Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 49-63

  Gray, R ^a   Regan, D ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Catching; Looming; Motion in depth; Optical flow field; Tau; Time to collision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETINA IMAGE; ROTATION; SIMULATION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; ROTATION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0033991341     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00157-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aseltine J.A. Transform methods in linear systems analysis. 1958;McGraw-Hill, New York.
2. Beverley K.I., Regan D. Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: different neural mechanisms? Vision Research. 19:1979a;727-732.
3. Beverley K.I., Regan D. Visual perception of changing-size: the effect of object size. Vision Research. 19:1979b;1093-1104.
4. Beverley K.I., Regan D. Visual sensitivity to the shape and size of a moving object: implications for models of object perception. Perception. 9:1980;151-160.
5. Beverley K.I., Regan D. Texture changes versus size changes as stimuli for motion in depth. Vision Research. 23:1983;1387-1400.
6. Blaquière A. Nonlinear systems analysis. 1966;Academic, New York.
7. Bootsma R.J., van Wieringen P.C.W. Timing an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;21-29.
8. Bracewell H. The Fourier transform and its applications. 1965;McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Cavallo V., Laurent M. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception. 17:1988;623-632.
10. DeLucia P.R. Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;738-748.
11. Fiandt, von K., Gibson J.J. The sensitivity of the eye to two kinds of continuous transformation of a shadow pattern. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 57:1959;344-347.
12. Gray R., Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research. 38:1998;499-512.
13. Gray R., Regan D. Adapting to expansion increases perceived time to collision. Vision Research. 39:1999;3602-3607.
14. Gray R., Regan D. Motion in depth: adequate and inadequate simulation. Perception and Psychophysics. 61:1999;236-245.
15. Heuer H. Estimates of time to contact based on changing size and changing target vergence. Perception. 22:1993;549-563.
16. Hirsch M., Smale S. Differential equations, dynamical systems and linear algebra. 1974;Academic, New York.
17. Hoyle F. The black cloud. 1957;26-27 Penguin Books, London.
18. Johansson G. Perception of motion and changing size. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 5:1964;181-208.
19. Karnavas, W. J., Bahill, A. T., & Regan, D. (1990). Sensitivity analysis of a model for the rising fastball and breaking curveball. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, LA.
20. Kohly R., Regan D. Evidence for a mechanism sensitive to the speed of cyclopean form. Vision Research. 39:1999;1011-1024.
21. Kruk R., Regan D. Visual test results compared with flying performance in telemetry-tracked aircraft. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 54:1983;906-911.
22. Lee D.N. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception. 5:1976;437-459.
23. Lee D.N., Lishman J.R. Visual control of locomotion. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 18:1977;224-230.
24. Lee D.N., Lishman J.R., Thomson J.A. Visual regulation of gait in long jumping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 8:1982;448-459.
25. Lee D.N., Young D.S., Reddish D.E., Lough S., Clayton T.M.H. Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 35A:1983;333-346.
26. Marmarelis P.Z., Marmarelis V.Z. Analysis of physiological systems: the white noise approach. 1978;Plenum, New York.
27. Mountcastle V.B An organizing principle for cerebral functions: the unit module and the distributed system. Schmitt F.O., Worden F.G. The neurosciences: fourth study program. 1979;21-42 MIT, Cambridge, MA.
28. Poincaré H. The value of science. 1913;Science, New York.
29. Reichardt W. Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. Rosenblith W. Sensory communication. 1961;160-175 Wiley, New York.
30. Reichardt W. Processing of optical information by the visual system of the fly. Vision Research. 26:1986;113-126.
31. Reichardt, W., & Poggio, T. (1981). Theoretical approaches in neurobiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
32. Regan D. Visual judgements and misjudgements in cricket, and the art of flight. Perception. 21:1992;91-115.
33. Regan D. Spatial orientation in aviation: visual contributions. Journal of Vestibular Research. 5:1995;455-471.
34. Regan D. Visual factors in hitting and catching. Journal of Sports Sciences. 15:1997;533-558.
35. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Looming detectors in the human visual pathway. Vision Research. 18:1978a;415-421.
36. Regan D., Beverley K.J. Illusory motion in depth: aftereffect of adaptation to changing size. Vision Research. 18:1978b;209-212.
37. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. Science. 205:1979a;311-313.
38. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage. Vision Research. 19:1979b;1331-1342.
39. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 11:1980;1289-1296.
40. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Motion sensitivity measured by a psychophysical linearizing technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 71:1981;958-965.
41. Regan D., Hamstra S Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion. Vision Research. 33:1993;447-462.
42. Regan, D., Kaufman, L., & Lincoln, J. (1986). Motion in depth and visual acceleration. In: K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, J. P. Thomas, Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 19-1 to 19-46). New York: Wiley.
43. Regan D., Erkelens C.J., Collewijn H. Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 27:1986;584-597.
44. Regan D., Vincent A. Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field. Vision Research. 35:1995;1845-1857.
45. Savelsbergh G.J.P., Whiting H.T.A., Bootsma R.J. Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;315-322.
46. Schiff W., Detwiler M.L. Information judged in impending collision. Perception. 8:1979;647-658.
47. Todd J.T. Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 7:1981;795-810.
48. Tresilian J.R. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;865-876.
49. Tresilian J.R. Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interception timings. Perception. 22:1993;653-680.
50. Van Santen J.P.H., Sperling G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;300-321.
51. Vincent A., Regan D. Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: effect of mismatching rates of expansion of size and of texture elements. Perception and Psychophysics. 59:1997;32-36.
52. Wang Y., Frost B.J. Time to collision is signaled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons. Nature. 356:1992;236-238.
53. Warren W.H., Young D.S., Lee D.N. Visual control of step length during running over irregular terrain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 12:1986;259-266.
54. Westheimer G. Physiological optics during the first quarter-century of Vision Research. Vision Research. 26:1986;1513.
55. Wheatstone C. Contribution to the physiology of vision. II. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London). 142:1852;1-18.
56. White, H. J., & Tauber, S. (1969a). Systems analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.
57. White, H. J., & Tauber, S. (1969b). Systems analysis. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.