Partition experimental designs for sequential processes: Part II - Second-order models

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 373-382

  Perry, Leonard A ^a   Montgomery, Douglas C ^b   Fowler, John W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Partition designs; Second order designs; Sequential processes

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; POLYNOMIALS; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

PARTITION DESIGNS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 0036751516     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.488     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Perry L.A. Montgomery D.C., Fowler J.W. Partition experimental designs for sequential processes: Part I-First order models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2001; 18(1).
2. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response surface Methodology. Wiley: New York 1995.
3. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. Wiley: New York, 1987.
4. Khuri A.I., Cornell J.A. Response Surfaces: Design and Analyses (2nd edn). Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996.
5. Box G.E.P., Hunter J.S. Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. Annals of Mathematics and Statistics 1957; 28:195-241.
6. Khuri A.I. A measure of rotatability for response surface designs. Technometrics 1988; 30:95-104.
7. Draper N.R., Guttman I. A measure of rotability for response surface designs. Technometrics 1988; 30:105-111.
8. Draper N.R., Pukelsheim F. Another look at rotatability. Technometrics 1990; 32:195-202.
9. Lucas J.M. Which response surface design is best. Technometrics 1976; 18:411-417.
10. St John R.C., Draper N.R. D-optimality for regression designs. Technometrics 1975; 17:15-23.
11. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R. Robust designs. Biometrika 1975; 62:347-352.
12. Pukelsheim F. Optimum Design of Experiments. Chapman and Hall: New York, 1995.
13. Crosier R.B. Some new two-level saturated designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2000; 32:103-110.
14. Box G.E.P., Wilson K.B. On the experimental attainment of optimal conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1951; 13:1-45.
15. Hartley H.O. Smallest composite design for quadratic response surfaces. Biometrics 1959; 15:611-624.
16. Roquemore K.G. Hybrid designs for quadratic response surfaces. Technometrics 1976; 18:419-423.
17. Lucas J.M. Optimum composite designs. Technometrics 1974; 16:561-567.
18. Draper N.R. Center points in second-order response surface designs. Technometrics 1982; 24:173-180.
19. Montgomery D.C, Peck E.A., Vining G.G. Introduction to linear regression analysis (3rd edn). Wiley: New York, 2001.