Infants' reactions to object collision on hit and miss trajectories

Infancy

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 105-118

  Schmuckler, Mark A ^a   Collimore, Lisa M ^a   Dannemiller, James L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFANT; LINEAR SYSTEM; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RELIABILITY; RESPONSE TIME; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 34547656231     PISSN: 15250008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00236.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arterberry, M. E. (1992). Infants' perception of three-dimensional shape specified by motion-carried information. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 337-339.
2. Arterberry, M. E., Craton, L. G., & Yonas, A. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to motion-carried information for depth and object properties. In C. E. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy (pp. 215-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Arterberry, M. E., & Yonas, A. (1988). Infants' sensitivity to kinetic information for three-dimensional object shape. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 1-6.
4. Arterberry, M. E., & Yonas, A. (2000). Perception of three-dimensional shape specified by optic flow by 8-week-old infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 550-556.
5. Ball, W. A., & Tronick, E. (1971). Infant responses to impending collision: Optical and real. Science, 171, 818-820.
6. Beverley, K. I., & Regan, D. (1979). Separable after effects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms? Vision Research, 19, 727-732.
7. Bower, T. G. R., Broughton, J. M., & Moore, M. K. (1970). Infant responses to approaching objects: An indicator of response to distal variables. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 193-196.
8. Carroll, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1981, April). Differentiation of an aperture from an obstacle under conditions of motion by three-month-old infants. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
9. Cutting, J. E., & Readinger, W. O. (2002). Perceived motion while moving: How pairwise nominal invariants make optical flow cohere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 717-747.
10. Cutting, J. E., Readinger, W. O., & Wang, R. F. (2002). Walking, looking to the side, and taking curved paths. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 415-425.
11. Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M., & Braren, P. A. (1995). How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving obstacles. Psychological Review, 102, 627-651.
12. Cutting, J. E., & Wang, R. F. (2000). Heading judgments in minimal environments: The value of a heuristic when invariants are rare. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1146-1159.
13. Cutting, J. E., Wang, R. F., Flückiger, M., & Baumberger, B. (1999). Human heading judgments and object-based information. Vision Research, 39, 1079-1105.
14. DeLucia, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 738-748.
15. DeLucia, P. R. (2004). Time-to-contact judgments of an approach object that is partially concealed by an occluder. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 287-304.
16. DeLucia, P. R., & Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 783-798.
17. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
19. Granrud, C. E., Yonas, A., Smith, I. M., Arterberry, M. E., Glicksman, M. L., & Sorknes, A. C. (1984). Infants' sensitivity to accretion and deletion of texture as information for depth at an edge. Child Development, 55, 1630-1636.
20. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (2000). Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object. Vision Research, 40, 49-63.
21. Hecht, H., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in psychology: Vol. 135. Time-to-contact. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
22. Johansson, G. (1964). Perception of motion and changing form. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 5, 181-208.
23. Kaufmann, F., Stucki, M., & Kaufmann-Hayoz, R. (1985). Development of infants' sensitivity for slow and rapid motions. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 89-98.
24. Kayed, N. S., & van der Meer, A. (2000). Timing strategies used in defensive blinking to optical collisions in 5- and 7-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 253-270.
25. Kerzel, D., Hecht, H., & Kim, N.-G. (2001). Time-to-passage judgments on circular trajectories are based on relative optical acceleration. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1153-1170.
26. Kingsnorth, S., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2000). Walking skill versus walking experience as a predictor of barrier crossing in toddlers. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 331-350.
27. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 439-459.
28. Náñez, J. E. (1988). Perception of impending collision in 3- to 6-week-old human infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 447-463.
29. Náñez, J. E., & Yonas, A. (1994). Effects of luminance and texture motion on infant defensive reactions to optical collision. Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 165-174.
30. Pettersen, L., Yonas, A., & Fisch, R. O. (1980). The development of blinking in response to impending collision in preterm, full-term, and postterm infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 3, 155-165.
31. Readinger, W. O., Chatziastros, A., Cunningham, D. W., Bülthoff, H. H., & Cutting, J. E. (2002). Gaze-eccentricity effects on road position and steering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 247-258.
32. Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1978). Illusory motion in depth: After effect of the adaptation to changing size. Vision Research, 18, 209-212.
33. Regan, D., & Hamstra, S. J. (1993). Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Research, 33, 448-462.
34. Regan, D., & Vincent, A. (1995). Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field. Vision Research, 35, 1845-1857.
35. Schiff, W. (1965). Perception of impending collision: A study of visually directed avoidant behavior. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79(11, Whole No. 604).
36. Schiff, W., Caviness, J. A., & Gibson, J. J. (1962). Persistent fear responses in rhesus monkeys to the optical stimulus of "looming." Science, 136, 982-983.
37. Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647-658.
38. Schmuckler, M. A. (1993). Perception-action coupling in infancy. In G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Ed.), The development of coordination in infancy (pp. 137-173). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39. Schmuckler, M. A. (1995, April). The influence of spatial extent and transparency on toddler's crossing of barriers. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.
40. Schmuckler, M. A. (1996). The development of visually-guided locomotion: Barrier crossing in toddlers. Ecological Psychology, 8, 209-236.
41. Schmuckler, M. A., & Li, N. (1998). Looming responses to obstacles and apertures: The role of accretion and deletion of background texture. Psychological Science, 9, 49-52.
42. Schmuckler, M. A., & Proffitt, D. R. (1994). Infants' perception of kinetic depth and stereokinetic displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 122-130.
43. Shirai, N., Kanazawa, S., & Yamaguchi, M. K. (2004). Asymmetry for the perception of expansion/contraction in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 315-322.
44. Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 795-810.
45. Yonas, A. (1981). Infants' responses to optical information for collision. In R. N. A slin, J. R. Alberts, & M. R. Petersen (Eds.), Development of perception (Vol. 2, pp. 313-334). New York: Academic.
46. Yonas, A., Arterberry, M. E., & Granrud, C. E. (1987). Four-month-old infants' sensitivity to binocular and kinetic information for three-dimensional object shape. Child Development, 58, 910-917.
47. Yonas, A., Bechtold, A. G., Frankel, D., Gordon, F. R., McRoberts, G., Norcia, A., et al. (1977). Development of sensitivity to information for impending collision. Psychology & Psychophysics, 21, 97-104.
48. Yonas, A., & Granrud, C. E. (1985). The development of sensitivity to kinetic, bioncular, and pictorial depth information in human infants. In D. J. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D. N. Lee (Eds.), Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (pp. 113-145). Dordrecht, Germany: Martinus Nijhoff.
49. Yonas, A., Pettersen, L., & Lockman, J. J. (1979). Young infants' sensitivity to optical information for collision. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 268-276.