Health-related quality of life instruments and other patient-reported outcomes;Instrumentos de medida de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y de otros resultados percibidos por los pacientes

Medicina Clinica

Volumn 125, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 56-60

  Valderas, José María ^a   Ferrer, Montse ^a   Alonso, Jordi ^a,b  

^a INST MUNIC D INVESTIGACIO MEDICA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Health related quality of life; Patient related outcomes; Questionnaires; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

AUTHORSHIP; CHECKLIST; CULTURE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 34547791777     PISSN: 00257753     EISSN: 15788989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13076466     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alonso J. La medida de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en la investigación y la práctica clínica. Gac Sanit. 2000;14:163-7.
2. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ. 2002;324:1417.
3. BiblioPRO. Biblioteca virtual de Instrumentos de Resultados Percibidos de Red IRYSS (Investigación sobre Resultados de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios) [citado 30 jun de 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.rediryss.net
4. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
5. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford; 1995.
6. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622-9.
7. Tully MP, Cantrill JA. Subjective outcome measurement: a primer. Pharm World Sci. 1999;21:101-9.
8. Badia X, Salamero M, Alonso J. La medida de la salud. Guía de escala de medición en español. Barcelona: Edimac; 2002.
9. Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, Leidy NK, Marquis P, Revicki D, et al; PRO Harmonization Group. Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003;6(5):522-31.
10. Apolone G, De Carli G, Brunetti M, Garattini S. An Evaluation of the EMEA recommendations on the use of Quality of Life measures in drug approval. Pharmaco Economics. 2001;19:187-95.
11. Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, Fulleton S, Aaronson N. Patient Reported Outcomes and Regulatory Issues: the Example of Health-related Quality of Life - A European Guidance Document for the Improved Integration of HRQL Assessment in the Drug Regulatory Process. Drug Information Journal. 2002;36:209-38.
12. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18:979-92.
13. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review Criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193-205.
14. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill; 1967.
15. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best Test Design. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1979.
16. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1982.
17. RB Kline. Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford Press; 1998.
18. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293-307.
19. Valderas JM on behalf of the PRO Scientific Committee, IRYSS Network. Development of a standardized assessment tool for patient reported outcomes: a pilot test with the ePRO instrument. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(9):2134.
20. Prieto L, Lamarca R, Casado A. La evaluación de la fiabilidad en las observaciones clínicas: el coeficiente de correlación intraclase. Med Clin (Barc). 1998;110:142-5.
21. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull. 1959;56:81-105.
22. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81 12 Suppl 2:S1-4.
23. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:142S-58S.
24. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PMM. On assessing responsiveness of health related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:349-62.
25. Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T and The Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:285-95.
26. Lydick E. Approaches to the interpretation of quality-of-life scales. Med Care. 2000;38 Suppl 9:II180-3.
27. Valderas JM, Alonso J, Prieto L, Espallargues M, Castells X. Content-based interpretation aids for health-related quality of life measures in clinical practice. An example for the visual function index (VF-14). Qual Life Res. 2004;13:35-44.
28. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:913-23.
29. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Bosi-Ferraz M. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-91.
30. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:323-35.
31. Guyatt GH. The philosophy of health -related quality of life translation. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:461-5.
32. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104.
33. The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403-9.