Different mechanistic requirements for prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins: A lattice study

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 13, 2007, Pages

  Jacob, Etai ^a   Horovitz, Amnon ^b   Unger, Ron ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN;

ALLOSTERISM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECRETION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 34547830871     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm180     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Abkevich, V.I., Gutin, A.M., Shakhnovich, E.I. (1995) Impact of local and non-local interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. J Mol Biol., 252, 460-471.
2. Anfinsen, C.B. (1973) Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science, 181, 223-230.
3. Baumketner, A. et al. (2003) Effects of confinement in chaperonin assisted protein folding: Rate enhancement by decreasing the roughness of the folding energy landscape. J. Mol. Biol., 332, 701-713.
4. Betancourt, M.R. and Thirumalai, D. (1999) Exploring the kinetic requirements for enhancement of protein folding rates in the GroEL cavity. J. Mol. Biol., 287, 627-644.
5. Braig, K. et al. (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature, 371, 578-586.
6. Bryngelson, J.D. and Wolynes, P.G. (1987) Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 7524-7528.
7. Chan, H.S. and Dill, K.A. (1996) A simple model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proteins, 24, 345-351.
8. Danziger, O. et al. (2003) Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155→Ala. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 13797-13802.
9. Dill, K.A. et al. (1995) Principles of protein folding - a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci., 4, 561-602.
10. Gutin, A.M. et al. (1995) Is burst hydrophobic collapse necessary for protein folding? Biochemistry, 34, 3066-3076.
11. Horovitz, A. and Willison, K.R. (2005) Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 15, 646-651.
12. Jacob, E. and Unger, R. (2007) A tale of two tails: Why are terminal residues of proteins exposed? Bioinformatics, 23, e225-e230.
13. Kerner, M.J. et al. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell, 122, 209-220.
14. Kipnis, Y. et al. (2007) Concerted ATP-induced allosteric transitions in GroEL facilitate release of protein substrate domains in an all-or-none manner. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 3119-3124.
15. Liou, A.K.F. and Willison, K.R. (1997) Elucidation of the subunit orientation in CCT (chaperonin containing TCPI) from the subunit composition of CCT micro-complexes. EMBO J., 16, 4311-4316.
16. Ma, J. et al. (2000) A dynamic model for the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol., 302, 303-313.
17. Metropolis, N. et al. (1953) Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087-1092.
18. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. (1993) A new substitution matrix for protein sequence searches based on contact frequencies in protein structures. Protein Eng., 6, 267-278.
19. Ranson, N.A. et al. (2001) ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell, 107, 869-879.
20. Rivenzon-Segal, D. et al. (2005) Sequential ATP-induced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12, 233-237.
21. Sali, A. et al. (1994) How does a protein fold? Nature, 369, 248-251.
22. Skolnick, J. and Kolinski, A. (1991) Dynamic Monte Carlo simulations of a new lattice model of globular protein folding, structure and dynamics. J. Mol. Biol., 221, 499-531.
23. Todd, M.J. et al. (1996) Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U S A, 93, 4030-4035.
24. Unger, R. and Moult, J. (1993) Genetic algorithms for protein folding simulations. J. Mol. Biol., 231, 75-81.
25. Unger, R. and Moult, J. (1996) Local interactions dominate folding in a simple protein model. J. Mol. Biol., 259, 988-994.
26. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature, 388, 741-750.
27. Yifrach, O. and Horovitz, A. (1995) Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry, 34 5303-5308.
28. Yifrach, O. and Horovitz, A. (1998) Mapping the transition state of the allosteric pathway of GroEL by protein engineering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 13262-13263.