Towards a more social Social Psychology: The case of meta-stereotypes;Hacia una Psicología Social más “social”: El caso de los meta-estereotipos

Revista de Psicologia Social

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 287-291

  Otten, Sabine ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Estereotipos; Intergroup relations; Meta estereotipos; Meta stereotypes; Perspectiva; Perspectivity; Relaciones intergrupales; Stereotypes

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547847991     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/02134740260373008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ALLPORT, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
2. BARGH, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
3. BROWN, R. J. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4. CROCKER, J., MAJOR, B. & STEELE, (1998). Social stigma. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert. & Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 504-553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. FISKE, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. En D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. GOMEZ, A. & BARRETO, M. (2001). Reactions to Social Hypocrisy: Effects of Meta-stereotype Information and Social Fairness on Outgroup Evaluation. Paper presented at the 4thJena Workshop on Intergroup Processes, Jena.
7. GOMEZ, A. & HUICI, C. (Submitted for publication). When contact with them improves our image: Effects of positive social comparhons and meta-stereotypes on intergroup relations. Madrid: UNED.
8. GOMEZ, A., RODRIGUEZ-BAILON, R., HUICI, C., MOYA, M. & JETTEN, J. (Submitted for publication). Knowing the others perspective: the relevance of meta-stereotype and values to modify outgroup evaluation.
9. GRAUMANN, C. F. (1979). Die Scheu des Psychologen vor der Interaktion [Psychologists’ hesitance to deal with interaction]. Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie, 10, 284-204.
10. GUINOTE, A., JUDD, C. M. & BRAUER, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality ami Social Psychology, 82, 708-721.
11. HOGG, M. A. & VAUGHAN, G. M. (2002). Social Psychology (3rd Edition). London: Prentice Hall.
12. KLEIN, O. & AZZI, A. (2001). The strategic confirmation of meta-stereotypes: How group members attempt to tailor an outgroup’s representation of themselves. BritishJournal of Social Psychology, 40, 279-293.
13. LIVINGSTON, R. W. (2002). The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African-Americans’ implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 404-413.
14. MACKIE, D. M. & SMITH, E. (2002). Intergroup emotions and the social self: Prejudice recobceptualized as differentiated reactions to outgroups. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self. Cognitive, interpersonal andperspectives (pp. 309-326). New York: Psychology Press.
15. MAJOR, B., QUINTON, W. J., MCCOY, S. K. & SCHMADER, T. (2001). Reducing prejudice: The target’s perspective. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 211-237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. MUMMENDEY, A., LINNEWEBER, V. & LOSCHPER, G. (1984a). Aggression: From act to interaction. In A. Mummendey (Ed.), Social Psychology of aggression. From individual behavior to social interaction (pp. 69-126). New York: Springer.
17. MUMMENDEY, a., LINNEWEBER, V. & LOSCHPER, G. (1984b). Actor or victim of aggression: Divergent perspectives - divergent evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 297-311.
18. MUMMENDEY, A. & OTTEN, S. (1989). Perspective-specific differences in the segmentation and evaluation of aggressive interaction sequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 23-40.
19. MUMMENDEY, A. & OTTEN, S. (1993). Aggression: Interaction Between Individuals and Social Groups. In R. B. Felson & J. T. Tedeschi (Eds.), Aggression and Violence. SocialInteractionist Perspective (pp. 145-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. MUMMENDEY, A. & OTTEN, S. (2001). Aversive discrimination. In R. Brown. & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook on Social Psychology. Vol. 4: Intergroup Processes (pp. 112-132). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
21. MUMMENDEY, A. & WENZEL, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
22. OTTEN, S. & MUMMENDEY, A. (1999). Aggressive Interaktionen und soziale Diskriminierung. Zur Rolle perspektiven- und kon- textspezifischer Legitimationsprozesse [Aggressive interactions and social discrimination: On the impact of perspective-specific and context-specific processes of legitimization]. Zeitschriftfur, 126-138.
23. PETTIGREW, T. F. & MEERTENS, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
24. STEELE, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual ability and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
25. STEELE, C. M. & ARONSON, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 5, 797-811.
26. STROEBE, W. (1979). The level of social-psychological analysis. A plea for a more social Social Psychology. In L. H. Stricklund (Ed.), Soviet and Western perspectives in Social Psychology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
27. TAYLOR, D. M. & BROWN, R. J. (1979). Towards a more social social psychology? BrithishJournal of Social & ClinicalPsychology, 18 (2), 173-180.
28. TAJFEL, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In: J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.). The content of social psychology. London: Academic Press.
29. VORAUER, J. D., MAIN, K. J., & O’CONNELL, G. B., (1998). How Do Individuals Expect to Be Viewed by Members of Lower Status Groups? Content and Implications of Meta-Stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 4, 917-937.