An integrated approach to breast diseases and breast cancer registry and research: BDRS as a web-based multi-institutional model

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1414-1425

  Koçgil, Oya Deniz ^a   Baykal, Nazife ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Breast diseases; Cancer registry; Object oriented technologies; Research database; Web based architecture; XML

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TUMORS; WORLD WIDE WEB; XML;

BREAST DISEASES; CANCER REGISTRY; OBJECT-ORIENTED TECHNOLOGIES; RESEARCH DATABASE; WEB-BASED ARCHITECTURE;

DISEASES;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; CANCER REGISTRY; DISEASE REGISTRY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; REGISTRIES; TURKEY;

EID: 34547570257     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Carter K.J., Castro F., Kassler E., and Ericson B. A computer model for the study of breast cancer. Comput. Biol. Med. 33 (2003) 345-360
2. Liu G.C., Cooper J.G., Schoeffler K.M., and Hammond H. Standards for the electronic health record emerging from health care's tower of babel. Proceedings of AMIA 2001 (2001) 388-392
3. Allan D.E., Stajduhar K.I., and Reid R.C. The uses of provincial administrative health databases for research on palliative care: insights from British Columbia. Canada, BMC Palliat Care 4 (2005) 2
4. Haux R. Health care in the information society, A prognosis for the year 2013. Int. J. Med. Inform. 66 (2002) 2-19
5. Issued by: World Health Organization-International Agency for Research on Cancer, Biennial Report 2000-2001, Lyon, France, 2001.
6. Guinee V.F. Epidemiology of breast cancer. In: Bland K.I., and Copeland E.M. (Eds). The Breast (1998), WB Saunders 339
7. F. Bray, J. Ferlay, D.M. Parkin, P. Pisani, 2004. GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. IARC cancerbase No. 5 version 2.0 Lyon: IARC Press.
8. Scott D., Curtis B., and Twumasi F.O. Towards the creation of a health information system for cancer in KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa, Health Place 8 (2002) 237-249
9. In: Menck H., and Smart C. (Eds). Central Cancer, Registries, Design, Management, and Use (1994), Hargood Academic Publishers, Switzerland
10. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, URL 〈http://seer.cancer.gov〉, accessed 2005 April 23.
11. IARC, The International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization URL, France, URL 〈http://www.iarc.fr/〉, accessed 2005 April 23.
12. Parkin D.M. The evolution of the population-based cancer registry. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6 (2006) 601-612
13. Cancer Research in California, California Cancer Registry (CCR), URL 〈http://www.ccrcal.org/brochure/research.pdf〉, accessed 2005 April 23.
14. Cancer Program Report, 2000, UTAH, University of Utah Hospital Cancer Registry, URL 〈http://www.huntsmancancer.org/1035.html〉, accessed 2005 April 23.
15. Sander G.A.C., Coeberg J.W.W., Schouten L.J., Visser O., and Leeuwen F.E. Cancer incidence in the Netherlands in 1989 and 1990: first results of the nationwide Netherlands cancer registry. Eur. J. Cancer 31A 11 (1995) 1822-1830
16. Altmann U., Tafazzoli A.G., Katz F.R., and Dudeck J. XML-based application interface services-a method to enhance integrability of disease specific systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 68 (2002) 27-37
17. Fidaner C., Eser S.Y., and Parkin D.M. Incidence in Izmir in 1993-1994: first results from Izmir Cancer Registry. Eur. J. Cancer 37 (2001) 83-92
18. Izmir Cancer Registry 〈http://www.ism.gov.tr/kidem〉, accessed 2006 November 5.
19. Middle East Cancer Consortium 〈http://mecc.cancer.gov/turkey.html〉, accessed 2006 November 5.
20. Silva J.S., Ball M.J., and Douglas J.V. The cancer informatics infrastructure (CII). an architecture for translating clinical research into patient care. In: Patel V., et al. (Ed). MEDINFO 2001, Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Health and Medical Informatics. Geneva, Switzerland (2001), North-Holland, Amsterdam 114-118
21. Warsi A.A., White S., and McCulloch P. Completeness of data entry in three cancer surgery databases. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 28 (2002) 850-856
22. Fisk J.M., Mutalik P., Levin F.W., Erdos J., Taylor C., and Nadkarni P. Integrating query of relational and textual data in clinical databases: a case study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 1 (2003) 21-38
