A partition experimental design for a sequential process with a large number of variables

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 555-564

  Perry, Leonard A ^a   Montgomery, Douglas C ^b   Fowler, John W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Case study; Partition experimental designs; Sequential processes

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

INVESTIGATE MULTIPLE PROCESSES; MULTIPLE FACTORS; PARTITION DESIGN; SEQUENTIAL PROCESS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 34547841596     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.832     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Coleman DE, Montgomery DC. Systematic approach to planning for a designed industrial experiment. Technometrics 1993; 35:1-27.
2. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments (6th edn). Wiley: New York, 2005.
3. Box GEP, Draper NR. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. Wiley: New York, 1987.
4. Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimal conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1951;13:1-45.
5. Hartley HO. Smallest composite design for quadratic response surfaces. Biometrics 1959; 15:611-624.
6. Roquemore KG. Hybrid designs for quadratic response surfaces. Technometrics 1976; 18:419-423.
7. Perry LA, Montgomery DC, Fowler JW. Partition experimental designs for sequential processes: Part I - first order models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2001; 17(6):429-438.
8. Perry LA, Montgomery DC, Fowler JW. Partition experimental designs for sequential processes: Part II - second order models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2002; 18(5):373-382.