Design for adaptability (DFAD)-a new concept for achieving sustainable design

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 727-734

  Kasarda, Mary E ^a   Terpenny, Janis P ^a,b   Inman, Dan ^a   Precoda, Karl R ^a   Jelesko, John ^a   Sahin, Asli ^b   Park, Jaeil ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b State University   (United States)

^c Ajou University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Design for adaptability; Dynamic systems; Engineering design; Sustainable design

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DESIGN FOR ADAPTABILITY; ENGINEERING DESIGN; SUSTAINABLE DESIGN;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 34547821854     PISSN: 07365845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Emblemsvag J, Bras B. Activity-based costing in design for product retirement. In: American society of mechanical engineers, design engineering division (Publication). New York NY, USA: ASME; 1994.
2. Johnson H.D. Green Plans, Greenprint for Sustainability (1995), University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE
3. Seo K.K., et al. Approximate estimation of the product life cycle cost using artificial neural networks in conceptual design. Int J Adv Manu Technol 19 6 (2002) 461-471
4. Tipnis V.A. Challenges in product strategy, product planning and technology development for product life cycle design. CIRP Annuals 43 1 (1994) 157-162
5. Antonios C, Inman DJ, Samali A. Experimental and theoretical behavior of self-healing bolted joints. J Intell Mater Syst Struct, in press.
6. Peairs D.M., Park G., and Inman D.J. Practical issues of activating self-repairing bolted joints. Smart Mater Struct 13 6 (2004) 1414-1423
7. Hmelo CE, et al. Problem-based course in sustainable technology. Proceedings of frontiers in education conference, Piscataway, NJ, USA; 1995.
8. Emblemsvag J., and Bras B. Integrated economic and environmental assessments through activity-based life-cycle assessments. IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment (1999), IEEE, Danvers, MA, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA
9. Henstock M.E. Design for recyclability (1988), The Institute of Metals, London
10. Sutherland J., et al. A global perspective on the environmental challenges facing the automotive industry: state-of-the-art and directions for the future. Int J Vehicle Des 35 1-2 (2004) 86-110
11. Carlier T., et al. Environmental benchmarking of medium-sized TVs sold in North America, Europe and Asia (China). IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment (2003), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Boston, MA, United States
12. Otto K., and Wood K. Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development (2001), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
13. Rajan P.K.P., et al. An empirical foundation for product flexibility. Des Stud 26 4 (2005) 405-438
14. Amezquita T, et al. Characterizing the remanufacturability of engineering systems. In: American society of mechanical engineers, design engineering division (Publication) DE, Boston, MA, USA; 1995.
15. Bras B., and McIntosh M.W. Product, process, and organizational design for remanufacture-an overview of research. Robot Comput-integrated Manuf 15 1 (1999) 167-178
16. Reap J, Bras B. Design for disassembly and the value of robotic semi-destructive disassembly. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Montreal, Que., Canada. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2002.
17. Shu L.H., and Flowers W.C. Application of a design-for-remanufacture framework to the selection of product life-cycle fastening and joining methods. Robot Comput-integrated Manuf 15 1 (1999) 179-190
18. Shu LH, Flowers WC. Structured approach to design for remanufacture. In: American society of mechanical engineers, design engineering division (Publication) DE, New Orleans, LA, USA. New York, NY, USA: ASME; 1993.
19. Shu L.H., and Flowers W.C. Considering remanufacture and other end-of-life options in selection of fastening and joining methods. IEEE international symposium on electronics & the environment (1995), IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA. Piscataway, NJ, USA
20. Sundin E., and Bras B. Making functional sales environmentally and economically beneficial through product remanufacturing. J Cleaner Prod 13 9 (2005) 913-925
21. Clausing D., and Frey D.D. Improving system reliability by failure-mode avoidance including four concept design strategies. Syst Eng 8 3 (2005) 245-261
22. Lu Y, et al. Reliability-focused parts selection in derivative product-development- processes. IEEE international engineering management conference, Singapore. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2004.
23. Shu L.H., and Flowers W.C. Reliability modeling in design for remanufacture. J Mech Des 120 4 (1998) 620-627
24. Rajan PK, et al. Empirical study on project flexibility. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference and comput. and Inf. in Eng. Conference, vol. 3, 2004. p. 109-24.
25. Carone MJ, et al. An application of nonstructural theory ion the multi-objective design of product platforms. Proceeding of the ASME design engineering technical conference, vol. 3; 2003.
26. Hernandez G., Allen J.K., and Mistree F. Platform design for customizable products as a problem of access in a geometric space. Eng Optim 35 3 (2003) 229-254
27. Lipson H, Pollack JB, Suh NP. Promoting modularity in evolutionary design. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 2001.
28. Newcomb P.J., Bras B., and Rosen D.W. Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. J Mech Des 120 3 (1998) 483-491
29. Panchal JH, et al. Designing design processes in product lifecycle management: Research issues and strategies. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2004.
30. Seepersad CC, Mistree F, Allen JK. A quantitative approach for designing multiple product platforms for an evolving portfolio of products. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Montreal, Que., Canada; 2002.
31. Simpson T.W., and Mistree F. A concept exploration method for product platform and product family design. Optim Ind 2 (1999) 371-386
32. Simpson T.W., Seepersad C.C., and Mistree F. Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family. Concurrent Eng Res Appl 9 3 (2001) 177-190
33. Williams CB, et al. Designing platforms for customizable products in markets with non-uniform demand. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2004.
34. Josias C., Terpenny J.P., and McLean K.J. Component obsolescence risk assessment (2004), Institute of Industrial Engineers, Houston, TX, USA. Norcross, GA, USA
35. Suh N.P. On functional periodicity as the basis for long-term stability of engineered and natural systems and its relationship to physical laws. Res Eng Des 15 1 (2004) 72-75
36. Doyle J.C., Francis A.B., and Tannenbaum A.R. Feedback control theory (1992), Macmillan Publishing Co., New York