population preferences; Primary care organisation; Sweden

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY CARE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SWEDEN;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SWEDEN;

EID: 34547857450     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lamarche P.A., Beaulieu M., Pineault R., et al. Choices for change: the path for restructuring Primary Healthcare Services in Canada (2003), Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
2. In: Saltman R.B., Rico A., and Boerma W.G.W. (Eds). Primary care in the driveŕs seat? Organisational reform in European primary care (2006), Open University Press, Berkshire
3. Anell A. Swedish Health Care under pressure. Health Econ 14 S1 (2005) S237-S254
4. Anell A. Primärvård i förändring. Studentlitteratur: Lund; 2005.
5. Cattin P., and Wittink D. Commercial use of con-joint analysis: a survey. J Marketing 46 (1982) 44-53
6. Kroes E.P., and Sheldon R. Stated preference methods: an introduction. J Transport Econ Policy 22 (1988) 11-26
7. Hensher D.A., Barnard P.O., and Truong T.P. The role of states preference methods in studies of travel choice. J Transport Econ Policy 22 (1988) 45-58
8. Opaluch J., Swallow S., Weaver T., et al. Evaluation impacts from noxious facilities: including public preferences in current siting mechanisms. J Environ Manage 24 (1993) 41-59
9. Adamowicz W., Louviere J., and Williams M. Combining revealed preference and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J Environ Manage 6 (1994) 271-292
10. Ryan M., and Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 1 (2003) 1-10
11. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74 (1966) 132-157
12. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theor Decis 8 (1977) 229-254
13. Train K.E. Discrete choice methods with simulation. (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York
14. Louvier J.J., Hensher D.A., and Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York
15. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., and Green W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York
16. Dillman D.A. Mail and telephone surveys. The Total Design Method (1978), Wiley, New York
17. Anell A., Rosén P., and Hjortsberg C. Choice and participation in the health services: a survey of preferences among Swedish residents. Health Policy 40 (1997) 157-168
18. Vick S., and Scott A. Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. J Health Econ 17 (1998) 587-605
19. Scott A. Economics of general practice. In: Culyer A.J., and Newhouse J.P. (Eds). Handbook of Health Economics vol. 1 (2000), Elsevier Science
20. Rosén P., Anell A., and Hjortsberg C. Patient views on choice and participation in primary health care. Health Policy 55 (2001) 121-128
21. The experimental plan was based on "A Catalogue and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments" by GJ Hahn and Shapiro SS, Report 66-C-165. May 1966. General Electric Research and Development Centre, Schenectady, New York.
22. Rosen P, Anell A, Hjortsberg C, et al. Patientpreferenser i primärvården-en empirisk undersökning kring patientinflytande. IHE Working Report 1998:3. Lund, 1998.
23. Bryan S., and Dolan P. Discrete choice experiments in health economics-for better or for worse?. Eur J Health Econom 5 (2004) 199-202
24. Ryan M., and Skatun D. Modelling non-demanders in choice experiments. Health Econ 13 (2004) 397-402