Automatic sensitivity analysis of a finite volume model for two-dimensional shallow water flows

Environmental Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 303-315

  Souhar, O ^a   Faure, J B ^a   Paquier, A ^a  

^a CENTRE DE LYON VILLEURBANNE   (France)

Author keywords

Automatic differentiation; Hydraulic model; Sensitivity analysis; Steady flow; Uncertainty propagation

Indexed keywords

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW OF WATER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STEADY FLOW; TWO DIMENSIONAL; WATER LEVELS;

FINITE VOLUME METHOD; FLOW MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHALLOW-WATER EQUATION; SOFTWARE; STEADY FLOW; TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLOW;

EID: 34547666816     PISSN: 15677419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-007-9028-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Buecker HM, Corliss G, Hovland P, Naumann U, Noriss B (2005) Automatic differentiation: Applications, theory and tools. Springer, New York (NY), Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Chapter 34, pp 293-298
2. Carle A, Fagan M (2000) ADIFOR 3.0 overview. Rice University Report CAAM-TR-00-02
3. Castaings W, Dartus D, Honnorat M, Le Dimet FX, Loukili Y, Monnier J (2004) Automatic differentiation: A tool for variational data assimilation and adjoint sensitivity analysis for flood modelling. AD 2004 - Fourth international workshop on automatic differentiation, Argonne National Laboratory, Gleatcher Center, Chicago, IL, USA, 19-23, July 2004
4. Corliss G, Faure C, Griewank A, Hascoet L, Naumann U (2001) Automatic differentiation of algorithms from simulation to optimization. Springer, Computer and Information Science
5. Dhervillez L (2001) Incertitudes sur l'extension d'une zone inondable. DESS Thesis, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France, p 110
6. Faure JB, Dhervillez L and Vidal JP (2002). Automatic evaluation of the uncertainty on a flooded area. Hydroinformatics'2002, Cardiff, UK
7. Galland JC, Hervouet JM, Rouge D, Thellier P (1991) Code TELEMAC, Version 1.0, Note de validation. Electricité de France/Direction des études et Recherches HE-42/90.06
8. Giering R (1997) Tangent linear and adjoint model compiler, users manual. http://www. autodiff.com/tamc, FastOpt Gmbh.
9. Gilbert JC (1992). Automatic differentiation and iterative processes. Optim Method Softw 1: 13-21
10. Gilbert JC and Lemaréchal C (1989). Some numerical experiments with variable storage quasi-Newton algorithms. Math Program 45: 407-435
11. Giraud FM, Faure JB, Zimmer D, Lefeuvre JC and Skaggs RW (1997). Hydrologic modeling of a complex wetland. J Irrig Drain Eng 123(5): 344-353
12. Griewank A (1993) Some bounds on the complexity of gradients, Jacobians, and Hessians. In: Pardalos PM (ed) Complexity in nonlinear optimization, World Scientific Publishers, pp 128-161
13. Griewank A (2000) Evaluating derivatives: Principales and techniques of algorithmic differentiation. Number 19 in Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia
14. Hascoet L, Pascual V (2004) Tapenade 2.1 user's guide. Rapport INRIA n 300, http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rt-0300.html. Septembre 2004 78p
15. Inria, Projet TROPICS, TAPENADE tutorial. http://www-sop.inria.fr/ tropics/
16. Lai C (1986). Numerical modelling of unsteady open-channel flow. Adv Hydrosc 14: 162-323
17. Mignot E (2005) Etude expérimentale et numérique de l'inondation d'une zone urbanisée: Cas des écoulements dans les carrefours en croix. PhD thesis, en Mécanique, Ecole Centrale de Lyon
18. Mignot E, Paquier A and Haider S (2006). Modeling floods in a dense urban area using 2D shallow water equations. J Hydrol 327(1-2): 186-199
19. Mignot E, Paquier A and Ishigaki T (2006). Comparison of numerical and experimental simulations of a flood in a dense urban area. Water sci Technol 54(6-7): 65-73
20. Naaim M (1991) Numerical modelling of hydrodynamic effects caused by a solid sliding in a reservoir. PhD thesis, de l'université Joseph Fourier Grenoble 1
21. Paquier A (1995) Modélisation et simulation de la propagation de l'onde de rupture de barrage. PhD thesis, de l'université de Saint-Etienne
22. Paquier A (1998) 1-D and 2-D models for simulating dam-break waves and natural floods. Union Européenne CADAM meeting, Wallingford, GBR, Mars 1998
23. Paquier A (2003). Surface flows during high floods in towns. Houille blanche 6: 89-93
24. Paquier A, Farissier P (1996) Use of a 2-D model for simulating the flooding of a plain. Hydroinformatics'96, Muller, pp 129-136
25. Paquier A, Mignot E (2003) Use of 2D models to calculate flood water levels: Calibration and sensitivity analysis. XXX IAHR congress, Thessaloniki, GRC, pp 24-29 August 2003
26. Paquier A, Tanguy JM, Haider S and Zhang B (2003). Estimation of the flood levels for a flash flood in urban area: Comparison of two hydrodynamic models on the 1988's Nîmes flood. Revue des sciences de l'eau 16(1): 79-102
27. Proust S, Rivière N, Bousmar D, Paquier A, Zech Y and Morel R (2006). Flow in compound channel with abrupt floodplain contraction. J Hydraul Eng 132(9): 958-970
28. Rall LB (1981). Automatic differentiation techniques and applications. Lecture notes in computer science 120,. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
29. Roe PL (1981). Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. J Comput Phys. 43: 357-372
30. Souhar O (2006) Evaluation of uncertainties for 1-D fluvial model. Automatic differentiation of 2-D Shallow water flows by Tapenade. Tech. Rep., Cemagref de Lyon, CHHLY.20108 (LY), p 31