Three-Dimensional Manual Contact Force Evaluation of Graded Perpendicular Push Force Delivery by Second-Year Physiotherapy Students During Simple Feedback Training

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 438-449

  van Zoest, Gerrit G J M ^a   Staes, Filip F G M ^b   Stappaerts, Karel H ^b  

^a Kinesiometrics ^*  (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Evaluation; Feedback; Force; Learning; Motor Skill; Musculoskeletal Manipulations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; BIOMECHANICS; CHIROPRACTIC; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FORCE; GRADED PERPENDICULAR PUSH FORCE DELIVERY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINETICS; LEARNING; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PALPATION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; RANDOMIZATION; SENSOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL MANUAL CONTACT FORCE;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES;

EID: 34547783209     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kendall H., Peterson Kendall F., and Wadsworth G. Muscles, testing and function (1971), The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore 10-11
2. van Zoest G., van den Berg H., and Holtkamp F. Three-dimensionality of contact forces during clinical manual examination and treatment: a new measuring system. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17 (2002) 719-722
3. Aitkens S., Lord J., Bernauer E., Fowler W., Lieberman J., and Berck P. Relationship of manual muscle testing to objective strength measurements. Muscle Nerve 12 (1989) 173-177
4. Bohannon R. Manual muscle test scores and dynamometer test scores of knee extension strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67 (1986) 390-392
5. Dvir Z. Grade 4 in manual muscle testing: the problem with submaximal strength assessment. Clin Rehabil 11 (1997) 36-41
6. Hsieh C.-Y., and Philips R. Reliability of manual muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 13 (1990) 72-82
7. van der Ploeg R., Oosterhuis H., and Reuverkamp R. Measuring muscle strength. Neurology (1984) 200-203
8. Adams A., and Wood J. Forces used in selected chiropractic adjustments of the low back: a preliminary study. Palmer College of Chiropractic Research Forum (1984) 5-9
9. Björnsdóttir S., and Kumar S. Posterior spinal mobilisation: state of the art review and discussion. Disabil Rehabil 19 (1997) 39-46
10. Everaert D., Stappaerts K., Van Leemputte M., and Oostendorp R. Towards a measurement of paraspinal soft tissue mobility: development of a method and preliminary results. J Man Manipulative Ther 5 (1997) 12-19
11. Harms M., Cusick G., and Bader D. Measurement of spinal mobilisation forces. Physiotherapy 81 (1995) 599-604
12. Riddle D. Measurement of accessory motion: critical issues and related concepts. Phys Ther 72 (1992) 865-874
13. Simmonds M., Kumar S., and Lechelt E. Use of a spinal model to quantify the forces and motion that occur during therapists' tests of spinal motion. Phys Ther 75 (1995) 212-222
14. Gudavalli M. Force and speed characteristics of double transverse posterior to anterior thoracic adjustments by different chiropractors. J Chiropr Educ 20 (2006) 17-18
15. van Zoest G. Three-dimensional contact force measurement during clinical manual examination and treatment: a new measuring system and preliminary results. In: Singer K. (Ed). The 7th Scientific Conference of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists in Conjunction with the 11th Biennial Conference of the Manipulative Physiotherapists Association of Australia; 2000; The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia: International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists (2000) 451-455
16. van Zoest G. Three-dimensionality of direct contact forces in chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26 (2003) 549-556
17. van Zoest G. Dreidimensionalität direkter Kontaktkräfte während der klinischen manuellen Untersuchung und Behandlung. Manuelle Medizin 42 (2004) 208-219
18. Hardy G., and Napier J. Inter and intratherapist reliability of passive accessory movement technique. N Z J Physiother (1991) 22-24
19. Chester R., and Watson M. A newly developed spinal simulator. Man Ther 5 (2000) 234-242
20. Lee M., and Svensson N. Effect of loading frequency on response of the spine to lumbar posteroanterior forces. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 16 (1993) 439-446
