Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: Two sides of the same coin?

Brain

Volumn 130, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 2070-2084

  Savazzi, Silvia ^a   Posteraro, Lucio ^b   Veronesi, Gianluigi ^c   Mancini, Francesca ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b Rehabilitation Unit   (Italy)

^c Rehabilitation Unit   (Italy)

Author keywords

Crossover; Line extension; Oppel Kundt illusion; Space anisometry; Space distortion

Indexed keywords

ANISOMETROPIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; MODULATION; NEGLECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 34547735032     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm143     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973; 23: 658-64.
2. Bisiach E. The spatial features of unilateral neglect. In: Thier P, Karnath H, editors. Parietal lobe contribution to orientation in 3D space. Berlin: Springler Verlag; 1997.
3. Bisiach E, Bulgarelli C, Sterzi R, Vallar G. Line bisection and cognitive plasticity of unilateral neglect of space. Brain Cogn 1983; 2: 32-8.
4. Bisiach E, Neppi-Modona M, Genero R, Pepi R. Anisometry of space representation in unilateral neglect: empirical test of a former hypothesis. Conscious Cogn 1999; 8: 577-84.
5. Bisiach E, Neppi-Modona M, Ricci R. Space anisometry in unilateral neglect. In: Karnath H, Milner AD, Vallar G, editors. The cognitive and neural basis of spatial neglect. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
6. Bisiach E, Pizzamiglio L, Nico D, Antonucci G. Beyond unilateral neglect. Brain 1996; 119: 851-7.
7. Bisiach E, Ricci R, Modona MN. Visual awareness and anisometry of space representation in unilateral neglect: a panoramic investigation by means of a line extension task. Conscious Cogn 1998; 7: 327-55.
8. Bisiach E, Rusconi ML, Peretti VA, Vallar G. Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32: 1431-4.
9. Bowers D, Heilman K. Pseudoneglect: effects of hemisphere on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 1980; 18: 491-8.
10. Bulatov A, Bertulis A. Distortions of length perception. Biol Cybernetics 1999; 80: 185-93.
11. Bulatov A, Bertulis A, Mickienè L. Geometrical illusions: study and modelling. Biol Cybernetics 1997; 77: 395-406.
12. Chokron S, Bernard JM, Imbert M. Length representation in normal and neglect subjects with opposite reading habits studied through a line extension task. Cortex 1997; 33: 47-64.
13. Daini R, Angelelli P, Antonucci G, Cappa S, Vallar G. Illusions of length in spatial unilateral neglect. Cortex 2001; 37: 710-4.
14. Daini R, Angelelli P, Antonucci G, Cappa S, Vallar G. Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length. Exp Brain Res 2002; 144: 224-37.
15. Diller L, Weinberg J. Heminattention in rehabilitation. In: Weinstein AE, Friedland RP, editors. Heminattention and hemisphere specialisation. New York: Raven; 1977.
16. Driver J, Halligan PW. Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? Cogn Neuropsychol 1991; 8: 475-96.
17. Doricchi F, Guariglia P, Figliozzi F, Silvetti M, Bruno G, Gasparini M. Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements. Brain 2005; 128: 1386-406.
18. Eglin M, Robertson LC, Knight RT. Visual search performance in the neglect syndrome. J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1: 372-85.
19. Ffytche DH, Zeki S. Brain activity related to the perception of illusory contours. Neuroimage 1996; 3: 104-8.
20. Gainotti G, Tiacci C. The relationships between disorders of visual perception and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 451-8.
21. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1988; 24: 321-8.
22. Heilman KM, Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Ann Neurol 1979; 5: 166-70.
23. Hirsch J, Delapaz RL, Relkin NR, Victor J, Kim K, Li T, et al. Illusory contours activate specific regions in human visual cortex. Evidence from functional magnetic-resonance-imaging. PNAS, USA 1995; 92: 6469-73.
24. Irving-Bell L, Small M, Cowey A. A distortion of perceived space in patients with right-hemisphere lesions and visual hemineglect. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 919-25.
25. Ishiai S. What do eye-fixation patterns tell us about unilateral spatial neglect? Restor Neurol Neurosci 2006; 24: 261-71.
26. Jewell G, McCourt ME. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 93-110.
27. Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Adv Neurol 1977; 18: 41-9.
28. Kundt A. Untersuchungen über augenmass und optische täuschungen. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 1863; 120: 118-58.
29. Mark VS, Kooistra CA, Heilman KM. Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology 1988; 38: 1207-11.
30. Marshall JC, Halligan PW. When right goes left: an investigation of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 1989; 25: 503-15.
31. Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Sharma R. Stimulus context in hemineglect. Brain 1998; 121: 2003-10.
32. Mennemeier M, Pierce CA, Chatterjee A, Anderson B, Jewell G, Dowler R, et al. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both. J Cogn Neurosci 2005; 17: 1194-211.
33. Milner AD. Animal models for the syndrome of spatial neglect. In: Jeannerod M, editor. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1987. p. 259-88.
34. Milner AD, Harvey M. Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect. Curr Biol 1995; 5(1): 85-9.
35. Milner AD, Harvey M, Pritchard CL. Visual size processing in spatial neglect. Exp Brain Res 1998; 123(1-2): 192-200.
36. Milner AD, Harvey M, Roberts RC, Forster SV. Line bisection errors in visual neglect: misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia 1993; 31(1): 39-49.
37. Monaghan P, Shillcock R. The crossover effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task. Brain 1998; 121: 907-21.
38. Neppi-Modona M, Savazzi S, Ricci R, Genero R, Berruti G, Pepi R. Unilateral neglect and perceptual parsing: a large-group study. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 1918-29.
39. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ, Rafal RD. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci 1984; 4: 1863-74.
40. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FA, Rafal RD. How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? Neuropsychologia 1987; 25: 135-45.
41. Ricci R, Calhoun J, Chatterjee A. Orientation bias in unilateral neglect: representational contributions. Cortex 2000; 36: 671-7.
42. Ricci R, Chatterjee A. Context and crossover in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1138-43.
43. Ricci R, Pia L, Gindri P. Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect. Exp Brain Res 2004; 154: 226-37.
44. Rode G, Michel C, Rossetti Y, Boisson D, Vallar G. Left size distortion (hyperschematia) after right brain damage. Neurology 2006; 67: 1801-8.
45. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980; 30: 509-17.
46. Vallar G, Daini R, Antonucci G. Processing of illusion of length in spatial hemineglect: a study of line bisection. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 1087-97.
47. Watt R. Some points about human vision and visual neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1994; 4: 213-9.
48. Weidner R, Fink GR. The neural mechanisms underlying the Muller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 878-84.