A neural network method for mixture estimation for vegetation mapping

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 138-152

  Carpenter, Gail A ^a   Gopal, Sucharita ^a   MacOmber, Scott ^a   Martens, Siegfried ^a   Woodcock, Curtis E ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HABITAT; THEMATIC MAPPING;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; SATELLITES; VEGETATION;

REMOTE SENSING;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ESTIMATION METHOD; REMOTE SENSING; VEGETATION MAPPING;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 0033231469     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00027-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams J.B., Sabol D.E., Kapos V.et al. Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers. application of land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon Remote Sens. Environ. 52:1995;137-154.
2. Adams J.B., Smith M.O., Gillespie A.H. Imaging spectroscopy. interpretation based on spectral mixture analysis Pieters C.M., Englert P. Remote Geochemical Analysis. Elemental and Mineralogical Composition 7:1993;145-166 Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. Adams J.B., Smith M.O., Johnson P.E. Spectral mixture modeling. a new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander I site J. Geophys. Res. 91(B8):1986;8098-8112.
4. Carpenter G.A. Distributed learning, recognition, and prediction by ART and ARTMAP neural networks. Neural Networks. 10:1997;1473-1494.
5. Carpenter G.A., Gjaja M.N., Gopal S., Woodcock C.E. ART neural networks for remote sensing. vegetation classification from Landsat TM and terrain data IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 35:1997;308-325.
6. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S., Markuzon N., Reynolds J.H., Rosen D.B. Fuzzy ARTMAP. a neural network architecture for incremental supervised learning of analog multidimensional maps IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 3:1992;698-713.
7. Carpenter G.A., Grossberg S., Reynolds J.H. Artmap. supervised real-time learning and classification of nonstationary data by a self-organizing neural network Neural Networks. 4:1991;565-588.
8. Civco D.L. Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper digital imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 55:1989;1303-1309.
9. Fisher P., Pathirana S. An evaluation of fuzzy membership of landcover classes in the suburban zone. Remote Sens. Environ. 34:1990;121-132.
10. Foody G.M. Relating the land-cover composition of mixed pixels to artificial neural network classification output. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 62:1996;491-499.
11. Foody G.M., Campbell N.A., Trodd N.M., Wood T.F. Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from maximum likelihood classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 58(9):1992;1335-1341.
12. Foody G.M., Lucas R.M., Curran P.J., Honzak M. Non-linear mixture modeling without end-members using an artificial neural network. Int. J. Remote Sens. 18:1997;937-954.
13. Frew, J. E. (1990), The image processing workbench, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 303 pp.
14. Gu D., Gillespie A. Topographic normalization of Landsat TM images of forest based on subpixel Sun-canopy- sensor geometry. Remote Sens. Environ. 64:1998;166-175.
15. Holben B.N., Justice C.O. The topographic effect on spectral response from nadir-pointing sensors. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 46:1980;1191-1200.
16. Justice C.O., Wharton S.W., Holben B.N. Application of digital terrain data to quantify and reduce the topographic effect on Landsat data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2:1981;213-230.
17. Lee T.Y., Kaufman Y.J. Non-lambertian effects on remote sensing of surface reflectance and vegetation index. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 24:1986;699-708.
18. Li X., Strahler A.H. Geometric-optical bidirectional reflectance modeling of discrete crown vegetation canopy. effect of crown shape and mutual shadowing IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GE-30:1992;276-292.
19. Marsh S.E., Switzer P., Kowalik W.S., Lyon R.J.P. Resolving the percentage of component terrains within single resolution elements. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 46:1980;1079-1086.
20. Moody A., Gopal S., Strahler A.H. Sensitivity of neural networks to subpixel land-cover mixtures in coarse-resolution satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 58:1996;329-343.
21. Mosier, C. I. (1951), Symposium: the need and the means for cross-validation. 1. Problem and designs of cross-validation. Ed. Psychol. Measure. 11:5-11.
22. Nalepka, R. F., and Hyde, P. D. (1972), Classifying unresolved objects from simulated space data. In Proc. of the 8th Int. Symp. on Remote Sens. Environ., Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 935-949.
23. Naugle B.I., Lashlee J.D. Alleviating topographic influences on land-cover classifications for mobility and combat modeling. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 58:1992;1217-1221.
24. Proy C., Tanré D., Deschamps P.Y. Evaluation of topographic effects in remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 30:1989;21-32.
25. Ray T.W., Murray B.C. Nonlinear spectral mixing in desert vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 55:1996;59-64.
26. Richards J.A. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction. 2nd ed:1993;340 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
27. Roberts D.A., Smith M.O., Adams J.B. Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 44:1993;255-269.
28. Robinson V.B. Some implications of fuzzy set theory applied to geographic databases. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 12:1988;89-98.
29. Smith J.A., Lin T.L., Ranson K.J. The lambertian assumption and Landsat data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 46:1980;1183-1189.
30. Smith M.O., Ustin S.L., Adams J.R., Gillespie A.R. Vegetation in deserts. I. A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images Remote Sens. Environ. 31:1990;1-26.
31. Stenback J.M., Congalton R.G. Using thematic mapper imagery to examine forest understory. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 56:1990;1285-1290.
32. Strahler A.H. Stratification of natural vegetation for forest and rangeland inventory using Landsat digital imagery and collateral data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2:1981;15-41.
33. Strahler A.N. Vegetation canopy reflectance modeling - recent developments and remote sensing perspectives. Remote Sens. Rev. 15:1997;179-194.
34. Strahler A.H., Woodcock C.E., Smith J.A. On the nature of models in remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 20:1986;121-139.
35. Verstraete M.M., Pinty B., Dickinson R.E. A physical model of the bidirectional reflectance of vegetation canopies. 1. Theory J. Geophys. Res. 95:1990;11,755-11,765.
36. Woodcock C.E., Collins J., Gopal S.et al. Mapping forest vegetation using Landsat TM imagery and a canopy reflectance model. Remote Sens. Environ. 50:1994;240-254.
37. Woodcock C.E., Gopal S., Albert W. Evaluation of the potential for providing secondary labels in vegetation maps. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 62:1996;393-399.