Magnetic resonance imaging of SILCS diaphragm: anatomical considerations and corroboration with clinical fit

Contraception

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 238-244

  Yang, Claire C ^a   Maravilla, Kenneth R ^a   Kilbourne Brook, Maggie ^b   Austin, Glenn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Program for Appropriate Technology in Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Diaphragm; Female contraception; Female reproductive tract; MR pelvis; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BARRIER CONTRACEPTION; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FEMALE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MULTIPARA; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NULLIPARA; PARITY; PILOT STUDY; PREMENOPAUSE; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SILCS DIAPHRAGM; SIMULATION; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; BODY MASS INDEX; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; GENITALIA, FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARITY; PILOT PROJECTS; PREGNANCY; PUBIC SYMPHYSIS;

EID: 34547841559     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.05.090     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Grossman D., Ellertson C., Abuabara K., Blanchard K., and Rivas F.T. Barriers to contraceptive use in product labeling and practice guidelines. Am J Public Health 96 (2006) 791-799
2. Mauck C., Lai J.J., Schwartz J., and Weiner D.H. Diaphragms in clinical trials: is clinician fitting necessary?. Contraception 69 (2004) 263-266
3. Schwartz J.L., Mauck C.K., Rountree R.W., et al. SILCS diaphragm: postcoital testing of a new, single size contraceptive diaphragm. Obstet Gynecol 107 4 Suppl. (2006) 12S
4. Hall G.H., Guthrie K.A., and Turnbull L.W. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the Mirena and GyneFix intra-uterine contraceptive devices: a report of two cases. Br J Fam Plann 26 (2000) 224-226
5. Barnhart K.T., Timbers K., Pretorius E.S., Lin K., and Shaunik A. In vivo assessment of NuvaRing placement. Contraception 72 (2005) 196-199
6. Maldjian C., Pelosi II M.A., Pelosi III M.A., and Adam R. Evaluation of a contraceptive device with MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 19 (2001) 629-633
7. Pretorius E.S., Barnhart K., Timbers K., and Mauck C. Use of MRI to determine the in vivo position of a silicone vaginal barrier contraceptive device. Contraception 65 (2002) 343-346
8. Maravilla K.R., Cao Y., Heiman J.R., et al. Noncontrast dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of female sexual arousal. J Urol 173 (2005) 162-166
9. Hricak H., Gatsonis C., Chi D.S., et al. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 9329-9337
10. Gousse A.E., Barbaric Z.L., Safir M.H., Madjar S., Marumoto A.K., and Raz S. Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis. J Urol 164 (2000) 1606-1613
11. Suh D.D., Yang C.C., Cao Y., Heiman J.R., Garland P.A., and Maravilla K.R. MRI of female genital and pelvic organs during sexual arousal. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 25 (2004) 153-162
12. Pretorius E.S., Timbers K., Malamud D., and Barnhart K. Magnetic resonance imaging to determine the distribution of a vaginal gel: before, during, and after both simulated and real intercourse. Contraception 66 (2002) 443-451