Variability in soft classification prediction and its implications for sub-pixel scale change detection and super resolution mapping

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 73, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 923-933

  Foody, Giles M ^a   Doan, H T X ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER;

LINEAR MIXTURE MODEL; SOFT CLASSIFICATION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

FOREST COVER; MAPPING; PIXEL; RESOLUTION; SATELLITE DATA; SENSOR;

BRAZIL; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 34547609867     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.73.8.923     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bateson, C.A., G.P. Asner, and C.A. Wessman, 2000. Endmember bundles: A new approach to incorporating endmember variability into spectral mixture analysis, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38:1083-1094.
2. Boucher, A., and P.C. Kyriakidis, 2006. Super-resolution land-cover mapping with indicator geostatistics, Remote Sensing of Environment, 104:264-282.
3. Carpenter, G.A., S. Gopal, S. Macomber, S. Martens, and C.E. Woodcock, 1999. A neural network method for mixture estimation for vegetation mapping, Remote Sensing of Environment, 70:138-152.
4. Fisher, P.F., 1997. The pixel: A snare and a delusion, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18:679-685.
5. Foody, G.M., 1996. Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land-cover classifications from remotely sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17:1317-1340.
6. Foody, G.M., 2001. Monitoring the magnitude of land-cover change around the southern limits of the Sahara, Photogrammetric Engineering S& Remote Sensing, 67(8):841-847.
7. Haertel, V., Y.E. Shimabukuro, and R. Almeida-Filho, 2004. Fraction images in multitemporal change detection, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25:5473-5489.
8. Jug, J., E.D. Kolaczyk, and S. Gopal, 2003. Gaussian mixture dicriminant analysis and sub-pixel land-cover characterisation in remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 84: 550-560.
9. Liu, W., and E.Y. Wu, 2005. Comparison of non-linear mixture models; Sub-pixel classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 94:145-154.
10. Mertens, K.C., B. De Baets, L.P.C. Verbeke, and R.R. De Wulf, 2006. A sub-pixel mapping algorithm based on sub-pixel/pixel spatial attraction models, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27:3293-3310.
11. Muslim, A.M., G.M. Foody, and P.M. Atkinson, 2006. Localised soft classification for super-resolution mapping of the shoreline, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27: 2271-2285.
12. Peterson, S.H., and D.A. Stow, 2003. Using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis to study chaparral regrowth in southern California, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24:4481-4504.
13. Petrou, M., and P.G. Foschi, 1999. Confidence in linear spectral unmixing of single pixels, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37:624-626.
14. Rogers, A.S., and M.S. Kearney, 2004. Reducing signature variability in unmixing coastal marsh Thematic Mapper scenes using spectral indices, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25:2317-2335.
15. Settle, J.J., and N.A. Drake, 1993. Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14:1159-1177.
16. Skole, D., and C. Tucker, 1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988, Science, 260:1905-1910.
17. Small, C., 2004. The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93:1-17.
18. Song, C., 2005. Spectral mixture analysis for subpixel vegetation fractions in the urban environment: How to incorporate endmember variability?, Remote Sensing of Environment, 95:248-263.
19. Tatem, A.J., H.G. Lewis, P.M. Atkinson, and M.S. Nixon, 2001. Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39:781-796.
20. Theseira, M.A., G. Thomas, J.C. Taylor, F. Gemmell, and J. Varjo, 2003. Sensitivity of mixture modelling to end-member selection, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24:1559-1575.