Effective size of fluctuating populations with two sexes and overlapping generations

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1873-1885

  Engen, Steinar ^a   Ringsby, Thor Harald ^a   Sæther, Bernt Erik ^a   Lande, Russell ^b   Jensen, Henrik ^a   Lillegård, Magnar ^a   Ellegren, Hans ^c  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Demographic variance; Fluctuating populations; Genetic drift; House sparrow; Overlapping generations

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHIC TREND; GENERATION TIME; GENETIC DRIFT; ISLAND; POPULATION ESTIMATION; POPULATION SIZE; SEX RATIO; STOCHASTICITY; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; MALE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPARROW; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SEX FACTORS; SPARROWS; TIME FACTORS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA;

PASSER DOMESTICUS;

EID: 34547689832     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00155.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Altwegg, R., T. H. Ringsby, and B.-E. Sæther. 2000. Phenotypic correlates and consequences of dispersal in a metapopulation of house sparrows J. Anim. Ecol. 69 : 762 770.
2. Caballero, A. 1994. Developments in prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73 : 657 673.
3. Caro, T. 1998. The significance of behavioral ecology for conservation biology. Pp. 3-26 in T. Caro, ed. Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
4. Caswell, H. 1978. A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters. Theor. Pop. Biol. 14 : 215 230.
5. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models. 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
6. Charlesworth, B. 2001. The effect of life-history and mode of inheritance on neutral genetic variability. Genet. Res. 77 : 153 166.
7. Charnov, E. L. 1993. Life history invariants. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
8. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1998. Reproductive success. Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Coltman, D. W. 2005. Testing marker-based estimates of heritability in the field. Mol. Ecol. 14 : 2593 2599.
10. Coltman, D. W., P. O'Donoghue, J. T. Jorgenson, J. T. Hogg, C. Strobeck C., and M. Festa-Bianchet. 2003. Undesirable evolutionary consequences of trophy hunting. Nature 426 : 655 658.
11. Creel, S. 1998. Social organization and effective population sizes in carnivores. Pp. 246 265 in T. Caro, ed. Behavioral ecology and conservation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
12. Crow, J. F., and C. Denniston. 1988. Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution 42 : 482 495.
13. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Burgess Publishing Company/ALPHA EDITIONS, Minneapolis, MN.
14. Emigh, T., and E. Pollak. 1979. Fixation probabilities and effective population numbers in diploid populations with overlapping generations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 15 : 86 107.
15. Engen, S., Ø. Bakke, and A. Islam. 1998. Demographic and environmental stochasticity - concepts and definitions. Biometrics 54 : 39 45.
16. Engen, S., B.-E. Sæther, and A. P. Møller. 2001. Stochastic population dynamics and time to extinction of a declining population of barn swallow. J. Anim. Ecol. 70 : 789 797.
17. Engen, S., R. Lande, and B.-E. Sæther. 2003. Demographic stochasticity and Allee effects in populations with two sexes. Ecology 84 : 2378 2386.
18. Engen, S., R. Lande, B.-E. Sæther, and H. Weimerskirch. 2005a. Extinction in relation to demographic and environmental stochasticity in age structured models. Math. Biosc. 195 : 210 227.
19. Engen, S., R. Lande, and B.-E. Sæther. 2005b. Effective size of a fluctuating age structured population. Genetics 170 : 941 954.
20. Felsenstein, J. 1971. Inbreeding and variance effective numbers in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 68 : 581 597.
21. Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population-size adult population-size ratio in wildlife - a review. Genet. Res. 66 : 95 107.
22. Frankham, R., J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
23. Garant, D., and L. B. Kruuk. 2005. How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Mol. Ecol. 14 : 1843 1859.
24. Grant, P. R. and B. R. Grant. 1992. Demography and the genetically effective sizes of two populations of Darwin finches. Ecology 73 : 766 784.
25. Hedrick, P. W. 2005. Large variance in reproductive success and theNe/N ratio. Evolution 59 : 1596 1599.
26. Hill, W. G. 1972. Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3 : 278 289.
27. Hill, W. G. 1979. A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. Genetics 92 : 317 322.
28. Hughes, C. 1998. Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecology 79 : 383 399.
29. Jensen, H., B. E. Sæther, T. H. Ringsby, J. Tufto, S. C. Griffith, and H. Ellegren. 2003. Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 1296 1307.
30. Jensen, H., 2004. Lifetime reproductive success in relation to morphology in the house sparrows Passer domesticus. J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 599 611.
31. Jones, A. G., and W. R. Ardren. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12 : 2511 2523.
