Treatment of concentrated arsenic(V) solutions by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with high molecular weight cut-off membrane

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 148, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 116-121

  Beolchini, F ^a   Pagnanelli, F ^b   De Michelis, I ^c   Veglio F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arsenic; Micellar enhanced ultrafiltration; Polyethersulphone membrane

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MEMBRANES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PH EFFECTS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE; MICELLAR ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION; POLYETHERSULPHONE MEMBRANE;

METAL RECOVERY;

ARSENIC DERIVATIVE; CETYLPYRIDINIUM SALT; POLYETHERSULFONE; SURFACTANT;

ARSENIC; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); MEMBRANES; METAL RECOVERY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PH EFFECTS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ARSENIC; PH; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT; SURFACTANT; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ARTICLE; IONIC STRENGTH; MEMBRANE FILTER; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PH; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ARSENIC; FILTRATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MICELLES; PRESSURE; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 34547678539     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.031     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gecol H., Ergican E., and Fuchs A. Molecular level separation of arsenic(V) from water using cationic surfactant micelles and ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 241 (2004) 105-119
2. Baek K., Kim B.K., Cho H.J., and Yang J.W. Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. B99 (2003) 303-311
3. Baek K., and Yang J.W. Cross-flow micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of nitrate and chromate: competitive binding. J. Hazard. Mater. B108 (2004) 119-123
4. Gzara L., and Dhahbi M. Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using cationic surfactants. Desalination 137 (2001) 241-250
5. Juang R.S., Xu Y.Y., and Chen C.L. Separation and removal of metal ions from dilute solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 218 (2003) 257-267
6. Morel G., Ouazzani N., Graciaa A., and Lachaise J. Surfactant modified ultrafiltration for nitrate ion removal. J. Membr. Sci. 134 (1997) 47-57
7. Reiller P., Lemordant D., Hafiane A., Moulin C., and Beaucaire C. extraction and release of metal ions by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration: influence of complexation and pH. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 177 (1996) 519-527
8. Sadaoui Z., Azoug C., Charbit G., and Charbit F. Surfactant for separation processes: enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Environ. Eng. (August 1998) 695-700
9. Yoon J., Yoon Y., Amy G., Cho J., Foss D., and Kim T.H. Use of surfactant modified ultrafiltration for perchlorate removal. Water Res. 37 (2003) 2001-2012
10. Sabaté J., Pujola M., and Llorens J. Comparison of polysulfone and ceramic membranes for the separation of phenol in micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 246 (2002) 157-163
11. Dunn R.O., and Scamehorn J.F. Concentration Polarisation effects in the use of micellar enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organic pollutants from wastewaters. Sep. Sci. Technol. 22 (1987) 763-789
12. Hong J., Yang S.M., Lee C.H., Choi Y.K., and Kajiuchi T. Ultrafiltration of divalent metal cations from aqueous solution using polycarboxylic acid type biosurfactant. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 202 (1998) 63-73
13. Fillipi B.R., Brant L.W., Scamehorn J.F., and Christian S.D. Use of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration at low surfactant concentrations and with anionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 213 (1999) 68-80
14. Brandhuber P., and Amy G. Arsenic removal by a charged ultrafiltration membrane: influences of membrane operating conditions and water quality on arsenic rejection. Desalinisation 140 (2001) 1-14
15. Ariza M.J., and Benavente J. Streaming potential along the surface of the polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 190 (2001) 119-132
16. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook (1998), Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., Lancaster, Basel, Switzerland
17. Brandhuber P., and Amy G. Alternative methods for membrane filtration of arsenic from drinking water. Desalinisation 117 (1998) 1-10
18. Shih M.C. An overview of arsenic removal by pressure-driven membrane processes. Desalination 172 (2005) 85-97
19. Kuyucak N. Role of microorganisms in mining: generation of acid rock drainage and its mitigation and treatment. Eur. J. Miner. Process. Environ. Protect. 2 (2002) 179-196
20. 3+ at low surfactant concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 217 (2003) 181-192
21. Beolchini F., Pagnanelli F., and Vegliò F. Kinetic modeling of copper biosorption by Arthrobacter sp. in a UF/MF membrane reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 3048-3054
22. Pagnanelli F., Beolchini F., Di Biase A., and Vegliò F. Biosorption of binary heavy metal systems onto Sphaerotilus natans cells confined in an UF/MF membrane reactor: dynamic simulations by different Langmuir-type competitive models. Water Res. 38 (2004) 1055-1061
23. Rivas B.L., Pereira E.D., and Moreno-Villoslada I. Water-soluble polymer-metal ion interactions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 28 (2003) 173-208