Estimation of the flood levels for a flash flood in urban area: Comparison of two hydrodynamic models on the 1988's Nîmes flood;Estimation des niveaux d'inondation pour une crue éclair en milieu urbain: Comparaison de deux modèles hydrodynamiques sur la crue de Nîmes d'octobre 1988

Revue des Sciences de l'Eau

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 79-102

  Paquier, A ^a   Tanguy, J M ^b   Haider, S ^a   Zhang, B ^c  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b CETE Méditerran   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

Author keywords

1 D software; 2 D software; De Saint Venant equations; Flash floods; Hydraulic jump; Hydrodynamic modelling; October 1988 n mes flood; Urban risk

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; DIFFUSION; FINITE VOLUME METHOD; HYDRAULICS; HYDROLOGY; RAIN; SEWAGE;

FLASH FLOODS;

FLOODS;

FLOOD; HYDRODYNAMICS; URBAN AREA;

FLASH FLOOD; FLOODING; HYDRODYNAMICS; URBAN AREA;

FRANCE; LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON; NIMES;

CHRISTIA;

EID: 0037694088     PISSN: 09927158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7202/705499ar     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AL MIKDAD O., 2000. Modélisation des écoulements en réseaux maillés et ramifiés. Thése de doctorat, université de technologie de Compiégne, 250 p.
2. CAMPANA N.A., TUCCI C.E.M., 2001. Predicting floods from urban development scenarios: case study of the Dilluvio basin, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Urban Water, 3, 113-124.
3. DESBORDES M., DUREPAIRE P., GILLY J.C., MASSON J.M., MAURIN Y., 1989. 3 octobre 1988: inondations sur Nimes et sa région - Manifestations, causes et conséquences, Nimes, France, Lacour, 96 p.
4. GALLATI M., BRASCHI G., 1990. Simulation of the inondation of large areas of complex topography caused by heavy floods. In: BLAIN E., OUAZAR D. (éd.), HYDROSOFT 90. Int. Conf. Hydraulic Engineering Software Applications, Lowell, Massachussets, États-Unis, Computational Mechanics Publications, 117-126.
5. HAIDER S., 2001. Contribution à la modélisation d'une inondation en zone urbanisée. Approche bidimensionnelle par les équations de Saint Venant. Thése de doctorat, Lyon, Institut des sciences appliquées, 173 p.
6. HERVOUET J.-M., SAMIE R., MOREAU B., 2000. Modelling urban areas in dam-break flood wave numerical simulations. RESCDAM workshop, Seinäjoki, Finland, 12 p.
7. HINGRAY B., BOUVIER C., CAPPELAERE B., DESBORDES M., 2000. Inondations urbaines dans les PED : un indicateur géométrique caractéristique du comportement hydrodynamique du bâti. Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 13 (1), 85-100.
8. HSU M.-H., CHEN S.-H., CHANG T.-J. 2002. Dynamic inundation simulation of storm water interaction between sewer system and overland flows. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 25 (2), 171-1777.
9. KHAN A., CADAVID R., WANG S.S.Y., 2000. Simulation of channel confluence and bifurcation using the CCHE2D model. Water and Maritime Engineering, 142, 97-102.
10. KINOSHITA S., SATO S., TERAYAMA H., 1996. Flood simulation by two-dimensional tank model. 7th International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, Hanover, Germany, 959-964.
11. LAI J.-S., HUANG L.-H., HSIEH P.-C., LIN M.-Y, 2000. Integration of models for simulating flood inundation in the urban area. Hydroinformatics 2000, Iowa City, Iowa, 8 p.
12. PAQUIER A., 1995. Modélisation et simulation de la propagation de l'onde de rupture de barrage. Thése de doctorat, université Jean Monnet de Saint-Étienne, 215 p.
13. PAQUIER A., 1998. 1-D and 2-D models for simulating dam-break waves and natural floods. Concerted action on dam-break modelling, proceedings of the CADAM meeting, Wallingford, United Kingdom. In: MORRIS M., GALLAND J.-C., BALABANIS P. (éd.), European Commission, Science Research Development, Hydrological and hydrogeological risks, L2985, Luxembourg, 127-140.
14. RICCARDI G.A., 1997, The mathematical modelling of flood propagation for the delineation of flood risk zones. Sustainability of Water Resources under Increasing Uncertainty (Rabat Symposium S1), Rabat, Maroc, 355-363.
15. ROE P.L., 1981. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 43, 357-372.
16. SMITH M., 1992. Street flow analysis using a GIS-based distributed parameter hydrologic model, Hydrocomp92, Budapest, Hungary, 391-399.
17. TANGUY J.M., AL MIKDAD O., ZHANG B., 2001. Risque hydrologique pluvial urbain - un outil de simulation des écoulements superficiels, Bulletin des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées, 232, 85-97.
18. VAN LEER B., 1979, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V.A second-order sequel to GODUNOV's method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32, 101-136.