32. Kalinowski, S. T., and R. S. Waples. 2002. Relationship of effective to census size in fluctuating populations. Conserv. Biol. 16 : 129 136.
33. Karlin, S., and H. M. Taylor. 1981. A second course in stochastic processes. Academic Press, New York.
34. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
35. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33 : 402 416.
36. Lande, R. 1980. Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. Am. Nat. 116 : 463 479.
37. Lande, R. 1985. Expected time for random genetic drift of a population between stable phenotypic states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 : 7641 7645.
38. Lande, R., and G. F. Barrowclough. 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. Pp. 87 123 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
39. Lande, R., S. Engen, and B.-E. Sæther. 2003. Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
40. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7 : 639 655.
41. Møller, A. P., and P. Ninni. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43 : 345 358.
42. Newton, I. 1989. Lifetime reproductive success in birds. Academic Press, London.
43. Nunney, L. 1991. The influence of age structure and fecundity on effective population size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 246 : 71 76.
44. Nunney, L. 1993. The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47 : 1329 1341.
45. Nunney, L. 2000. The limits to knowledge in conservation genetics. The value of effective population size. Evol. Biol. 32 : 179 194.
46. Nunney, L., and D. R. Elam. 1994. Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conserv. Biol. 8 : 175 184.
47. Orive, M. E. 1993. Effective population size in organisms with complex life-histories. Theor. Pop. Biol. 44 : 316 340.
48. Pollak, E. 2000. The effective population size of some age structured populations. Math. Biosc. 168 : 39 65.
49. Promislow, D. E. L. 1992. Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 247 : 203 210.
50. Promislow, D. E. L., R. Montgomerie, and T. E. Martin. 1992. Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond B 250 : 143 150.
51. Ringsby, T. H., B.-E. Sæther, and E. J. Solberg. 1998. Factors affecting juvenile survival in House Sparrow Passer domesticus. J. Avian Biol. 29 : 241 247.
52. Ringsby, T. H., B.-E. Sæther, R. Altwegg, and E. J. Solberg. 1999. Temporal and spatial variation in survival rates of a sparrow, Passer domesticus, metapopulation. Oikos 85 : 419 425.
53. Ringsby, T. H., B.-E. Sæther, J. Tufto, H. Jensen, and E. J. Solberg. 2002. Asynchronous spatiotemporal demography of a house sparrow metapopulation in a correlated environment. Ecology 83 : 561 569.
54. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
55. Slate, J., T. Marshall, and J. Pemberton. 2000. A retrospective assessment of the accuracy of the paternity inference program CERVUS. Mol. Ecol. 9 : 801 808.
56. Sæther, B.-E., and Ø. Bakke. 2000. Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81 : 642 653.
57. Sæther, B.-E., S. Engen, A. Islam, R. McCleery, and C. Perrins. 1998. Environmental stochasticity and extinction risk in a population of small song bird, the great tit. Am. Nat. 151 : 441 50.
58. Sæther, B.-E., T. H. Ringsby, Ø. Bakke, and E. J. Solberg. 1999. Spatial and temporal variation in demography of a house sparrow metapopulation. J. Anim. Ecol. 68 : 628 637.
59. Sæther, B.-E., S. Engen, R. Lande, A. P. Møller, S. Bensch, D. Hasselquist, J. Beier, and B. Leisler. 2004a. Time to extinction in relation to mating system and type of density regulation in populations with two sexes. J. Anim. Ecol. 73 : 925 934.
60. Sæther, B. E., S. Engen, A. P. Møller, H. Weimerskirch, M. E. Visser, W. Fiedler, E. Matthysen, M. M. Lambrechts, A. Badyaev, P. H. Becker, J. E. Brommer, D. Bukacinski, M. Bukacinska, H. Christensen, J. Dickinson, C. du Feu, F. Gehlbach, D. Heg, H. Hötker J. Merilä, J. T. Nielsen, W. Rendell, R. J. Robertson, D. L. Thomson, J. Török, and P. Van Hecke. 2004b. Life-history variation predicts the effects of demographic stochasticity on avian population dynamics. Am. Nat. 164 : 793 802.
61. Tufto, J., T. H. Ringsby, A. A. Dhondt, F. Adriaensen, and E. Matthysen. 2005. A parametric model for estimation of dispersal patterns applied to five passerine spatially structured populations. Am. Nat. 165 : E13 E26.
62. Vucetich, J. A., T. A. Waite, and L. Nunney. 1997. Fluctuating population size and the ratio of effective to census population size. Evolution 51 : 2017 2021.
63. Waples, R. S. 2002. The effective size of fluctuating salmon populations. Genetics 161 : 783 791.
64. Waples, R. S. 2006. Seed banks, salmon and sleeping genes: effective population size in semelparous, age structured species with fluctuating abundance. Am. Nat. 167 : 118 135.
65. Westneat, D. F. and I. R. K. Stewart. 2003. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34 : 365 396.
66. Whittinghan, L. A. and P. O. Dunn. 2005. Extra-pair and within-pair copulation reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds. Behav. Ecol. 16 : 138 144.
67. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16 : 98 160.
68. Wright, S. 1938. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87 : 430 431.
69. Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 2. The theory of gene frequencies. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.