Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the Mirena and GyneFix intra-uterine contraceptive devices: A report of two cases

British Journal of Family Planning

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 224-226

  Hall, G H ^a   Guthrie, K A ^a   Turnbull, L W ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

GyneFix; Intra uterine contraceptive; Intra uterine system; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mirena; MRI

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; LEVONORGESTREL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTRACEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MENORRHAGIA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY CYST; PELVIS PAIN SYNDROME;

EID: 0347898863     PISSN: 01448625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1783/147118900101194634     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Medical management of dysfunctional uterine bleeding
2. Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia
3. Open randomised study of the use of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy
4. Lack of interaction between magnetic resonance imaging and the Copper-T380A IUD
5. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: MR imaging
6. The use of transvaginal ultrasonography compared to routine gynecological examination to check the location of an intrauterine contraceptive device
7. Partial perforation of the bladder by multiload
8. Retrieval of lost Copper-T from the rectum