23. Stotter A., Bright N., Silcocks P.B., and Botha J.L. Effect of improved data collection on breast cancer incidence and survival: reconciliation of a registry with a clinical database. Br. Med. J. 321 7555 (2000) 214-215
24. Castro F., Carter K.J., Kessler E., Erickson B.A., and Kseibi S.A. The relation of breast cancer staging to screening protocol compliance: a computer simulation study. Comput. Biol. Med. 35 2 (2005) 91-101
25. van Ginneken A.S. The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit. Int. J. Med. Inf. 65 (2002) 97-119
26. Gail M.H., Costantino J.P., Bryant J., Croyle R., Freedman L., Helzlsouer K., and Vogel V. Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91 21 (1999) 1829-1875
27. Issued by performing agency: NHS National Cancer Dataset v 2.0 〈http://www.nhsia.nhs.uk/cancer/pages/dataset/docs/dataset.pdf〉, accessed 2005 April 23.
28. Tenenbaum J.M. Cancer informatics: lessons from the world of e-Business. In: Silva J.S. (Ed). Cancer Informatics Essential Technologies for Clinical Trials (2002), Springer, Berlin 51-69
29. Yamazaki S., and Satomura Y. Standard method for describing an electronic patient record temple: application of XML to share domain knowledge. Methods Inform. Med. 39 (2000) 50-55
30. Canfield K. Improving interorganizational data interchange for drug development. Comput. Biol. Med. 29 (1999) 89-99
31. Güler I., and Müldür S. A model approach to sharing electronic medical records between and within the state hospitals in Turkey. Comput. Biol. Med. 31 (2001) 513-523
32. Liu C.T., Long A.G., Li Y., Tsai T., and Kuo H. Sharing patient care records over the World Wide Web. Int. J. Med. Inform. 61 (2001) 189-205
33. Chu S., and Cesnik B. A three-tier clinical information system design model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 57 (2000) 91-107
34. Velde R.V. Framework for a clinical information system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 57 (2000) 57-72
35. Safran C., and Goldberg H. Electronic patient records and the impact of the Internet. Int. J. Med. Inform. 60 (2000) 77-83
36. Naressi A., Couturier C., Castang I., Beer R., and Graveron-Demilly D. Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput. Biol. Med. 31 (2001) 269-286
37. Staccini P., Joubert M., Quarant J., Aymard S., Fieschi D., and Fiesci M. Towards health care process description framework: an XML DTD design. Proceedings of AMIA (2001) 647-651
38. Stalidis G., Prentza A., Vlachos I.N., Maglavera S., and Koutsouris D. Medical support systems for continuation of care based XML web technology. Int. J. Med. Inform. 64 (2001) 385-400
39. Abidi S.S.R., and Manickam S. Leveraging XML-based electronic medical records to extract experiential clinical knowledge. An automated approach to generate cases for medical case-based reasoning systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 68 (2002) 187-203
40. Marenco L., Tosches N., Crasto C., Shepherd G., Miller P.L., and Nadkarni P.M. Achieving evolvable web-database bioscience applications using the EAV/CR framework: recent advances. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 5 (2003) 444-453
41. Takeda H., Matsumura Y., Kuwata S., Nakano H., Sakamoto N., and Yamamoto R. Architecture for networked electronic patient record system. Int. J. Med. Inform. 60 (2000) 161-167
42. Jacobson I. Object-Oriented Software Engineering. A Use Case Driven Approach (1992), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
43. Booch G., Rumbaugh J., and Jacobson I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide (1999), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
44. Kushniruk A. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Comput. Biol. Med. 32 (2002) 141-149
45. Stefanelli M. The role of methodologies to improve efficiency and effectiveness of care delivery process for the year 2013. Int. J. Med. Inform. 66 (2002) 34-44
46. O.M. Jensen et al. (Eds.), Cancer registration IARC, Lyon, Principles and Methods, vol. 95, 1991.
47. In: Hutchison L.L., Roffers S.D., and Fritz A.G. (Eds). Cancer Registry Management, Principles and Practice (1997), Kendal Hunt, Iowa
48. Kazanjian A., and Green C.J. Beyond effectiveness: the evaluation of information systems using a comprehensive health technology assessment framework. Comput. Biol. Med. 32 (2002) 165-177