From product lines to self-managed systems: An architecture-based runtime reconfiguration framework

Proceedings of the 2005 Workshop on Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software, DEAS 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Kim, Minseong ^a   Jeong, Jaemin ^b   Park, Sooyong ^a  

^a Sogang University   (South Korea)

^b SAMSUNG Electronics   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DYNAMIC MODELS;

ARCHITECTURE-BASED; DYNAMIC RE-CONFIGURATION; DYNAMIC SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES; EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS; HIGH AVAILABILITY; RECONFIGURABLE COMPONENTS; RUN TIME RECONFIGURATION; USER REQUIREMENTS;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 84866011166     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1083063.1083078     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Bosch. Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2000.
2. P. Clements, L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, Mass., 2001.
3. P. Oreizy, M. M. Gorlick, R. N. Taylor, D. Heimbigner, G. Johnson, N. Medvidovic, A. Quilici, D. S. Rosenblum, A. L. Wolf. An Architecture Based Approach to Self-Adaptive Software. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 1999.
4. P. Oreizy et al., Architecture-Based Runtime Software Evolution, Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Soft. Eng., Kyoto, Japan, April 19-25, 1998.
5. V. Polandian et al., Dynamic Configuration of Resource-Aware Services. Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Soft. Eng. (ICSE'04), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2004, pp. 604-613.
6. J. Gurp et al., On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines. In Proc. of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Software Architecture (WICSA'01), 2001.
7. J. Coplien et al., Commonality and Variability in Software Engineering. IEEE Software, Vol. 15, No. 6, Nov/Dec. 1998, 37-45.
8. B. Keepence, M. Mannion. Using Patterns to Model Variability in Product Families. IEEE Software, July/August 1999, 102-108.
9. B. R. Schmerl, C. D. Marlin: Versioning and consistency for dynamically composed configurations; 7th Int. Workshop on Configuration Management, Boston, May 1997.
10. J. Hillman, I. Warren, An Open Framework for Dynamic Reconfiguration, Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Soft. Eng. (ICSE'04), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2004, pp. 594-603.
11. L. Bass, P. Clements, R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, Addison Wesley Longman, 2003.
12. D. B. Stewart, P. K. Khosla. The chimera methodology: Designing dynamically reconfigurable and reusable real-time software using port-based objects. Int. Journal of Soft. Eng. and Knowledge Eng., 6(2):249-277, 1996.
13. P. Linz, An Introduction to Formal Languages and Automata, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2000.
14. Weiss, D. M., Lai, C. T. R.: Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., 1999.
15. Czarnecki, K, Eisenecker, U.: Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 2000.
16. C. Krueger. Variation Management for Software Production Lines. G. Chastek, ed., Proc. 2nd Software Product Line Conf., Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2379, Heidelberg, Germany, 2002, 37-48.
17. H. Gomaa, M. Hussein, Software Reconfiguration Patterns for Dynamic Evolution of Software Architectures, In Proc. of 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Software Architecture (WICSA'04), 2004.
18. Shrivastava, S. et al, Architectural Support for Dynamic Reconfiguration of Large Scale Distributed Applications, Proc Inter Conf on Configurable Distributed Systems, Annapolis, MD, May 1996.
19. D. Garlan, B. Schmerl. Model-based adaptation for selfhealing systems. InWorkshop on self-healing systems, 2002.
20. J. Kramer, J. Magee, The Evolving Philosophers Problem: Dynamic Change Management, IEEE Trans. on Soft. Eng, Vol. 16, No. 11, Nov. 1990.
21. S. Park, M. Kim, V. Sugumaran. A Scenario, Goal and Feature Oriented Domain Analysis Approach for Developing Software Product Lines. IMDS, Vol. 104 No. 4, 2004, pp. 296-308.
22. J. Kim, M. Kim, H. Yang, S. Park, A Method and Tool Support for Variant Requirements Analysis: Goal and Scenario Based Approach, Proc. of 11th Asia Pacific Soft. Eng. Conf. (APSEC 2004), Busan, Korea, Dec. 2004, pp. 168-175.
23. M. Fowler, K. Scott, UML Distilled 2nd Edition, Addison Wesley, 2000.