Targeted aiming movements are compromised in nonaffected limb of persons with stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 388-397

  Ketcham, Caroline J ^a   Rodriguez, Tiffany M ^a   Zihlman, Kirk A ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemispheric control; Kinematics; Organization; Planning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LIMB; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34547851762     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306297872     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Haaland K., Harrington D. The role of hemispheres in closed loop movements. Brain Cogn. 1989 ; 9: 158-180.
2. Haaland K., Harrington D. Hemispheric asymmetry of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996 ; 6: 796-800.
3. Pohl P., Winstein C., Onla-or S. Sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1997 ; 9: 57-69.
4. Desrosiers J., Bourbonnais D., Bravo G., et al. Performance of the unaffected upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke. 1996 ; 27: 1564-1570.
5. Haaland K., Delaney H. Motor deficits after left or right hemisphere damage due to stroke or tumor. Neuropsychologia. 1981 ; 19: 17-27.
6. Yelnick A., Bonan I., Debray M., et al. Changes in the execution of a complex manual task after ipsilateral ischemic cerebral hemisphere stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 ; 77: 806-810.
7. Sunderland A., Bowers M., Sluman S., et al. Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and the relationship to cognitive deficit. Stroke. 1999 ; 30: 949-955.
8. Hermsdorfer J., Laimgruber K., Kerkhoff G., et al. effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1999 ; 128: 41-51.
9. Hermsdofer J., Ulrich S., Marquardt C., et al. Prehension with the ipsilesional hand after unilateral brain damage. Cortex. 1999 ; 35: 139-162.
10. Haaland K., Harrington D., Yeo R. The effects of task complexity on motor performance in left and right CVA patients. Neuropsychologia. 1987 ; 5: 783-794.
11. Haaland KY, Harrington DL Limb-sequencing after left but not right hemisphere damage. Brain Cogn. 1994 ; 24: 104-122.
12. Winstein C., Pohl P. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res. 1995 ; 105: 163-174.
13. Fisk J., Goodale M. The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Exp Brain Res. 1988 ; 72: 425-435.
14. Wyke M. Effects of brain lesion on the rapidity of arm movement. Neurology. 1967 ; 17: 1113-1120.
15. Adam J. The effects of objectives and constraints on motor control strategy in reciprocal aiming movements. J Mot Behav. 1992 ; 24 (2). 173-185.
16. Bohan M., Longstaff M., Van Gemmert A., et al. Differential effects of target height and width on 2D aiming movement duration and kinematics. Motor Control. 2003 ; 7: 278-289.
17. Buchanan J., Park J., Ryu Y., et al. Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task. Exp Brain Res. 2003 ; 150: 473-489.
18. Fitts PM The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol. 1954 ; 47: 381-391.
19. Ketcham C., Seidler R., Van Gemmert A, et al. Age related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 ; 57B: 54-64.
20. Helsen W., Adam J., Elliot D., et al. One target advantage: a test of the movement integration hypothesis. Hum Move Sci. 2001 ; 20: 643-674.
21. Leis B., Rand M., Van Gemmert A., et al. Movement precues in planning and execution of aiming movements in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 2005 ; 194: 393-409.
22. Rand M., Alberts J., Stelmach G., et al. The influence of movement segment difficulty on movements with two-stroke sequence. Exp Brain Res. 1997 ; 115 (1). 137-146.
23. Rand M., Stelmach G. Effects of increased stroke number on sequential arm movements in Parkinson's disease subjects. Parkinson Rel Disord. 1999 ; 5: 27-35.
24. Rand M., Stelmach G. Segment interdependency and difficulty in two-stroke sequences. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 134: 228-236.
25. Dounskaia N., Ketcham C., Stelmach G. Commonalities and differences in control of a large set of drawing movements. Exp Brain Res. 2002 ; 146: 11-25.
26. Dounskaia N., Ketcham C., Stelmach G. Influence of biomechanical constraints on horizontal arm movements. Motor Control. 2002 ; 6: 366-387.
27. Galloway J., Koshland G. General coordination of shoulder, elbow and wrist dynamics during multijoint arm movements. Exp Brain Res. 2002 ; 142: 163-180.
28. Ketcham C., Dounskaia N., Stelmach G. Multijoint movement control: the importance of interactive torques. Prog Brain Res. 2004 ; 143: 207-218.
29. Chen R., Gerloff C., Hallet M., et al. Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities. Ann Neurol. 1997 ; 41: 247-254.
30. Velicki M., Winstein C., Pohl P. Impaired direction and extent specification of aimed arm movements in humans with stroke-related brain damage. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 130: 362-374.
31. Fisher B., Winstein C., Velicki M. Deficits in compensatory trajectory adjustments after unilateral sensorimotor stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 132: 328-344.
32. Goodale M., Milner A., Jackson L., et al. Kinematic analysis of limb movements in neuropsychological research: subtle deficits and recovery of function. Can J Psychol. 1990 ; 44: 180-195.
33. Carlton L. Movement control characteristics of aiming responses. Ergonomics. 1980 ; 23: 1019-1032.
34. Guiard Y. On Fitts' and Hooke's laws: simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychol. 1993 ; 82: 139-159.
35. Meyer D., Abrams R., Kornblum S., et al. Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev. 1988 ; 95: 340-370.
36. Bootsma R., Boulard M., Fernandez L., et al. Informational constraints in human precision aiming. Neurosci Lett. 2002 ; 333: 141-145.
37. Buchanan J., Park J., Shea C. Systematic scaling of target width: dynamics, planning, and feedback. Neurosci Lett. 2004 ; 367: 317-322.
38. Mottet D., Guiard Y., Ferrand T., et al. Two-handed performance of a rhythmical Fitts task by individuals and dyads. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 ; 27 (6). 1275-1286.
39. Folstein M., Folstein S., McHugh P. " Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 ; 12 (3). 189-198.
40. Webster D. Critical analysis of the disability in Parkinson's disease. Modern Treatment. 1968 ; 5: 257-282.
41. Winstein C., Grafton S., Pohl P. Motor task difficulty and brain activity: investigation of goal directed reciprocal aiming using positron emission tomography. J Neurophysiol. 1997 ; 77: 1581-1594.
42. Harris JE, Eng JJ Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20: 380-389.
43. Wagner J., Lang C., Sahrmann S., et al. Relationships between sensorimotor impairments and reaching deficits in acute hemipareis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 ; 20: 406-416.