Towards context-aware product-family architectures

Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software Product Management, IWSPM'06

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 38-43

  Salifu, Mohammed ^a   Nuseibeh, Bashar ^a   Rapanotti, Lucia ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dynamic adaptability; Product line architectures; Static adaptability; Variability points

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; CONTEXT SENSITIVE GRAMMARS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

DYNAMIC ADAPTABILITY; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; STATIC ADAPTABILITY; VARIABILITY MECHANISMS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 34547679712     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IWSPM.2006.10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Apel, S. and K. Böhm. Towards the Development of Ubiquitous Middleware Product Lines. in Software Engineering and Middleware: 4th International Workshop, SEM 2004. 2005. Linz, Austria.
2. Bachmann, F. and L. Bass. Managing Variability in Software Architectures. in SSR '01. 2001. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: ACM Press.
3. Bühne, S., G. Halmans, and K. Pohl. Modelling Dependencies between Variation Points in Use Case Diagrams. in Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality(REFSQ). 2003. Klagenfurt, Austria.
4. Chen, G. and D. Kotz, A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research, in Technical Report TR2000-381. 2000, Dartmouth Computer Science.
5. Claycamp, H.J. and W.F. Massy, A Theory of Market Segmentation. Journal of Marketing Research, 1968. 5(4): p. 388-394.
6. Cockburn, A., Writing effective use cases. 1st ed. 2001, Longman, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley. 1-304.
7. Cox, K., Jon G. Hall, and L. Rapanotti, A Roadmap of Problem Frames research, in To appear: Journal of Information and Software Technology. 2005.
8. Dickson, P.R. and J.L. Ginter, Market Segmentation, Product Differentiation, and Marketing Strategy. Journal of Marketing, 1987. 51(2): p. 1-10.
9. ESAPS, Overview. 2002, Engineering Software Architectures, Processes and Platforms for System-Families: http://www.esi.es/esaps/ overview.html.
10. Gomaa, H. and M. Hussein, Dynamic Software Reconfiguration in Software Product Families. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004. 3014/2004: p. 435-444.
11. Gomaa, H. and M. Hussein. Software Reconfiguration Patterns for Dynamic Evolution of Software Architectures, in Proceedings of the Fourth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA '04). 2004: IEEE CNF.
12. Harter, n., et al., The Anatomy of a Context-Aware Application. Wireless Networks, 2002. 8(2-3): p. 187-197.
13. Hoek, A.v.d. Configurable Software Architecture in Support of Configuration Management and Software Deployment, in INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING. 1999.
14. Jackson, M., Problme Frames: Analyzing and structuring software development problems. 1st ed. 2001b, New York, Oxoford: Addison-Wesley. 390.
15. Jackson, M. The World and the Machine, in ICSE'95. 1995. Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM.
16. Jaring, M. and J. Bosch. Representing Variability in Software Product Lines: A Case Study, in SPLC2 2002, LNC2379. 2002: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Jaring, M. and J. Bosch. A Taxonomy and Hierarchy of Variability Dependencies in Software Product Family Engineering, in Proc. of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC04). 2004: IEEE CNF.
18. Jaring, M., R.L. Krikharr, and J. Bosch, Representing variabilities in a family of MRI scanners. Software-Practice And Experiance, 2004. 34: p. 69-100.
19. Kazman, R., et al. SAAM: A Method for Analyzing the Properties of Software Architectures, in Software Engineering, 1994. Proceedings. ICSE-16., 16th International Conference. 1994.
20. Kazman, R., Mark Klein, and Mario Barbacci. The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method. in Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, 1998. ICECCS '98. Proceedings. Fourth IEEE International Conference. 1998.
21. Kim, M., J. Jeong, and S. Park. From Product Lines to Self-Managed Systems: An Architecture-Based Runtime Reconfiguration Framework, in Workshop on the Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software (DEAS 2005. 2005: ACM Press.
22. Kramer, J. and J. Magee, The evolving philosophers problem: dynamic change management. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1990. 16(11).
23. Maccari, A. and A. Heie, Managing infinite variability in mobile terminal software. SOFTWARE - PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE, 2005. 35(6): p. 513-53.
24. Mannion, M., et al. Representing Requirements on Generic Software in an Application Family Model. in ICSR. 2000: Springer-Verlag.
25. Moorthy, K.S., Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design. Marketing Science, 1984. 3(4): p. 288-307.
26. Nokia, Nokia Architecture - Platform Architectures. 2005, Nokia http://europe.nokia.com/nokia/0,62611.00.html: Online. p. 1-2.
27. OMA, O.M.A., OMA Architecture Principles V1.2. 2004, Open Mobile Alliance - OMA Ltd. p. 1-10.
28. Oreizy, P., et al., An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software. Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, IEEE [see also IEEE Intelligent Systems, 1999. 14(3).
29. Pascoe, J. Adding Generic Contextual Capabilities to Wearable Computers, in Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on... 1998. Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
30. Perry, D.E. Generic Architecture Descriptions for Product Lines, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 1998: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
31. Pohl, K., G. Böckle, and F.J.v.d. Linden, Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. 1 ed. 2005: Springer. 468.
32. Rapanotti, L., et al. Architecture-driven Problem Decomposition, in Proceedings of the IEEE RE 04 conference. 2004.
33. Rozanski, N. and E. Woods, Software Systems Architecture. 2005, London: Addison-Wesley Profession. 27-37.
34. Schilit, B.N., N. Adams, and R. Want. Context-Aware Computing Applications. in Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 1994.
35. Sinnema, M., S. Deelstra, and J. Bosch. COVAMOF: A Framework for Modelling Variabilities in Software Product Families, in SPLC'04. 2004: Springer-Verlag.
36. Sinnema, M., et al. Modeling Dependencies in Product Families with COVAMOF. in Proceedings of the 13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS'06). 2006: IEEE CNF.
37. Svahnberg, M., J.v. Gurp, and J. Bosch, A taxonomy of variability realization techniques. Software: Practice and Experience, 2005. 35(8): p. 705-754.
38. Van Lamsweerde, A., R. Darimont, and P. Massonet. Goal-directed elaboration of requirements for a meeting scheduler: problems and lessons learnt. in Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on. 1995.