21. Lee M., Latimer J., and Maher C. Normal response to large posteroanterior lumbar loads-a case study approach. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 20 (1997) 369-371
22. Adams A., and Wood J. Changes in force parameters with practice experience for selected low back adjustments. Palmer College of Chiropractic Research Forum 1985 (1985) 40-48
23. Cohen E., Triano J., McGregor M., and Papakyriakou M. Biomechanical performance of spinal manipulation therapy by newly trained vs. practicing providers: does experience transfer to unfamiliar procedures?. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18 (1995) 347-352
24. Jull G. Monitoring aspects of the development of undergraduate student skills in manual techniques. The Scientific Conference of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists; 1988; Cambridge: International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Therapists (1988)
25. Wood J., and Adams A. Comparison of forces used in selected adjustments of the low back by experienced chiropractors and chiropractic students with no clinical experience: a preliminary study. Palmer College of Chiropractic Research Forum (1984) 16-23 [Autumn]
26. Keating J., Matyas T., and Bach T. The effect of training on physical therapists' ability to apply specified forces of palpation. Phys Ther 73 (1993) 38-46
27. Lee M., Moseley A., and Refshauge K. Effect of feedback on learning vertebral joint mobilization skill. Phys Ther 70 (1990) 97-104
28. Pringle R. Guidance hypothesis with verbal feedback in learning a palpation skill. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27 (2004) 36-42
29. Scaringe J., Chen D., and Ross D. The effects of augmented sensory feedback precision on the acquisition and retention of a simulated chiropractic task. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 25 (2002) 34-41
30. Smythe H. Examination for tenderness: learning to use 4 kg force. J Rheumatol 25 (1997) 149-151
31. Triano J., Scaringe J., Bougie J., and Rogers C. Effect of visual feedback on manipulation performance and patient ratings. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 29 (2006) 378-385
32. Vander D., Linden W., Cauraugh J., and Greens T. The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther 73 (1993) 79-87
33. Harms M., Milton A., Cusik G., and Bader D. Instrumentation of a mobilization couch for dynamic load measurement. J Med Eng Technol 19 (1995) 119-122
34. Petty N., and Messenger N. Can the force platform be used to measure the forces applied during a PA mobilisation of the lumbar spine?. J Man Manipulative Ther 4 (1996) 70-76
35. Maitland G. Vertebral manipulation. 4th ed. (1979), Butterworths, London-Boston 82-86
36. Maitland G. Peripheral manipulation. 2nd ed. (1977), Buttersworth, London, UK 28-31 London
37. Campbell D., and Stanley J. Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research (1966), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston 6
38. Siegel S., and Castellan N. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York 51-55
39. Portney L., and Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research (2000), Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River (NY) 427-472
40. Binkley J., Stratford P., and Gill C. Interrater reliability of lumbar accessory motion mobility testing. Phys Ther 75 (1995) 786-795
41. Maher C., and Adams R. Reliability of pain and stiffness assessment in clinical manual lumbar spine examination. Phys Ther 74 (1994) 801-811
42. Matyas T., and Bach T. The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics. Aust J Physiother 31 (1985) 175-199
43. Schmidt R., and Lee T. Motor control and learning. 4th ed (2005), Human Kinetics, Champaign (Ill) 301-459
44. Chiradejnant A., Maher C., and Latimer J. Development of an instrumented couch to measure forces during manual physiotherapy treatment. Man Ther 6 (2001) 229-234
45. Triano J., and Schultz A. Loads transmitted during lumbosacral spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 22 (1997) 1955-1964
46. Triano J., Rogers C., Combs S., Potts D., and Sorrels K. Developing skilled performance of lumbar spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 25 (2002) 353-396
47. Triano J., Rogers C., Combs S., Potts D., and Sorrels K. Quantitative feedback versus standard training for cervical and thoracic manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26 (2003) 131-138